Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
Posted by
Larry Wright
on 2004-07-05 18:51:07 UTC
--- Ron K <godsone@...> wrote:
the point of running stepper motors at current levels
above there rating.
What I read says that every time the current level
exceeds the rated level it has the effect of
demagnitizing the motor,deterorating the torque that
the motor is capible of.
I can't say that this is true for all motors or at
all, but I read it. If there is a magnet inside the
motor it makes sence.
Larry Wright
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
>There is something I read that is very important to
the point of running stepper motors at current levels
above there rating.
What I read says that every time the current level
exceeds the rated level it has the effect of
demagnitizing the motor,deterorating the torque that
the motor is capible of.
I can't say that this is true for all motors or at
all, but I read it. If there is a magnet inside the
motor it makes sence.
Larry Wright
>=== message truncated ===
> ballendo wrote:
>
> >Hello,
> >
> >Didn't see this mentioned yet...
> >
> >WHY are you running 6.1 amp motors at 7 amps???
> >
> Because on 6 amps the motors never warmed up at all
> .
> With them set at 7 they will come up to just
> slightly warm but defiantly
> not hot during a long run ( 1 or 2 hours )
> and the Geckos also run very cool .
>
> > Do yourself and the
> >motors a favor and get the resistors in the geckos
> to limit the
> >current to the rated value. Unless you feel your
> motor design skills
> >exceed those of the mfr... (Would you exceed
> redline of your
> >automobile engine "for months"???)
> >
> >The side benefits will include longer motor life,
> cooler operation,
> >and smoother motor rotation. Excess amps might help
> an ego, but not a
> >motor.
> >
> >Next, motors are BOTH motor and generator anytime
> they are turning...
> >
> >Factor in what the turning motor is adding to the
> supply for
> >the "other" motors to use and you might have
> another part of your
> >answer
> >
> >Hope this helps,
> >
> >Ballendo
> >
> >
> >
> >--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Ron K
> <godsone@e...> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>caudlet wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>SNIP
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>In reality the 5amp fuse was a mistake I thought
> I had put in a
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>10amp but the system has been running like this
> for several
> >>>
> >>>
> >months .
> >
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>--
> >>>>Ron Kline
> >>>>
> >>>>American Precision Ceramics
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>Ron what you are seeing is reality vs theory.
> There are a lot of
> >>>factors that may be at work here. The motors
> Average current
> >>>
> >>>
> >which
> >
> >
> >>>is the Gecko 7 A limit times the duty factor is
> evidently a lot
> >>>
> >>>
> >less
> >
> >
> >>>than the nameplate rating. If a motor only needs
> 20% of the pulse
> >>>width to move the load then the AVERAGE current
> over time is only
> >>>20%. Since things like transformers and fuses can
> withstand short
> >>>periods of 100% overloads the 5A fuse could
> easily handle 10A at
> >>>
> >>>
> >50%
> >
> >
> >>>duty cycle.
> >>>
> >>>The only real way to test is put a DC ammeter in
> the DC line in
> >>>series with the load and do some measurements. A
> current probe on
> >>>
> >>>
> >a
> >
> >
> >>>scope would give you the real picture from a
> dynamic perspective.
> >>>
> >>>
> >You
> >
> >
> >>>might be surprised to see how much less the
> current draw is on
> >>>average than you would calculate from the motor
> specs.
> >>>
> >>>If you run mostly two axis moves then two motors
> would probably
> >>>
> >>>
> >only
> >
> >
> >>>draw 8 to 10 amps worst case. Sounds like you
> are not running the
> >>>motors anywhere near their max limits.
> >>>
> >>>Another good indicator is that things are
> probably not running
> >>>
> >>>
> >hot:
> >
> >
> >>>motors, power supply, etc are warm but not too
> hot to leave you
> >>>
> >>>
> >hand
> >
> >
> >>>on I would guess.
> >>>
> >>>Take it as good news and don't worry about it too
> much. The only
> >>>true way to design a power supply is to have the
> actual load in
> >>>
> >>>
> >the
> >
> >
> >>>actual conditions it runs in to measure then do
> the calculations.
> >>>Taking numbers off components and adding them all
> up will only get
> >>>you in the ballpark parking lot. We all tend to
> overdesign the
> >>>
> >>>
> >power
> >
> >
> >>>supply because of the fear of putting a lot of
> time and effort
> >>>
> >>>
> >into
> >
> >
> >>>something that ends up being too small and to
> combat Murphy's Law.
