Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
    Posted by
    
      Les Newell
    
  
  
    on 2005-10-26 01:17:08 UTC
  
  Just because the universe is limited to 3D, it doesn't mean that Mariss 
is ;-)
Really he means 6 axis. It is quite common for a machine to use more
than 3 axes. For instance a 5 axis machine could have the 3 standard
axes plus the ability to tilt the head in two axes as well.
Les
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.361 / Virus Database: 267.12.5/149 - Release Date: 25/10/2005
is ;-)
Really he means 6 axis. It is quite common for a machine to use more
than 3 axes. For instance a 5 axis machine could have the 3 standard
axes plus the ability to tilt the head in two axes as well.
Les
>--
> What the heck is 6D? Or anything beyond 3, for that matter?
>
>
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.361 / Virus Database: 267.12.5/149 - Release Date: 25/10/2005
Discussion Thread
  
    Jarrett & Heidi Johnson
  
2005-10-24 06:55:16 UTC
  Re: PWM vs Constant current
  
    Alan Rothenbush
  
2005-10-24 11:08:53 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
  
    Jarrett & Heidi Johnson
  
2005-10-24 11:55:58 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
  
    Alan Rothenbush
  
2005-10-24 16:22:38 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
  
    Paul Kelly
  
2005-10-24 16:51:49 UTC
  RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
  
    Jarrett & Heidi Johnson
  
2005-10-24 17:45:33 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
  
    Jon Elson
  
2005-10-24 18:46:43 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
  
    turbulatordude
  
2005-10-24 19:32:24 UTC
  Re: PWM vs Constant current
  
    turbulatordude
  
2005-10-24 19:43:31 UTC
  Re: PWM vs Constant current
  
    R Rogers
  
2005-10-24 21:46:00 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    Jarrett & Heidi Johnson
  
2005-10-24 22:12:05 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    Jon Elson
  
2005-10-24 22:38:39 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
  
    R Rogers
  
2005-10-25 05:52:02 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    turbulatordude
  
2005-10-25 06:24:24 UTC
  Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    R Rogers
  
2005-10-25 07:07:45 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    Fred Smith
  
2005-10-25 10:08:26 UTC
  Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    Mariss Freimanis
  
2005-10-25 13:11:28 UTC
  Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    Brian
  
2005-10-25 14:11:41 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    Roy J. Tellason
  
2005-10-25 18:08:06 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    Mariss Freimanis
  
2005-10-25 19:02:08 UTC
  Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    Tony Smith
  
2005-10-25 19:12:37 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    Mariss Freimanis
  
2005-10-25 19:28:54 UTC
  Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    Les Newell
  
2005-10-26 01:17:08 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    caedave
  
2005-10-26 02:14:47 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    Simon Arthur
  
2005-10-26 16:14:52 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    KM6VV
  
2005-10-26 17:29:07 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    Graham Stabler
  
2005-10-26 17:41:49 UTC
  Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex