Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Posted by
CL
on 2003-01-21 15:23:12 UTC
James Owens wrote:
That may have been true 4-6 years ago, more actually, I've been
running retro machines with Flashcuts "It's impossible in windows"
methods since what '96 ?.. '98, '95 ?? Not only as a hobby either. Some
very dependable machines running 10 hour days. I really have a hard time
believing that this is still the concept of windows controls.
By the way, I PULLED DOS controls from those machines. I must be nuts ?
2, no 4... then there were those other.... I think I may have been
involved in at least 12 new Retros replacing DOS controllers. They are
not looking back...... I would NEVER go back. There is no reason to.
I think many are unaware just how many BIG companies actually use
Windows controls even at this, what we might call "hobby level". I know
of some really big names that would not do it if it did not work.
I betcha if someone asked Mr. Fenerty what he thought,.... Ask him if
OEM's are indicating they DO NOT want his control because it is windows
and it is too "crazy"...., he'd set them straight.
Not hassling anyone, or pointing fingers, just that the concept it can't
be done in windows because it will just not work is incorrect. I've
listened to such incorrect comments for all these years..... can't take
it anymore, I'm going to crack ! #%$##@((
Mark, write to me directly for the "Truth" about Windows Control in THIS
century.
Sorry for the outburst,
:-) Chris L
>Hi Mark,I sure would like to know where people have been in this regard........
>
>There is no question as to what the answer should be, dos. When your
>machines table disappears through the wall because Windows is off doing
>whatever Gates decided it should do when really needed you will not be
>thinking of the nice GUI.
>
That may have been true 4-6 years ago, more actually, I've been
running retro machines with Flashcuts "It's impossible in windows"
methods since what '96 ?.. '98, '95 ?? Not only as a hobby either. Some
very dependable machines running 10 hour days. I really have a hard time
believing that this is still the concept of windows controls.
By the way, I PULLED DOS controls from those machines. I must be nuts ?
2, no 4... then there were those other.... I think I may have been
involved in at least 12 new Retros replacing DOS controllers. They are
not looking back...... I would NEVER go back. There is no reason to.
I think many are unaware just how many BIG companies actually use
Windows controls even at this, what we might call "hobby level". I know
of some really big names that would not do it if it did not work.
I betcha if someone asked Mr. Fenerty what he thought,.... Ask him if
OEM's are indicating they DO NOT want his control because it is windows
and it is too "crazy"...., he'd set them straight.
Not hassling anyone, or pointing fingers, just that the concept it can't
be done in windows because it will just not work is incorrect. I've
listened to such incorrect comments for all these years..... can't take
it anymore, I'm going to crack ! #%$##@((
Mark, write to me directly for the "Truth" about Windows Control in THIS
century.
Sorry for the outburst,
:-) Chris L
Discussion Thread
sparkness2001 <mark@c...
2003-01-21 07:29:46 UTC
windows or dos based NC software
James Owens
2003-01-21 12:41:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Art
2003-01-21 14:23:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
CL
2003-01-21 15:23:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Art
2003-01-21 15:53:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
James Owens
2003-01-21 16:01:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
James Cullins
2003-01-21 17:01:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
zestronad54529 <dpeter@n...
2003-01-21 17:49:56 UTC
Re: windows or dos based NC software
Jack Coats
2003-01-21 17:59:44 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Jack Coats
2003-01-21 17:59:48 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Les Watts
2003-01-21 18:00:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: windows or dos based NC software
James Owens
2003-01-21 18:04:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2003-01-21 18:22:41 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2003-01-21 18:22:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2003-01-21 18:31:31 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
CL
2003-01-21 21:59:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Hans Wedemeyer
2003-01-22 06:42:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Ray Henry
2003-01-22 06:49:36 UTC
Re: RE: windows or dos based NC software
sparkness2001 <mark@c...
2003-01-22 07:14:08 UTC
Re: windows or dos based NC software
alex
2003-01-22 08:13:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
CL
2003-01-22 10:11:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: windows or dos based NC software
Fred Smith <imserv@v...
2003-01-22 17:04:14 UTC
Re: windows or dos based NC software
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-01-23 05:41:14 UTC
DeskCNC limitations was Re: windows or dos based NC software
Fred Smith <imserv@v...
2003-01-23 15:35:23 UTC
DeskCNC Capabilities
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-01-24 06:25:21 UTC
Re: DeskCNC Capabilities