> >>>
> >>>The good news is that your power supply will last
> a long time.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Now that is an explination I can understand
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Discussion Thread
Ozzie@h...
2000-10-01 06:35:33 UTC
Power Supply
Jon Elson
2000-10-01 22:09:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
Ozzie@h...
2000-11-19 20:01:57 UTC
Power Supply
Carlos Guillermo
2001-12-30 11:01:48 UTC
Power Supply
allan_reinhard
2001-12-30 12:55:37 UTC
Re: Power Supply
ka1bbg
2001-12-30 18:47:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
macfool68
2002-04-19 23:20:04 UTC
Re: Power Supply
Ray Henry
2002-04-20 05:32:11 UTC
Re: Re: Power Supply
Bill Vance
2002-04-20 12:30:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Power Supply
kilroy2k1
2002-07-29 20:11:21 UTC
Power Supply
mariss92705
2002-07-29 20:44:53 UTC
Re: Power Supply
MIKEC@W...
2002-07-29 21:29:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
JanRwl@A...
2002-07-30 08:28:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
caudlet
2002-07-30 15:34:43 UTC
Re: Power Supply
kilroy2k1
2002-07-30 15:38:43 UTC
Re: Power Supply
caudlet
2002-07-30 16:14:54 UTC
Re: Power Supply
Doug Fortune
2002-07-30 19:30:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
MIKEC@W...
2002-07-30 20:56:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
kilroy2k1
2002-07-31 16:42:37 UTC
Re: Power Supply
studleylee
2002-07-31 17:11:48 UTC
Re: Power Supply
Jon Elson
2002-07-31 20:23:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
JanRwl@A...
2002-07-31 21:58:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
JanRwl@A...
2002-07-31 22:20:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
studleylee
2002-08-01 09:41:38 UTC
Re: Power Supply
bdrmachine
2002-09-02 06:42:45 UTC
Power Supply
Robert Campbell
2002-09-02 07:17:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
studleylee
2002-09-02 17:36:14 UTC
Re: Power Supply
bdrmachine
2002-09-03 14:18:45 UTC
Re: Power Supply
Doug Fortune
2002-12-14 17:07:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
C.S. Mo
2002-12-14 17:37:42 UTC
Re(2): [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
Raymond Heckert
2002-12-14 22:12:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
rpbfire
2003-11-20 14:26:17 UTC
Power Supply
brouwer@e...
2003-11-20 17:38:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
Jon Elson
2003-11-20 22:00:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
rpbfire
2003-11-21 06:58:00 UTC
Re: Power Supply
rpbfire
2003-11-23 06:12:57 UTC
Re: Power Supply
Fernando
2004-01-31 19:30:17 UTC
Power Supply
Raymond Heckert
2004-02-02 20:34:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
John Delaney
2004-02-03 17:16:57 UTC
Re: Power Supply
claudinei vilela
2004-02-04 07:57:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
John Johnson
2004-02-04 13:21:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
Fernando
2004-02-05 09:14:48 UTC
Re: Power Supply
Ron K
2004-07-02 18:49:28 UTC
Power Supply
Robert Campbell
2004-07-02 20:07:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
caudlet
2004-07-02 20:18:12 UTC
Re: Power Supply
Ron K
2004-07-02 20:18:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
Ron K
2004-07-02 20:44:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
Jon Elson
2004-07-02 23:33:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
ballendo
2004-07-03 07:38:16 UTC
Re: Power Supply
Ron K
2004-07-03 10:03:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
Larry Wright
2004-07-05 18:51:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
John Delaney
2004-07-05 19:33:39 UTC
Re: Power Supply
John Delaney
2004-07-05 19:45:41 UTC
Re: Power Supply
David A. Frantz
2004-07-05 21:31:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
Jon Elson
2004-07-06 10:35:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
Fred Smith
2004-07-06 13:17:01 UTC
Transformer, was Re: Power Supply
Rose, Gary
2004-07-13 05:34:58 UTC
Re: Re: Power Supply
Dan Mauch
2004-07-13 06:19:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Power Supply
Ron Ginger
2005-08-04 14:51:40 UTC
Power Supply
caudlet
2005-08-04 14:59:46 UTC
Re: Power Supply