Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2004-07-02 23:33:38 UTC
Ron K wrote:
decelerating
rapidly, over and over again, I think you could eventually blow that 5 A
fuse.
It might take a while for it to heat up. At idle, the Gecko reduces
power to
the motors. Also, at idle, even if the current was not reduced, the
power input
to the motor is a maximum of 141% of 3.6 V x 7 A. This comes out to
35.5 W. Now, 35.5 W requires .74 A at 48 V. So, idling at full current,
each drive would draw .74 A, for a total of 2.2 A. When the motors are
spinning, and especially when driving a load, the current draw increases
dramatically, and would probably exced the 5 A fuse's nominal rating.
But, the way fuses are rated is that they must never blow at 100% of the
rated current, drawn indefinitely. And then, depending on the time
rating of the fuse, 200% of rated current should blow it in 2 seconds
(semiconductor fast blow) to 2 minutes (motor slow blow).
Jon
>Hi allIf you ran a CNC program that had all the motors accelerating and
>I have a question for the electronic guys out there .
>This is something that I have disagreed with for a long time, but I
>don't open my mouth until I have some facts to go with it .
>( I'm the try it and see if it works type , not the work it out on
>paper type )
>
>If I want to build a stepper control with the following specs how many
>amps do I need out of the transformer !!!
>
>3 Motors , Slo-Syn 840 oz size 42 3.6V 6.1A. ea.
>Using 3 Gecko 201 drives with no current set resistor ( set for 7 Amp max )
>Power supply puts out 49.5 Volts at idle and 48 with all motors turning .
>
> From what I have seen on the list this should require something like 12
>to 18 Amps !
>
>WEELLLLL I'm running this system on a Bridgeport clone called a
>Wizard and it is set up as follows .
>Power supply puts out 49.5 Volts at idle and 48 with all motors turning
>. ( this is checked at the cap )
>There is a single fast blow 5 amp fuse coming out of the capacitor and
>then a 4 amp fast blow fuse to each Gecko .
>I have never had any of these fuses blow so to me that would indicate
>that the entire system is drawing less than 5 amps DC .
> How can this be wrong ???
>
>In reality the 5amp fuse was a mistake I thought I had put in a 10amp but the system has been running like this for several months .
>
>
>
>
decelerating
rapidly, over and over again, I think you could eventually blow that 5 A
fuse.
It might take a while for it to heat up. At idle, the Gecko reduces
power to
the motors. Also, at idle, even if the current was not reduced, the
power input
to the motor is a maximum of 141% of 3.6 V x 7 A. This comes out to
35.5 W. Now, 35.5 W requires .74 A at 48 V. So, idling at full current,
each drive would draw .74 A, for a total of 2.2 A. When the motors are
spinning, and especially when driving a load, the current draw increases
dramatically, and would probably exced the 5 A fuse's nominal rating.
But, the way fuses are rated is that they must never blow at 100% of the
rated current, drawn indefinitely. And then, depending on the time
rating of the fuse, 200% of rated current should blow it in 2 seconds
(semiconductor fast blow) to 2 minutes (motor slow blow).
Jon
Discussion Thread
Ozzie@h...
2000-10-01 06:35:33 UTC
Power Supply
Jon Elson
2000-10-01 22:09:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
Ozzie@h...
2000-11-19 20:01:57 UTC
Power Supply
Carlos Guillermo
2001-12-30 11:01:48 UTC
Power Supply
allan_reinhard
2001-12-30 12:55:37 UTC
Re: Power Supply
ka1bbg
2001-12-30 18:47:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
macfool68
2002-04-19 23:20:04 UTC
Re: Power Supply
Ray Henry
2002-04-20 05:32:11 UTC
Re: Re: Power Supply
Bill Vance
2002-04-20 12:30:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Power Supply
kilroy2k1
2002-07-29 20:11:21 UTC
Power Supply
mariss92705
2002-07-29 20:44:53 UTC
Re: Power Supply
MIKEC@W...
2002-07-29 21:29:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
JanRwl@A...
2002-07-30 08:28:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
caudlet
2002-07-30 15:34:43 UTC
Re: Power Supply
kilroy2k1
2002-07-30 15:38:43 UTC
Re: Power Supply
caudlet
2002-07-30 16:14:54 UTC
Re: Power Supply
Doug Fortune
2002-07-30 19:30:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
MIKEC@W...
2002-07-30 20:56:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
kilroy2k1
2002-07-31 16:42:37 UTC
Re: Power Supply
studleylee
2002-07-31 17:11:48 UTC
Re: Power Supply
Jon Elson
2002-07-31 20:23:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
JanRwl@A...
2002-07-31 21:58:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
JanRwl@A...
2002-07-31 22:20:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
studleylee
2002-08-01 09:41:38 UTC
Re: Power Supply
bdrmachine
2002-09-02 06:42:45 UTC
Power Supply
Robert Campbell
2002-09-02 07:17:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
studleylee
2002-09-02 17:36:14 UTC
Re: Power Supply
bdrmachine
2002-09-03 14:18:45 UTC
Re: Power Supply
Doug Fortune
2002-12-14 17:07:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
C.S. Mo
2002-12-14 17:37:42 UTC
Re(2): [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
Raymond Heckert
2002-12-14 22:12:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
rpbfire
2003-11-20 14:26:17 UTC
Power Supply
brouwer@e...
2003-11-20 17:38:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
Jon Elson
2003-11-20 22:00:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
rpbfire
2003-11-21 06:58:00 UTC
Re: Power Supply
rpbfire
2003-11-23 06:12:57 UTC
Re: Power Supply
Fernando
2004-01-31 19:30:17 UTC
Power Supply
Raymond Heckert
2004-02-02 20:34:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
John Delaney
2004-02-03 17:16:57 UTC
Re: Power Supply
claudinei vilela
2004-02-04 07:57:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
John Johnson
2004-02-04 13:21:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
Fernando
2004-02-05 09:14:48 UTC
Re: Power Supply
Ron K
2004-07-02 18:49:28 UTC
Power Supply
Robert Campbell
2004-07-02 20:07:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
caudlet
2004-07-02 20:18:12 UTC
Re: Power Supply
Ron K
2004-07-02 20:18:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
Ron K
2004-07-02 20:44:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
Jon Elson
2004-07-02 23:33:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
ballendo
2004-07-03 07:38:16 UTC
Re: Power Supply
Ron K
2004-07-03 10:03:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
Larry Wright
2004-07-05 18:51:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
John Delaney
2004-07-05 19:33:39 UTC
Re: Power Supply
John Delaney
2004-07-05 19:45:41 UTC
Re: Power Supply
David A. Frantz
2004-07-05 21:31:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
Jon Elson
2004-07-06 10:35:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
Fred Smith
2004-07-06 13:17:01 UTC
Transformer, was Re: Power Supply
Rose, Gary
2004-07-13 05:34:58 UTC
Re: Re: Power Supply
Dan Mauch
2004-07-13 06:19:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Power Supply
Ron Ginger
2005-08-04 14:51:40 UTC
Power Supply
caudlet
2005-08-04 14:59:46 UTC
Re: Power Supply