RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Variable Transformer

The original question only "required" a yes or no, but my follow up, which
asked "why", required more, if it was to be answered.

And my own philosophy when answering questions is to always try to tell
someone why-otherwise they have really only learned my opinion.

Again, your message below indicates that you THINK it is a bad idea, but you
give no proof or reasons.

Andy Wander
Verrex Corporation

-----Original Message-----
From: caedave [mailto:caedave@...]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 4:32 AM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Variable Transformer

The question asked only required a Yes or No answer. The fact that many
members went on to explain why (technically or comically) is surly a good
thing, just to ensure the dangers where made known.

Dave M.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andy Wander" <awander@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 10:58 PM
Subject: RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Variable Transformer


> Tony:
>
> Maybe, like me, he wanted an "answer" instead of a "warning".
>
> Reminds me of the bumper stickers that say "If you have to ask, you
> wouldn't
> understand".
>
> I thought the groups were about getting answers to questions, and not just
> being ridiculed or beaten into submission.
>
> I don't mean to say that that is what you are doing, but there does seem
> to
> be an undercurrent of that in the threads about the autotransformer.
>
> Andy Wander
> Verrex Corporation