CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DenverCNC?

Posted by Peter Homann
on 2003-10-27 16:44:31 UTC
Tim,

Most of my experience has come from 1/2 step drives so some of my comments
may not be relevant to a micro stepping drive.

I am sure that the DenverCNC system and the 114oz/in motors have been
thoroughly tested by yourself and others, and has been found to be a good
match with the Taig mill.

Therefore I shall stand (or sit) corrected.

Cheers,


Peter Homann
mailto:Peter.Homann@...
Adacel Technologies Limited,
250 Bay St, BRIGHTON, 3186, AUSTRALIA
http://www.adacel.com <http://www.adacel.com>
Telephone +61 (3) 8530 7777, Facsimile +61 (3) 9596 2960
Mobile 0421-601 665


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Goldstein [mailto:timg@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, 28 October 2003 11:00 AM
> To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DenverCNC?
>
>
> > Derek,
> >
> > My suggested motor rating comes from being involved with the
> > taigtools list for a number of years. A lot of people have
> > done there own Taig conversions and those that have used the
> > larger motors (~200oz/in) seem to be the happiest. Also the
> > fact that Taig supply these motors on their CNC mill gives you a clue.
> >
> >
> > Peter Homann
>
> Peter,
>
> I was also a big proponent of 200 oz/in motors on table top machines.
> What I have found is that my experience was based on the then current
> state of hobby drives with half step controllers. Now that I have gone
> to microstep drives I am amazed at how well the smaller motors are able
> to drive the mill. With the new experience I have revised my advise. You
> can now get a very solid and reliable CNC setup on a Taig or a Sherline
> with a good quality motor just over 100 oz/in if you use a microstep
> drive and at least a 10X over voltage on the drive (meaning you are
> using a current limiting drive). Now if you have high inductance motors
> or are using a 1/4 or half step controller I still agree with the 200
> oz/in suggestion. As I have learned I have found that there is far more
> to making a solid and reliable system than just specifying a motor
> holding torque. Motor inductance, over voltage, microstepping, pulse
> stream pacing, and more all enter into the picture. There are also cases
> where I have gotten better performance from a smaller motor than a
> torquier motor because of the higher inductance of the beefier motor.
>
> Bottom line is that one parameter does not define whether a system will
> be reliable or not.
>
> Tim
> [Denver, CO]
> Sherline & Taig products at Deep Discount
> Mach1 & DeskCNC with credit card ordering
> www.KTMarketing.com/Sherline
> e-mail me at Timg @ KTMarketing.com for items not yet listed
>
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com,
> wanliker@..., timg@...
> Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... [Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to
> reach it if you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this
> to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same
> members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY
> POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO
> EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

Discussion Thread

Mike McCaughey 2003-10-24 09:32:45 UTC DenverCNC? Tim Goldstein 2003-10-24 10:20:09 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DenverCNC? William Schmiedlin 2003-10-24 15:36:01 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DenverCNC? Kim Lux 2003-10-24 15:36:58 UTC Threadmilling success... Tim Goldstein 2003-10-24 16:19:54 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DenverCNC? Jason Cox 2003-10-24 16:20:02 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Threadmilling success... Jason Cox 2003-10-24 16:23:57 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Threadmilling success... Derek B. 2003-10-26 23:14:04 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DenverCNC? Peter Homann 2003-10-27 00:16:08 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DenverCNC? Tony Jeffree 2003-10-27 00:35:27 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DenverCNC? Derek B. 2003-10-27 09:11:22 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DenverCNC? Peter Homann 2003-10-27 15:12:03 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DenverCNC? Tim Goldstein 2003-10-27 15:59:43 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DenverCNC? Peter Homann 2003-10-27 16:44:31 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DenverCNC? Tim Goldstein 2003-10-27 16:48:05 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DenverCNC? Statman Designs, LLC 2003-10-27 21:21:09 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DenverCNC? ballendo 2003-10-28 00:25:47 UTC Re: DenverCNC? Derek B. 2003-10-28 06:49:35 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DenverCNC? Tim Goldstein 2003-10-28 07:39:05 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DenverCNC? ballendo 2003-10-29 06:37:26 UTC OT thank you was Re: DenverCNC? ballendo 2003-10-29 06:39:25 UTC OT thank you was Re: DenverCNC?