Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
Posted by
cnc_4_me
on 2005-02-04 13:19:24 UTC
I was talking a 9 x 42 bridgport knee...Big difference wow....
I have not learned the calculations for force thru a ballscrew yet.
That would tell us how much torque you really need...
Wally
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Polaraligned"
<polaraligned@o...> wrote:
I have not learned the calculations for force thru a ballscrew yet.
That would tell us how much torque you really need...
Wally
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Polaraligned"
<polaraligned@o...> wrote:
>Z
>
> Using your example
> > of Z table weight I think your numbers are off. I think an empty
> > weighs a couple of hundred pounds, and fully loaded with visespart
> > ect, specs out at 750 lbs. So unless you added 300 to 400 lbsweight
> > to your table to test it, you do not have real numbers yet.<rogersmach@y...>
>
>
> Shipping weights from Bridgeport:
>
> Knee 257#
> Saddle 142#
> 48" table 365#
>
> Total= 764#
>
> The number for the table sounds a bit high. My 42" table I can
> pick up and carry. I guess it is about 200#. Their weight maybe
> includes leadscrews and all.
>
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > Wally
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, R Rogers
> > wrote:you
> > >
> > >
> > > cnc_4_me <cnc4me@g...> wrote:
> > > Since you are running the motor aprox 38% below rated voltage
> > > cannot push the amps thru the motor to get full torque.and 7
> > >
> > > I left out the current ratting before but here it is 18.5 amp.
> > > Armature resistance would be 130vdc / 18.5A = 7 ohm. At 80vdc
> > > ohm you can only make 11.4 amps. The torque per amp is 373 0z-in /
> > > 18.5 = 20 oz-in. At 11.4 amps max current you get 11.4 x 20 oz-in =
> > > 230 oz-in.it
> > >
> > > If we use your speed reduction number above 61.5% and multiply
> > > times the torque of 373 oz-in we get 229.4 oz-in. Seems toagree
> > > with ohms law calcs.We're
> > >
> > > Wally
> > >
> > > /// Isn't it possible that delivering the volts and current by
> > another means than a continual supply as is the case with a pulse
> > stream, that the current delivered in tiny spikes rather than a
> > continuous flow would counter the resistance of the windings?
> > not running these motors at top speed either, and very rarely do.when I
> > Would that also effect the resistance? All calculations aside,
> > first started looking at B'port retrofit packages such as Ajax,they
> > all told me a 28 lb-in motor was too small to drive the knee andthat
> > a 40 lb-in servo would be imperative. And nothing was guaranteedamps
> > especially the Z motor. I'm running a 100 volt 13.7 continual
> > servo rated at 40 lb -in torque rating with a 64 VDC supply.Using
> > the above calcualtion, I'm only getting 64% of the stated torque.claimed a
> > Which is 25.6 lb-in. It drives the Z at 60 ipm just as Ajax
> > 40 lb-in motor would at full voltage. Calculations and theoriesa
> > aside, it works. Remember,the knee table and vise weigh
> > > approximately 800 lbs. then add a few hundred pounds force of
> > drillbit plunging steel. The little Gecko320 tolrates this, muchto
> > my amazement. ///Ronwanliker@a...,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Addresses:
> > > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > > FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> > > Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com,
> > timg@k...[Moderators]
> > > Moderator: pentam@c... indigo_red@q... davemucha@j...
> > > URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DROreach
> > >
> > > OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> > > If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> > aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to
> > it if you have trouble.to be
> > > http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
> > >
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this
> > a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members arePOSTING
> > there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
> > >
> > > NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY
> > THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NOEXCEPTIONS........
> > > bill
> > > List Mom
> > > List Owner
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
cnc_4_me
2005-02-03 22:32:41 UTC
Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
turbulatordude
2005-02-04 06:07:16 UTC
Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
Stephen Wille Padnos
2005-02-04 06:55:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
cnc_4_me
2005-02-04 07:46:41 UTC
Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
Stephen Wille Padnos
2005-02-04 08:29:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
victorlorenzo@y...
2005-02-04 08:45:44 UTC
Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
Jon Elson
2005-02-04 09:17:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
R Rogers
2005-02-04 09:26:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
cnc_4_me
2005-02-04 10:49:00 UTC
Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
R Rogers
2005-02-04 12:20:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
R Rogers
2005-02-04 12:37:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
cnc_4_me
2005-02-04 12:52:05 UTC
Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
Polaraligned
2005-02-04 13:04:36 UTC
Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
cnc_4_me
2005-02-04 13:06:56 UTC
Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
cnc_4_me
2005-02-04 13:19:24 UTC
Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
R Rogers
2005-02-04 13:29:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
cnc_4_me
2005-02-04 15:02:22 UTC
Z axis force
R Rogers
2005-02-04 15:43:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Z axis force
cnc_4_me
2005-02-04 15:50:19 UTC
Re: Z axis force
R Rogers
2005-02-04 16:00:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Z axis force
R Rogers
2005-02-04 16:36:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Z axis force
cnc_4_me
2005-02-04 17:04:47 UTC
Re: Z axis force
cnc_4_me
2005-02-04 17:09:45 UTC
Re: Z axis force
R Rogers
2005-02-04 17:59:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Z axis force
cnc_4_me
2005-02-04 18:23:13 UTC
Re: Z axis force
Jon Elson
2005-02-04 19:36:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
Stephen Wille Padnos
2005-02-04 20:00:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
Jon Elson
2005-02-04 20:09:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
cnc_4_me
2005-02-04 20:45:22 UTC
Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
Stephen Wille Padnos
2005-02-04 21:52:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
Polaraligned
2005-02-05 05:27:02 UTC
Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
Lance Hopper
2005-02-05 06:15:18 UTC
Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
R Rogers
2005-02-05 07:08:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
cnc_4_me
2005-02-05 11:11:22 UTC
Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
cnc_4_me
2005-02-05 11:18:10 UTC
Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
R Rogers
2005-02-05 14:28:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
Jon Elson
2005-02-05 17:15:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
Jon Elson
2005-02-05 17:28:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
Jon Elson
2005-02-05 17:52:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.
R Rogers
2005-02-05 18:08:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Declining motor torque with lower voltage.