Re: Gearhead motors ? future drives ?
Posted by
turbulatordude
on 2005-05-14 18:57:02 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Polaraligned"
<polaraligned@o...> wrote:
but, a well built machine today will work for 10 years.
If you can get the performance out of todays machines, why wait for
tomorrow ?
Also, it appears that there is no expansion of power, just refinement
of methods, so next years crop of motors and drivers will not be
offering or delivering more power.
The only exception to that is hybred steppers.
Stepper motors will still have power limits and even the new encoder
steppers will slow down to get the work done whereas a bigger servo
would just never skip a beat.
I think the real question is 'what do you need in a drive"?
Then what is missing. Then ask how to get that feature.
The slowing of the stepper to keep in motion and the interaction of
the spindle cutter still needs to be addressed.
USB is a dead end currently unless someone has modified Mach2 to
output to the USB port ?
And, one the USB physical layer is in place, it will need to be
addressed by some year or two of buggy software. Both on the
interface board and MACH2.
The FUTURE is called that because it is not here, it is out there.
USB is around the corner, but no one knows how long the block is till
we reach that corner.
In the mean time, tens of thousands of drives will be put into
service. and thousands of machines will come to life and many
thousands more will make parts.
If you watched the G201a relased and said, I'll wait until it is
bullet proof, then that 5 year wait is almost over. (when was the
G201 introduced ?)
My guess is that SOLID mainstream use of the USB is still 3 years away.
Those who watched know the project was called the G2002 for the year
it was started.
Dave
<polaraligned@o...> wrote:
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, R Rogers <rogersmach@y...>wrote:
>As I see it, no matter what you use today, it will be eclipsed in a year.
> > P.S. I gotta stop giving these encoders away :-), Mach4 is under
> development and they are talking about 6 million pulses per second
> through the USB. Should be released in beta in a few months.
> >
> > Ron
>
> That's great. But as I was trying to get out of Mariss, is
> he is working on the next generation of servo drives or just
> sticking with steppers. How is the USB port going to interface
> with his servo drives?
>
> Scott
but, a well built machine today will work for 10 years.
If you can get the performance out of todays machines, why wait for
tomorrow ?
Also, it appears that there is no expansion of power, just refinement
of methods, so next years crop of motors and drivers will not be
offering or delivering more power.
The only exception to that is hybred steppers.
Stepper motors will still have power limits and even the new encoder
steppers will slow down to get the work done whereas a bigger servo
would just never skip a beat.
I think the real question is 'what do you need in a drive"?
Then what is missing. Then ask how to get that feature.
The slowing of the stepper to keep in motion and the interaction of
the spindle cutter still needs to be addressed.
USB is a dead end currently unless someone has modified Mach2 to
output to the USB port ?
And, one the USB physical layer is in place, it will need to be
addressed by some year or two of buggy software. Both on the
interface board and MACH2.
The FUTURE is called that because it is not here, it is out there.
USB is around the corner, but no one knows how long the block is till
we reach that corner.
In the mean time, tens of thousands of drives will be put into
service. and thousands of machines will come to life and many
thousands more will make parts.
If you watched the G201a relased and said, I'll wait until it is
bullet proof, then that 5 year wait is almost over. (when was the
G201 introduced ?)
My guess is that SOLID mainstream use of the USB is still 3 years away.
Those who watched know the project was called the G2002 for the year
it was started.
Dave
Discussion Thread
turbulatordude
2005-05-14 13:27:43 UTC
Gearhead motors ?
R Rogers
2005-05-14 13:52:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gearhead motors ?
KM6VV
2005-05-14 13:53:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gearhead motors ?
Polaraligned
2005-05-14 16:31:52 UTC
Re: Gearhead motors ?
turbulatordude
2005-05-14 18:57:02 UTC
Re: Gearhead motors ? future drives ?
washcomp
2005-05-14 19:47:14 UTC
Re: Gearhead motors ? future drives ?
R Rogers
2005-05-15 07:02:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gearhead motors ?
turbulatordude
2005-05-15 07:26:14 UTC
Re: Gearhead motors ? future drives ?
cnc_4_me
2005-05-15 07:44:36 UTC
Mod Bus was: Re: Gearhead motors ? future drives ?
DP
2005-05-15 08:07:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Mod Bus was: Re: Gearhead motors ? future drives ?
turbulatordude
2005-05-15 08:23:15 UTC
Mod Bus was: Re: Gearhead motors ? future drives ?
vrsculptor
2005-05-15 13:17:55 UTC
Re: Gearhead motors ? future drives ?
turbulatordude
2005-05-15 18:27:42 UTC
Re: Gearhead motors ? future drives ?
vrsculptor
2005-05-15 20:00:51 UTC
Re: Gearhead motors ? future drives ?
turbulatordude
2005-05-15 22:09:39 UTC
Re: Gearhead motors ? future drives ?
Polaraligned
2005-05-16 03:22:26 UTC
Encoder resolution
Polaraligned
2005-05-16 03:28:35 UTC
Re: Gearhead motors ?
Polaraligned
2005-05-16 03:33:32 UTC
Re: Encoder resolution
Les Newell
2005-05-16 05:58:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoder resolution
turbulatordude
2005-05-16 06:52:00 UTC
Re: Gearhead motors ? next-gen software
Fred Smith
2005-05-16 08:08:05 UTC
Re: Gearhead motors ? future drives ?
m0nkey0ne
2005-05-16 11:43:04 UTC
Re: Gearhead motors ? future drives ?
turbulatordude
2005-05-16 13:59:27 UTC
Re: Gearhead motors ? future drives ?
Polaraligned
2005-05-16 14:04:08 UTC
Re: Encoder resolution
caudlet
2005-05-16 14:24:20 UTC
Re: Encoder resolution
Les Newell
2005-05-16 15:05:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoder resolution
Jon Elson
2005-05-16 18:27:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoder resolution
Jon Elson
2005-05-16 18:33:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoder resolution