Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoder resolution
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2005-05-16 18:33:13 UTC
Les Newell wrote:
following
error at rest, and another factor proportional to velocity. The
instantaneous
allowable following error is the sum of the two. So, the faster you
command it to
go, the greater the allowable error. This allows for very small error
when moving
slowly, but allows a much larger error on rapid feeds. These two
parameters are
user-settable, and different for each axis, so you can set it as tight
or as loose as
you like.
Jon
>Hi Scott,EMC has a continuously sliding scale. it has one setting for allowable
>
>The lock range is not adjustable on the current models. I believe it
>will be on the new range.
>Either way you can work around it with tuning. You cannot have as
>aggressive acceleration with Geckos but does that really matter? Unless
>you are doing heavy production work the overall machining time
>difference is negligible.
>
>Of course the ideal is a true servo operation where the computer can
>have two different following error limits, one for rapids and one for
>cutting. AFAIK the only hobby controller capable of this is EMC.
>
>
following
error at rest, and another factor proportional to velocity. The
instantaneous
allowable following error is the sum of the two. So, the faster you
command it to
go, the greater the allowable error. This allows for very small error
when moving
slowly, but allows a much larger error on rapid feeds. These two
parameters are
user-settable, and different for each axis, so you can set it as tight
or as loose as
you like.
Jon
Discussion Thread
turbulatordude
2005-05-14 13:27:43 UTC
Gearhead motors ?
R Rogers
2005-05-14 13:52:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gearhead motors ?
KM6VV
2005-05-14 13:53:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gearhead motors ?
Polaraligned
2005-05-14 16:31:52 UTC
Re: Gearhead motors ?
turbulatordude
2005-05-14 18:57:02 UTC
Re: Gearhead motors ? future drives ?
washcomp
2005-05-14 19:47:14 UTC
Re: Gearhead motors ? future drives ?
R Rogers
2005-05-15 07:02:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gearhead motors ?
turbulatordude
2005-05-15 07:26:14 UTC
Re: Gearhead motors ? future drives ?
cnc_4_me
2005-05-15 07:44:36 UTC
Mod Bus was: Re: Gearhead motors ? future drives ?
DP
2005-05-15 08:07:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Mod Bus was: Re: Gearhead motors ? future drives ?
turbulatordude
2005-05-15 08:23:15 UTC
Mod Bus was: Re: Gearhead motors ? future drives ?
vrsculptor
2005-05-15 13:17:55 UTC
Re: Gearhead motors ? future drives ?
turbulatordude
2005-05-15 18:27:42 UTC
Re: Gearhead motors ? future drives ?
vrsculptor
2005-05-15 20:00:51 UTC
Re: Gearhead motors ? future drives ?
turbulatordude
2005-05-15 22:09:39 UTC
Re: Gearhead motors ? future drives ?
Polaraligned
2005-05-16 03:22:26 UTC
Encoder resolution
Polaraligned
2005-05-16 03:28:35 UTC
Re: Gearhead motors ?
Polaraligned
2005-05-16 03:33:32 UTC
Re: Encoder resolution
Les Newell
2005-05-16 05:58:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoder resolution
turbulatordude
2005-05-16 06:52:00 UTC
Re: Gearhead motors ? next-gen software
Fred Smith
2005-05-16 08:08:05 UTC
Re: Gearhead motors ? future drives ?
m0nkey0ne
2005-05-16 11:43:04 UTC
Re: Gearhead motors ? future drives ?
turbulatordude
2005-05-16 13:59:27 UTC
Re: Gearhead motors ? future drives ?
Polaraligned
2005-05-16 14:04:08 UTC
Re: Encoder resolution
caudlet
2005-05-16 14:24:20 UTC
Re: Encoder resolution
Les Newell
2005-05-16 15:05:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoder resolution
Jon Elson
2005-05-16 18:27:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoder resolution
Jon Elson
2005-05-16 18:33:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoder resolution