Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Posted by
Mariss Freimanis
on 2005-10-25 19:02:08 UTC
2D and 3D can be visualized, anything above cannot or the
explaination is unsatisfying. With that in mind, let me try anyway:
4D: This may be silly but say you want to carve your name into a game-
winning baseball with a knife. The XYZ axis maps your signature on a
sphere (the ball). You want the knife edge to always point in the
direction of the XYZ travel using a theta (rotational) 4th axis.
5D: You are using a Dremel-like tool to carve a 3D bust (head and
shoulders) sculpture of yourself. For things to work right with the
tool you need to always keep it vertical to the carving surface
plane. The XYZ axis puts the tool in the required 3D space. The 4th
and 5th axis operate the azimuth and elevation of the tool. You get a
nicely carved sculpture.
6D: For some reason you have built the Hexapod you have always
wanted. Takes 6 coordinated axis to run it though.:-)
Whether it's 2D or 6D, all this means is 2 or more axis start and
stop at the same time while maintaining the same ratios of speed
between each other, each moving different distances.
Mariss
P.S. The 5D carving thing sounds cool; I hadn't thought of that one
before.
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Roy J. Tellason"
<rtellason@b...> wrote:
explaination is unsatisfying. With that in mind, let me try anyway:
4D: This may be silly but say you want to carve your name into a game-
winning baseball with a knife. The XYZ axis maps your signature on a
sphere (the ball). You want the knife edge to always point in the
direction of the XYZ travel using a theta (rotational) 4th axis.
5D: You are using a Dremel-like tool to carve a 3D bust (head and
shoulders) sculpture of yourself. For things to work right with the
tool you need to always keep it vertical to the carving surface
plane. The XYZ axis puts the tool in the required 3D space. The 4th
and 5th axis operate the azimuth and elevation of the tool. You get a
nicely carved sculpture.
6D: For some reason you have built the Hexapod you have always
wanted. Takes 6 coordinated axis to run it though.:-)
Whether it's 2D or 6D, all this means is 2 or more axis start and
stop at the same time while maintaining the same ratios of speed
between each other, each moving different distances.
Mariss
P.S. The 5D carving thing sounds cool; I hadn't thought of that one
before.
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Roy J. Tellason"
<rtellason@b...> wrote:
>Masters"
> On Tuesday 25 October 2005 04:11 pm, Mariss Freimanis wrote:
> >
> > 2) Constant contouring 2D, 3D thru 6D.
>
> What the heck is 6D? Or anything beyond 3, for that matter?
>
> --
> Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and
> ablest -- form of life in this section of space, a critter that can
> be killed but can't be tamed. --Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet
>
Discussion Thread
Jarrett & Heidi Johnson
2005-10-24 06:55:16 UTC
Re: PWM vs Constant current
Alan Rothenbush
2005-10-24 11:08:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
Jarrett & Heidi Johnson
2005-10-24 11:55:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
Alan Rothenbush
2005-10-24 16:22:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
Paul Kelly
2005-10-24 16:51:49 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
Jarrett & Heidi Johnson
2005-10-24 17:45:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
Jon Elson
2005-10-24 18:46:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
turbulatordude
2005-10-24 19:32:24 UTC
Re: PWM vs Constant current
turbulatordude
2005-10-24 19:43:31 UTC
Re: PWM vs Constant current
R Rogers
2005-10-24 21:46:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Jarrett & Heidi Johnson
2005-10-24 22:12:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Jon Elson
2005-10-24 22:38:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
R Rogers
2005-10-25 05:52:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
turbulatordude
2005-10-25 06:24:24 UTC
Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
R Rogers
2005-10-25 07:07:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Fred Smith
2005-10-25 10:08:26 UTC
Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Mariss Freimanis
2005-10-25 13:11:28 UTC
Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Brian
2005-10-25 14:11:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Roy J. Tellason
2005-10-25 18:08:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Mariss Freimanis
2005-10-25 19:02:08 UTC
Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Tony Smith
2005-10-25 19:12:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Mariss Freimanis
2005-10-25 19:28:54 UTC
Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Les Newell
2005-10-26 01:17:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
caedave
2005-10-26 02:14:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Simon Arthur
2005-10-26 16:14:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
KM6VV
2005-10-26 17:29:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Graham Stabler
2005-10-26 17:41:49 UTC
Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex