Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
Posted by
Ron K
on 2004-07-02 20:44:55 UTC
caudlet wrote:
Thanks
--
Ron Kline
American Precision Ceramics
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> SNIPNow that is an explination I can understand
>
>>In reality the 5amp fuse was a mistake I thought I had put in a
>>
>>
>10amp but the system has been running like this for several months .
>
>
>>--
>>Ron Kline
>>
>>American Precision Ceramics
>>
>>
>
>Ron what you are seeing is reality vs theory. There are a lot of
>factors that may be at work here. The motors Average current which
>is the Gecko 7 A limit times the duty factor is evidently a lot less
>than the nameplate rating. If a motor only needs 20% of the pulse
>width to move the load then the AVERAGE current over time is only
>20%. Since things like transformers and fuses can withstand short
>periods of 100% overloads the 5A fuse could easily handle 10A at 50%
>duty cycle.
>
>The only real way to test is put a DC ammeter in the DC line in
>series with the load and do some measurements. A current probe on a
>scope would give you the real picture from a dynamic perspective. You
>might be surprised to see how much less the current draw is on
>average than you would calculate from the motor specs.
>
>If you run mostly two axis moves then two motors would probably only
>draw 8 to 10 amps worst case. Sounds like you are not running the
>motors anywhere near their max limits.
>
>Another good indicator is that things are probably not running hot:
>motors, power supply, etc are warm but not too hot to leave you hand
>on I would guess.
>
>Take it as good news and don't worry about it too much. The only
>true way to design a power supply is to have the actual load in the
>actual conditions it runs in to measure then do the calculations.
>Taking numbers off components and adding them all up will only get
>you in the ballpark parking lot. We all tend to overdesign the power
>supply because of the fear of putting a lot of time and effort into
>something that ends up being too small and to combat Murphy's Law.
>
>The good news is that your power supply will last a long time.
>
>
>
Thanks
--
Ron Kline
American Precision Ceramics
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
Ozzie@h...
2000-10-01 06:35:33 UTC
Power Supply
Jon Elson
2000-10-01 22:09:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
Ozzie@h...
2000-11-19 20:01:57 UTC
Power Supply
Carlos Guillermo
2001-12-30 11:01:48 UTC
Power Supply
allan_reinhard
2001-12-30 12:55:37 UTC
Re: Power Supply
ka1bbg
2001-12-30 18:47:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
macfool68
2002-04-19 23:20:04 UTC
Re: Power Supply
Ray Henry
2002-04-20 05:32:11 UTC
Re: Re: Power Supply
Bill Vance
2002-04-20 12:30:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Power Supply
kilroy2k1
2002-07-29 20:11:21 UTC
Power Supply
mariss92705
2002-07-29 20:44:53 UTC
Re: Power Supply
MIKEC@W...
2002-07-29 21:29:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
JanRwl@A...
2002-07-30 08:28:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
caudlet
2002-07-30 15:34:43 UTC
Re: Power Supply
kilroy2k1
2002-07-30 15:38:43 UTC
Re: Power Supply
caudlet
2002-07-30 16:14:54 UTC
Re: Power Supply
Doug Fortune
2002-07-30 19:30:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
MIKEC@W...
2002-07-30 20:56:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
kilroy2k1
2002-07-31 16:42:37 UTC
Re: Power Supply
studleylee
2002-07-31 17:11:48 UTC
Re: Power Supply
Jon Elson
2002-07-31 20:23:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
JanRwl@A...
2002-07-31 21:58:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
JanRwl@A...
2002-07-31 22:20:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
studleylee
2002-08-01 09:41:38 UTC
Re: Power Supply
bdrmachine
2002-09-02 06:42:45 UTC
Power Supply
Robert Campbell
2002-09-02 07:17:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
studleylee
2002-09-02 17:36:14 UTC
Re: Power Supply
bdrmachine
2002-09-03 14:18:45 UTC
Re: Power Supply
Doug Fortune
2002-12-14 17:07:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
C.S. Mo
2002-12-14 17:37:42 UTC
Re(2): [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
Raymond Heckert
2002-12-14 22:12:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
rpbfire
2003-11-20 14:26:17 UTC
Power Supply
brouwer@e...
2003-11-20 17:38:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
Jon Elson
2003-11-20 22:00:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
rpbfire
2003-11-21 06:58:00 UTC
Re: Power Supply
rpbfire
2003-11-23 06:12:57 UTC
Re: Power Supply
Fernando
2004-01-31 19:30:17 UTC
Power Supply
Raymond Heckert
2004-02-02 20:34:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
John Delaney
2004-02-03 17:16:57 UTC
Re: Power Supply
claudinei vilela
2004-02-04 07:57:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
John Johnson
2004-02-04 13:21:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
Fernando
2004-02-05 09:14:48 UTC
Re: Power Supply
Ron K
2004-07-02 18:49:28 UTC
Power Supply
Robert Campbell
2004-07-02 20:07:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
caudlet
2004-07-02 20:18:12 UTC
Re: Power Supply
Ron K
2004-07-02 20:18:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
Ron K
2004-07-02 20:44:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
Jon Elson
2004-07-02 23:33:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power Supply
ballendo
2004-07-03 07:38:16 UTC
Re: Power Supply
Ron K
2004-07-03 10:03:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
Larry Wright
2004-07-05 18:51:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
John Delaney
2004-07-05 19:33:39 UTC
Re: Power Supply
John Delaney
2004-07-05 19:45:41 UTC
Re: Power Supply
David A. Frantz
2004-07-05 21:31:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
Jon Elson
2004-07-06 10:35:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power Supply
Fred Smith
2004-07-06 13:17:01 UTC
Transformer, was Re: Power Supply
Rose, Gary
2004-07-13 05:34:58 UTC
Re: Re: Power Supply
Dan Mauch
2004-07-13 06:19:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Power Supply
Ron Ginger
2005-08-04 14:51:40 UTC
Power Supply
caudlet
2005-08-04 14:59:46 UTC
Re: Power Supply