CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.

Posted by Polaraligned
on 2005-02-04 13:04:36 UTC
Using your example
> of Z table weight I think your numbers are off. I think an empty Z
> weighs a couple of hundred pounds, and fully loaded with vises part
> ect, specs out at 750 lbs. So unless you added 300 to 400 lbs weight
> to your table to test it, you do not have real numbers yet.


Shipping weights from Bridgeport:

Knee 257#
Saddle 142#
48" table 365#

Total= 764#

The number for the table sounds a bit high. My 42" table I can
pick up and carry. I guess it is about 200#. Their weight maybe
includes leadscrews and all.


Scott









>
>
> Wally
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, R Rogers <rogersmach@y...>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > cnc_4_me <cnc4me@g...> wrote:
> > Since you are running the motor aprox 38% below rated voltage you
> > cannot push the amps thru the motor to get full torque.
> >
> > I left out the current ratting before but here it is 18.5 amp.
> > Armature resistance would be 130vdc / 18.5A = 7 ohm. At 80vdc and 7
> > ohm you can only make 11.4 amps. The torque per amp is 373 0z-in /
> > 18.5 = 20 oz-in. At 11.4 amps max current you get 11.4 x 20 oz-in =
> > 230 oz-in.
> >
> > If we use your speed reduction number above 61.5% and multiply it
> > times the torque of 373 oz-in we get 229.4 oz-in. Seems to agree
> > with ohms law calcs.
> >
> > Wally
> >
> > /// Isn't it possible that delivering the volts and current by
> another means than a continual supply as is the case with a pulse
> stream, that the current delivered in tiny spikes rather than a
> continuous flow would counter the resistance of the windings? We're
> not running these motors at top speed either, and very rarely do.
> Would that also effect the resistance? All calculations aside, when I
> first started looking at B'port retrofit packages such as Ajax, they
> all told me a 28 lb-in motor was too small to drive the knee and that
> a 40 lb-in servo would be imperative. And nothing was guaranteed
> especially the Z motor. I'm running a 100 volt 13.7 continual amps
> servo rated at 40 lb -in torque rating with a 64 VDC supply. Using
> the above calcualtion, I'm only getting 64% of the stated torque.
> Which is 25.6 lb-in. It drives the Z at 60 ipm just as Ajax claimed a
> 40 lb-in motor would at full voltage. Calculations and theories
> aside, it works. Remember,the knee table and vise weigh
> > approximately 800 lbs. then add a few hundred pounds force of a
> drillbit plunging steel. The little Gecko320 tolrates this, much to
> my amazement. ///Ron
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Addresses:
> > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> > Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@a...,
> timg@k...
> > Moderator: pentam@c... indigo_red@q... davemucha@j... [Moderators]
> > URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> >
> > OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> > If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach
> it if you have trouble.
> > http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be
> a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are
> there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
> >
> > NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING
> THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> > bill
> > List Mom
> > List Owner
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Discussion Thread

cnc_4_me 2005-02-03 22:32:41 UTC Declining motor torque with lower voltage. turbulatordude 2005-02-04 06:07:16 UTC Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage. Stephen Wille Padnos 2005-02-04 06:55:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Declining motor torque with lower voltage. cnc_4_me 2005-02-04 07:46:41 UTC Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage. Stephen Wille Padnos 2005-02-04 08:29:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage. victorlorenzo@y... 2005-02-04 08:45:44 UTC Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage. Jon Elson 2005-02-04 09:17:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Declining motor torque with lower voltage. R Rogers 2005-02-04 09:26:05 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage. cnc_4_me 2005-02-04 10:49:00 UTC Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage. R Rogers 2005-02-04 12:20:04 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage. R Rogers 2005-02-04 12:37:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage. cnc_4_me 2005-02-04 12:52:05 UTC Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage. Polaraligned 2005-02-04 13:04:36 UTC Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage. cnc_4_me 2005-02-04 13:06:56 UTC Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage. cnc_4_me 2005-02-04 13:19:24 UTC Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage. R Rogers 2005-02-04 13:29:22 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage. cnc_4_me 2005-02-04 15:02:22 UTC Z axis force R Rogers 2005-02-04 15:43:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Z axis force cnc_4_me 2005-02-04 15:50:19 UTC Re: Z axis force R Rogers 2005-02-04 16:00:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Z axis force R Rogers 2005-02-04 16:36:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Z axis force cnc_4_me 2005-02-04 17:04:47 UTC Re: Z axis force cnc_4_me 2005-02-04 17:09:45 UTC Re: Z axis force R Rogers 2005-02-04 17:59:19 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Z axis force cnc_4_me 2005-02-04 18:23:13 UTC Re: Z axis force Jon Elson 2005-02-04 19:36:30 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage. Stephen Wille Padnos 2005-02-04 20:00:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage. Jon Elson 2005-02-04 20:09:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage. cnc_4_me 2005-02-04 20:45:22 UTC Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage. Stephen Wille Padnos 2005-02-04 21:52:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage. Polaraligned 2005-02-05 05:27:02 UTC Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage. Lance Hopper 2005-02-05 06:15:18 UTC Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage. R Rogers 2005-02-05 07:08:03 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage. cnc_4_me 2005-02-05 11:11:22 UTC Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage. cnc_4_me 2005-02-05 11:18:10 UTC Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage. R Rogers 2005-02-05 14:28:48 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage. Jon Elson 2005-02-05 17:15:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage. Jon Elson 2005-02-05 17:28:49 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage. Jon Elson 2005-02-05 17:52:25 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage. R Rogers 2005-02-05 18:08:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.