Re: PWM vs Constant current
Posted by
turbulatordude
on 2005-10-24 19:32:24 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Jarrett & Heidi Johnson
<hjjohnson@s...> wrote:
the Gecko REX is not a driver, it is an interface board.
Check the specs on your breakout board, it will be 3 or 4 motor
outputs, the REX can do 6.
Also the unit accepts quadrature inputs so it connects the encoders to
the board.
In addition, a parallel port can only to 8 outs for 4 motors (one step
and one dir each) and another 4 outputs and then 5 inputs.
the REX can do 6 motors and 16 additional outputs and 22 addition inputs.
In addition it has 4 analogue ins and 4 analogue outs
and connects via USB or eithernet.
So, what that would make that card out to be is the interface for a
very high end platform. Everything is already in there so there are
no additional cards to be for another motor or more I/O's.
At $208 it is only about $50 more than a high end parallel port card.
I would expect to see those parallel port cards on e-bay soon as the
guys who spend the $$ want the best.
All I see that is missing is a 7th encoder input. one for the pendant
jog unit. but, I would bet that can be handled quite simply.
Dave
<hjjohnson@s...> wrote:
>someone
> Alan, thanks for taking the time. Don't worry, I'm not offended by
> waving a BS flag , I'd rather learn this now vs, later after I'vespent the
> $$.system
>
> I had settled on a cnc4pc break out board and a charge pump run through
> Gecko 202's and a 34 size motors but this kind of side-tracked me. I'm
> looking to build the simplest [ as far as figuring out electronics]
> by purchaseing all the pre-made boards and what not that I can off thethat was
> shelf. Yet I didn't want to buy a complete off the shelf system as
> to big of a jump in price.. somewhere in between was the plan.I've been
> reading cnc sites and posts for 2 weeks straight [ at least 5 hrsper night
> as well as weekends and coffee breaks @ work ] so.. I'm getting agrasp but
> still missing some key points which will hopefully be filled in overtime.
> I'm wondering about the Rex board by Gecko, what does that do vs, agreat w/
> break-out board? Any recommendations for breakout boards that work
> Mach 3? I've got many more questions but I'll leave those for laterfor
> now I'm off the the yahoo file section for more reading!Hi Jarrett,
>
> Thanks
> Jarrett Johnson
the Gecko REX is not a driver, it is an interface board.
Check the specs on your breakout board, it will be 3 or 4 motor
outputs, the REX can do 6.
Also the unit accepts quadrature inputs so it connects the encoders to
the board.
In addition, a parallel port can only to 8 outs for 4 motors (one step
and one dir each) and another 4 outputs and then 5 inputs.
the REX can do 6 motors and 16 additional outputs and 22 addition inputs.
In addition it has 4 analogue ins and 4 analogue outs
and connects via USB or eithernet.
So, what that would make that card out to be is the interface for a
very high end platform. Everything is already in there so there are
no additional cards to be for another motor or more I/O's.
At $208 it is only about $50 more than a high end parallel port card.
I would expect to see those parallel port cards on e-bay soon as the
guys who spend the $$ want the best.
All I see that is missing is a 7th encoder input. one for the pendant
jog unit. but, I would bet that can be handled quite simply.
Dave
Discussion Thread
Jarrett & Heidi Johnson
2005-10-24 06:55:16 UTC
Re: PWM vs Constant current
Alan Rothenbush
2005-10-24 11:08:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
Jarrett & Heidi Johnson
2005-10-24 11:55:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
Alan Rothenbush
2005-10-24 16:22:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
Paul Kelly
2005-10-24 16:51:49 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
Jarrett & Heidi Johnson
2005-10-24 17:45:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
Jon Elson
2005-10-24 18:46:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
turbulatordude
2005-10-24 19:32:24 UTC
Re: PWM vs Constant current
turbulatordude
2005-10-24 19:43:31 UTC
Re: PWM vs Constant current
R Rogers
2005-10-24 21:46:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Jarrett & Heidi Johnson
2005-10-24 22:12:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Jon Elson
2005-10-24 22:38:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
R Rogers
2005-10-25 05:52:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
turbulatordude
2005-10-25 06:24:24 UTC
Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
R Rogers
2005-10-25 07:07:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Fred Smith
2005-10-25 10:08:26 UTC
Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Mariss Freimanis
2005-10-25 13:11:28 UTC
Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Brian
2005-10-25 14:11:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Roy J. Tellason
2005-10-25 18:08:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Mariss Freimanis
2005-10-25 19:02:08 UTC
Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Tony Smith
2005-10-25 19:12:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Mariss Freimanis
2005-10-25 19:28:54 UTC
Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Les Newell
2005-10-26 01:17:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
caedave
2005-10-26 02:14:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Simon Arthur
2005-10-26 16:14:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
KM6VV
2005-10-26 17:29:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Graham Stabler
2005-10-26 17:41:49 UTC
Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex