RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DenverCNC?
Posted by
Tim Goldstein
on 2003-10-27 15:59:43 UTC
> Derek,Peter,
>
> My suggested motor rating comes from being involved with the
> taigtools list for a number of years. A lot of people have
> done there own Taig conversions and those that have used the
> larger motors (~200oz/in) seem to be the happiest. Also the
> fact that Taig supply these motors on their CNC mill gives you a clue.
>
>
> Peter Homann
I was also a big proponent of 200 oz/in motors on table top machines.
What I have found is that my experience was based on the then current
state of hobby drives with half step controllers. Now that I have gone
to microstep drives I am amazed at how well the smaller motors are able
to drive the mill. With the new experience I have revised my advise. You
can now get a very solid and reliable CNC setup on a Taig or a Sherline
with a good quality motor just over 100 oz/in if you use a microstep
drive and at least a 10X over voltage on the drive (meaning you are
using a current limiting drive). Now if you have high inductance motors
or are using a 1/4 or half step controller I still agree with the 200
oz/in suggestion. As I have learned I have found that there is far more
to making a solid and reliable system than just specifying a motor
holding torque. Motor inductance, over voltage, microstepping, pulse
stream pacing, and more all enter into the picture. There are also cases
where I have gotten better performance from a smaller motor than a
torquier motor because of the higher inductance of the beefier motor.
Bottom line is that one parameter does not define whether a system will
be reliable or not.
Tim
[Denver, CO]
Sherline & Taig products at Deep Discount
Mach1 & DeskCNC with credit card ordering
www.KTMarketing.com/Sherline
e-mail me at Timg @ KTMarketing.com for items not yet listed
Discussion Thread
Mike McCaughey
2003-10-24 09:32:45 UTC
DenverCNC?
Tim Goldstein
2003-10-24 10:20:09 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DenverCNC?
William Schmiedlin
2003-10-24 15:36:01 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DenverCNC?
Kim Lux
2003-10-24 15:36:58 UTC
Threadmilling success...
Tim Goldstein
2003-10-24 16:19:54 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DenverCNC?
Jason Cox
2003-10-24 16:20:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Threadmilling success...
Jason Cox
2003-10-24 16:23:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Threadmilling success...
Derek B.
2003-10-26 23:14:04 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DenverCNC?
Peter Homann
2003-10-27 00:16:08 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DenverCNC?
Tony Jeffree
2003-10-27 00:35:27 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DenverCNC?
Derek B.
2003-10-27 09:11:22 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DenverCNC?
Peter Homann
2003-10-27 15:12:03 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DenverCNC?
Tim Goldstein
2003-10-27 15:59:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DenverCNC?
Peter Homann
2003-10-27 16:44:31 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DenverCNC?
Tim Goldstein
2003-10-27 16:48:05 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DenverCNC?
Statman Designs, LLC
2003-10-27 21:21:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DenverCNC?
ballendo
2003-10-28 00:25:47 UTC
Re: DenverCNC?
Derek B.
2003-10-28 06:49:35 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DenverCNC?
Tim Goldstein
2003-10-28 07:39:05 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DenverCNC?
ballendo
2003-10-29 06:37:26 UTC
OT thank you was Re: DenverCNC?
ballendo
2003-10-29 06:39:25 UTC
OT thank you was Re: DenverCNC?