CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current

Posted by Jon Elson
on 2005-10-24 18:46:43 UTC
Jarrett & Heidi Johnson wrote:

>Our (K142C) Constant Current Source systems sense the drop in current and
>increase the voltage to the motor and thus the current and power is
>maintained with higher speeds. A common motor we tested gave similar torque
>at around 300 RPM as at 1 or 2 RPM (this is as FAST as we tested with a 200
>step motor).
>
>
Oh, so 300 RPM is fast? I demoed a stepper system at the NAMES show in
2002,
I think, using the Gecko 201A drive (a chopper or PWM design) where the
motor was shoving the table of a 150-Lb mini-mill around at 90 IPM. At
that speed, the motor was spinning at 1440 RPM! I would guess the
motor was delivering close to 50% of rated torque at 1440 RPM.
I was quite impressed by this performance, and I doubt anybody's
drives can do much better. I probably could have gotten even better
performance out of the same motors with with a higher power supply voltage,
but there was no need. These were not the latest high performance motors,
either, but some 30 year old ones salvaged from printers.

Jon

Discussion Thread

Jarrett & Heidi Johnson 2005-10-24 06:55:16 UTC Re: PWM vs Constant current Alan Rothenbush 2005-10-24 11:08:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current Jarrett & Heidi Johnson 2005-10-24 11:55:58 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current Alan Rothenbush 2005-10-24 16:22:38 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current Paul Kelly 2005-10-24 16:51:49 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current Jarrett & Heidi Johnson 2005-10-24 17:45:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current Jon Elson 2005-10-24 18:46:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current turbulatordude 2005-10-24 19:32:24 UTC Re: PWM vs Constant current turbulatordude 2005-10-24 19:43:31 UTC Re: PWM vs Constant current R Rogers 2005-10-24 21:46:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex Jarrett & Heidi Johnson 2005-10-24 22:12:05 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex Jon Elson 2005-10-24 22:38:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current R Rogers 2005-10-25 05:52:02 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex turbulatordude 2005-10-25 06:24:24 UTC Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex R Rogers 2005-10-25 07:07:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex Fred Smith 2005-10-25 10:08:26 UTC Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex Mariss Freimanis 2005-10-25 13:11:28 UTC Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex Brian 2005-10-25 14:11:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex Roy J. Tellason 2005-10-25 18:08:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex Mariss Freimanis 2005-10-25 19:02:08 UTC Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex Tony Smith 2005-10-25 19:12:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex Mariss Freimanis 2005-10-25 19:28:54 UTC Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex Les Newell 2005-10-26 01:17:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex caedave 2005-10-26 02:14:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex Simon Arthur 2005-10-26 16:14:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex KM6VV 2005-10-26 17:29:07 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex Graham Stabler 2005-10-26 17:41:49 UTC Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex