DeskCNC Capabilities
Posted by
Fred Smith <imserv@v...
on 2003-01-23 15:35:23 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "ballendo <ballendo@y...>"
<ballendo@y...> wrote:
The scaling of the steps and microsteps is calculated in terms of
steps per mm, out to about 5 or 6 decimals.
same scaling in X and Y axis. This means the same pitch, gearing,
and steps/rev ratios on X and Y. Will probably change soon. The
most common type of machine using different X & Y ratios seem to be
CNC routers/plasma with a long X compared to a much shorter Y axis.
These tend to need higher topend speeds as well as well. 150-200 ipm
vs 15-25 ipm for milling steel and aluminum.
Fanout on all axes is 25 ma/ea. Can only drive one Gecko per axis.
Slaved A axis to X is also in the works for machines with two X axis
motors.
Best Regards,
Fred Smith - IMService
<ballendo@y...> wrote:
> Hello all,This has never been the case for DeskCNC.
>
> Two things to know about DeskCNC:
>
> Steps must be integer units, 1996.76 SPI is not allowed. You either
> use 1996, or 1997 in this example...
>
The scaling of the steps and microsteps is calculated in terms of
steps per mm, out to about 5 or 6 decimals.
>This is still an advertised requirement. Arcs presently require the
> And possibly more important: Both X and Y must have the same number
> of steps per unit for arcs to work.
>
same scaling in X and Y axis. This means the same pitch, gearing,
and steps/rev ratios on X and Y. Will probably change soon. The
most common type of machine using different X & Y ratios seem to be
CNC routers/plasma with a long X compared to a much shorter Y axis.
These tend to need higher topend speeds as well as well. 150-200 ipm
vs 15-25 ipm for milling steel and aluminum.
Fanout on all axes is 25 ma/ea. Can only drive one Gecko per axis.
Slaved A axis to X is also in the works for machines with two X axis
motors.
Best Regards,
Fred Smith - IMService
Discussion Thread
sparkness2001 <mark@c...
2003-01-21 07:29:46 UTC
windows or dos based NC software
James Owens
2003-01-21 12:41:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Art
2003-01-21 14:23:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
CL
2003-01-21 15:23:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Art
2003-01-21 15:53:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
James Owens
2003-01-21 16:01:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
James Cullins
2003-01-21 17:01:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
zestronad54529 <dpeter@n...
2003-01-21 17:49:56 UTC
Re: windows or dos based NC software
Jack Coats
2003-01-21 17:59:44 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Jack Coats
2003-01-21 17:59:48 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Les Watts
2003-01-21 18:00:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: windows or dos based NC software
James Owens
2003-01-21 18:04:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2003-01-21 18:22:41 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2003-01-21 18:22:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2003-01-21 18:31:31 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
CL
2003-01-21 21:59:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Hans Wedemeyer
2003-01-22 06:42:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Ray Henry
2003-01-22 06:49:36 UTC
Re: RE: windows or dos based NC software
sparkness2001 <mark@c...
2003-01-22 07:14:08 UTC
Re: windows or dos based NC software
alex
2003-01-22 08:13:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
CL
2003-01-22 10:11:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: windows or dos based NC software
Fred Smith <imserv@v...
2003-01-22 17:04:14 UTC
Re: windows or dos based NC software
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-01-23 05:41:14 UTC
DeskCNC limitations was Re: windows or dos based NC software
Fred Smith <imserv@v...
2003-01-23 15:35:23 UTC
DeskCNC Capabilities
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-01-24 06:25:21 UTC
Re: DeskCNC Capabilities