Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2005-10-24 22:38:39 UTC
turbulatordude wrote:
It could do up to 300,000 step/sec, per axis. For the 1440 RPM with the
Gecko 201A, that is 24 revs/sec, 4800 full steps/sec, or 48,000
microsteps/sec.
And this is with a real load on a size 34 motor.
steps/sec
with my USC and Gecko 320 drives. No practical stepper motor is going to
run that fast. (200,000 steps/sec on a x10 microstepping driver is 100
revs/sec
or 6000 RPM on a 200 step/rev motor. I wouldn't want to stand too close
to that!
Jon
>you could match motors and power supplies and drive the driver with aWell, I was doing this in 2001 with my first Universal Stepper Controller.
>very uniform pulse stream. Do I remember correctly when the whole
>G200x came out that he ran at 200,000 hz ? on a 10 microstep driver
>that is 20,000 full steps per second. divide that by 200 steps per rev
>to get 1,000 steps a second, and multiply that times 60 ?
>
>
It could do up to 300,000 step/sec, per axis. For the 1440 RPM with the
Gecko 201A, that is 24 revs/sec, 4800 full steps/sec, or 48,000
microsteps/sec.
And this is with a real load on a size 34 motor.
>I remember 200,000 hz, but am not sure if it was into a stepper or aMost likely a servo. I have a router customer who is running 300,000
>servo.
>
>
steps/sec
with my USC and Gecko 320 drives. No practical stepper motor is going to
run that fast. (200,000 steps/sec on a x10 microstepping driver is 100
revs/sec
or 6000 RPM on a 200 step/rev motor. I wouldn't want to stand too close
to that!
Jon
Discussion Thread
Jarrett & Heidi Johnson
2005-10-24 06:55:16 UTC
Re: PWM vs Constant current
Alan Rothenbush
2005-10-24 11:08:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
Jarrett & Heidi Johnson
2005-10-24 11:55:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
Alan Rothenbush
2005-10-24 16:22:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
Paul Kelly
2005-10-24 16:51:49 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
Jarrett & Heidi Johnson
2005-10-24 17:45:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
Jon Elson
2005-10-24 18:46:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
turbulatordude
2005-10-24 19:32:24 UTC
Re: PWM vs Constant current
turbulatordude
2005-10-24 19:43:31 UTC
Re: PWM vs Constant current
R Rogers
2005-10-24 21:46:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Jarrett & Heidi Johnson
2005-10-24 22:12:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Jon Elson
2005-10-24 22:38:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current
R Rogers
2005-10-25 05:52:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
turbulatordude
2005-10-25 06:24:24 UTC
Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
R Rogers
2005-10-25 07:07:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Fred Smith
2005-10-25 10:08:26 UTC
Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Mariss Freimanis
2005-10-25 13:11:28 UTC
Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Brian
2005-10-25 14:11:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Roy J. Tellason
2005-10-25 18:08:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Mariss Freimanis
2005-10-25 19:02:08 UTC
Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Tony Smith
2005-10-25 19:12:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Mariss Freimanis
2005-10-25 19:28:54 UTC
Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Les Newell
2005-10-26 01:17:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
caedave
2005-10-26 02:14:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Simon Arthur
2005-10-26 16:14:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
KM6VV
2005-10-26 17:29:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex
Graham Stabler
2005-10-26 17:41:49 UTC
Re: PWM vs Constant current and G-rex