CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex

Posted by Fred Smith
on 2005-10-25 10:08:26 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, R Rogers <rogersmach@y...>
wrote:
>
> //// With Mach3, The pulse rate frequency can be set as high as
45k/sec. This is ample for any system unless someone is wanting to
use some ridiculous amount of encoder count resolution that no mill
or router table could take advantage of. ///
>
>

Our Sherline servo systems run 85,000 steps per second with DeskCNC.

That is the top end of our Globe servo motors w/ 500 line encoders
(2800 rpm). That equates to 45 ipm on a 20 pitch screw.

Our small router will initially be the same step rate with a 90 ipm
top end. Same motor.

If we went with a 4000 rpm motor, the step rate would be just over
120,000 steps per second. DeskCNC will still handle that rate as it
can go to about 125,000 sps.

Proven serial port/windows technology, the current generation has
now been in the field for over a year.

Fred Smith - IMService
http://www.cadcamcadcam.com/hobby

Discussion Thread

Jarrett & Heidi Johnson 2005-10-24 06:55:16 UTC Re: PWM vs Constant current Alan Rothenbush 2005-10-24 11:08:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current Jarrett & Heidi Johnson 2005-10-24 11:55:58 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current Alan Rothenbush 2005-10-24 16:22:38 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current Paul Kelly 2005-10-24 16:51:49 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current Jarrett & Heidi Johnson 2005-10-24 17:45:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current Jon Elson 2005-10-24 18:46:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current turbulatordude 2005-10-24 19:32:24 UTC Re: PWM vs Constant current turbulatordude 2005-10-24 19:43:31 UTC Re: PWM vs Constant current R Rogers 2005-10-24 21:46:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex Jarrett & Heidi Johnson 2005-10-24 22:12:05 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex Jon Elson 2005-10-24 22:38:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current R Rogers 2005-10-25 05:52:02 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex turbulatordude 2005-10-25 06:24:24 UTC Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex R Rogers 2005-10-25 07:07:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex Fred Smith 2005-10-25 10:08:26 UTC Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex Mariss Freimanis 2005-10-25 13:11:28 UTC Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex Brian 2005-10-25 14:11:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex Roy J. Tellason 2005-10-25 18:08:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex Mariss Freimanis 2005-10-25 19:02:08 UTC Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex Tony Smith 2005-10-25 19:12:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex Mariss Freimanis 2005-10-25 19:28:54 UTC Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex Les Newell 2005-10-26 01:17:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex caedave 2005-10-26 02:14:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex Simon Arthur 2005-10-26 16:14:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex KM6VV 2005-10-26 17:29:07 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex Graham Stabler 2005-10-26 17:41:49 UTC Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex