CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Power Supply

Posted by rpbfire
on 2003-11-21 06:58:00 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Jon Elson <elson@p...> wrote:
> The reason is that you are using a capacitor-input filter, which
> delivers the
> peak of the sine wave. A 24 V RMS sine wave has a peak 1.414 times
> higher, that is 33.9 V. So, your results are exactly as
expected. If you
> need 24 V DC, you should use a transformer with a 17 V RMS output.
> The relays probably don't take a lot of current, so you could just
add
> a separate transformer for the 24 V DC stuff.
>
> Jon

Jon,
Thanks for the reply. But the reason I am asking this question is
mostly for a better understanding of how this stuff works. I do
have a viable option in place to get the 24vdc I need. But I am
confused. I understand the diff between rms and and peak, and that
you get close to peak out from my setup. But I would have thought
that Bridgeport (Textron) would have set it up to get the correct
24vdc out, i.e., using the proper transformer size. There is
another dc supply piggybacked into this setup for -22vdc. It
powered some of the logic cards from bp that are now eliminated. It
only jumped to about 26vdc with my higher main power. After running
some crude numbers, this seems correct. It gets the same input ac
of 127v (supposed to be 115v) from the same isolation transformer as
the offending 24vdc supply does. The only difference I can between
the two is in the step down transformers they use inside the supply
itself. The problem supply, according to the bp wiring diagram,
uses what looks like a transformer with with two same sized
secondary coils in it. The legs of each coil are labled 0 and 28.
The 0 of both coils goes to the same side of the bridge rectifier,
and the same for the 28 leg of botth goes to the other side of the
rectifier. I am not sure what effect this has on supplied ac to the
rectifier. I have never run accross this type of setup in my
limited experience with electrical applications. Any insight would
be much appreciated. I would love to pointed to a resource where I
could read up on this stuff. Like I said before, I am newbie, so is
this stuff is O.T. or inapropriate to the group, please forgive me.
Thanks.

Discussion Thread

Ozzie@h... 2000-10-01 06:35:33 UTC Power Supply Jon Elson 2000-10-01 22:09:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply Ozzie@h... 2000-11-19 20:01:57 UTC Power Supply Carlos Guillermo 2001-12-30 11:01:48 UTC Power Supply allan_reinhard 2001-12-30 12:55:37 UTC Re: Power Supply ka1bbg 2001-12-30 18:47:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply macfool68 2002-04-19 23:20:04 UTC Re: Power Supply Ray Henry 2002-04-20 05:32:11 UTC Re: Re: Power Supply Bill Vance 2002-04-20 12:30:48 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Power Supply kilroy2k1 2002-07-29 20:11:21 UTC Power Supply mariss92705 2002-07-29 20:44:53 UTC Re: Power Supply MIKEC@W... 2002-07-29 21:29:05 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply JanRwl@A... 2002-07-30 08:28:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply caudlet 2002-07-30 15:34:43 UTC Re: Power Supply kilroy2k1 2002-07-30 15:38:43 UTC Re: Power Supply caudlet 2002-07-30 16:14:54 UTC Re: Power Supply Doug Fortune 2002-07-30 19:30:24 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply MIKEC@W... 2002-07-30 20:56:07 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply kilroy2k1 2002-07-31 16:42:37 UTC Re: Power Supply studleylee 2002-07-31 17:11:48 UTC Re: Power Supply Jon Elson 2002-07-31 20:23:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply JanRwl@A... 2002-07-31 21:58:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply JanRwl@A... 2002-07-31 22:20:04 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply studleylee 2002-08-01 09:41:38 UTC Re: Power Supply bdrmachine 2002-09-02 06:42:45 UTC Power Supply Robert Campbell 2002-09-02 07:17:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply studleylee 2002-09-02 17:36:14 UTC Re: Power Supply bdrmachine 2002-09-03 14:18:45 UTC Re: Power Supply Doug Fortune 2002-12-14 17:07:58 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply C.S. Mo 2002-12-14 17:37:42 UTC Re(2): [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply Raymond Heckert 2002-12-14 22:12:38 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply rpbfire 2003-11-20 14:26:17 UTC Power Supply brouwer@e... 2003-11-20 17:38:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply Jon Elson 2003-11-20 22:00:10 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply rpbfire 2003-11-21 06:58:00 UTC Re: Power Supply rpbfire 2003-11-23 06:12:57 UTC Re: Power Supply Fernando 2004-01-31 19:30:17 UTC Power Supply Raymond Heckert 2004-02-02 20:34:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply John Delaney 2004-02-03 17:16:57 UTC Re: Power Supply claudinei vilela 2004-02-04 07:57:24 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply John Johnson 2004-02-04 13:21:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply Fernando 2004-02-05 09:14:48 UTC Re: Power Supply Ron K 2004-07-02 18:49:28 UTC Power Supply Robert Campbell 2004-07-02 20:07:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply caudlet 2004-07-02 20:18:12 UTC Re: Power Supply Ron K 2004-07-02 20:18:56 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply Ron K 2004-07-02 20:44:55 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply Jon Elson 2004-07-02 23:33:38 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply ballendo 2004-07-03 07:38:16 UTC Re: Power Supply Ron K 2004-07-03 10:03:05 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply Larry Wright 2004-07-05 18:51:07 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply John Delaney 2004-07-05 19:33:39 UTC Re: Power Supply John Delaney 2004-07-05 19:45:41 UTC Re: Power Supply David A. Frantz 2004-07-05 21:31:09 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply Jon Elson 2004-07-06 10:35:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply Fred Smith 2004-07-06 13:17:01 UTC Transformer, was Re: Power Supply Rose, Gary 2004-07-13 05:34:58 UTC Re: Re: Power Supply Dan Mauch 2004-07-13 06:19:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Power Supply Ron Ginger 2005-08-04 14:51:40 UTC Power Supply caudlet 2005-08-04 14:59:46 UTC Re: Power Supply