Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
    Posted by
    
      Mariss Freimanis
    
  
  
    on 2005-10-25 19:02:08 UTC
  
  2D and 3D can be visualized, anything above cannot or the 
explaination is unsatisfying. With that in mind, let me try anyway:
4D: This may be silly but say you want to carve your name into a game-
winning baseball with a knife. The XYZ axis maps your signature on a
sphere (the ball). You want the knife edge to always point in the
direction of the XYZ travel using a theta (rotational) 4th axis.
5D: You are using a Dremel-like tool to carve a 3D bust (head and
shoulders) sculpture of yourself. For things to work right with the
tool you need to always keep it vertical to the carving surface
plane. The XYZ axis puts the tool in the required 3D space. The 4th
and 5th axis operate the azimuth and elevation of the tool. You get a
nicely carved sculpture.
6D: For some reason you have built the Hexapod you have always
wanted. Takes 6 coordinated axis to run it though.:-)
Whether it's 2D or 6D, all this means is 2 or more axis start and
stop at the same time while maintaining the same ratios of speed
between each other, each moving different distances.
Mariss
P.S. The 5D carving thing sounds cool; I hadn't thought of that one
before.
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Roy J. Tellason"
<rtellason@b...> wrote:
explaination is unsatisfying. With that in mind, let me try anyway:
4D: This may be silly but say you want to carve your name into a game-
winning baseball with a knife. The XYZ axis maps your signature on a
sphere (the ball). You want the knife edge to always point in the
direction of the XYZ travel using a theta (rotational) 4th axis.
5D: You are using a Dremel-like tool to carve a 3D bust (head and
shoulders) sculpture of yourself. For things to work right with the
tool you need to always keep it vertical to the carving surface
plane. The XYZ axis puts the tool in the required 3D space. The 4th
and 5th axis operate the azimuth and elevation of the tool. You get a
nicely carved sculpture.
6D: For some reason you have built the Hexapod you have always
wanted. Takes 6 coordinated axis to run it though.:-)
Whether it's 2D or 6D, all this means is 2 or more axis start and
stop at the same time while maintaining the same ratios of speed
between each other, each moving different distances.
Mariss
P.S. The 5D carving thing sounds cool; I hadn't thought of that one
before.
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Roy J. Tellason"
<rtellason@b...> wrote:
>Masters"
> On Tuesday 25 October 2005 04:11 pm, Mariss Freimanis wrote:
> >
> > 2) Constant contouring 2D, 3D thru 6D.
>
> What the heck is 6D? Or anything beyond 3, for that matter?
>
> --
> Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and
> ablest -- form of life in this section of space, a critter that can
> be killed but can't be tamed. --Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet
>
Discussion Thread
  
    Jarrett & Heidi Johnson
  
2005-10-24 06:55:16 UTC
  Re: PWM vs Constant current
  
    Alan Rothenbush
  
2005-10-24 11:08:53 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
  
    Jarrett & Heidi Johnson
  
2005-10-24 11:55:58 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
  
    Alan Rothenbush
  
2005-10-24 16:22:38 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
  
    Paul Kelly
  
2005-10-24 16:51:49 UTC
  RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
  
    Jarrett & Heidi Johnson
  
2005-10-24 17:45:33 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
  
    Jon Elson
  
2005-10-24 18:46:43 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
  
    turbulatordude
  
2005-10-24 19:32:24 UTC
  Re: PWM vs Constant current
  
    turbulatordude
  
2005-10-24 19:43:31 UTC
  Re: PWM vs Constant current
  
    R Rogers
  
2005-10-24 21:46:00 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    Jarrett & Heidi Johnson
  
2005-10-24 22:12:05 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    Jon Elson
  
2005-10-24 22:38:39 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
  
    R Rogers
  
2005-10-25 05:52:02 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    turbulatordude
  
2005-10-25 06:24:24 UTC
  Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    R Rogers
  
2005-10-25 07:07:45 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    Fred Smith
  
2005-10-25 10:08:26 UTC
  Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    Mariss Freimanis
  
2005-10-25 13:11:28 UTC
  Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    Brian
  
2005-10-25 14:11:41 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    Roy J. Tellason
  
2005-10-25 18:08:06 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    Mariss Freimanis
  
2005-10-25 19:02:08 UTC
  Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    Tony Smith
  
2005-10-25 19:12:37 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    Mariss Freimanis
  
2005-10-25 19:28:54 UTC
  Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    Les Newell
  
2005-10-26 01:17:08 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    caedave
  
2005-10-26 02:14:47 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    Simon Arthur
  
2005-10-26 16:14:52 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    KM6VV
  
2005-10-26 17:29:07 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
  
    Graham Stabler
  
2005-10-26 17:41:49 UTC
  Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex