Re: Encoder question - Rutex concerns
Posted by
bob_kellock
on 2006-03-11 09:47:45 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Carl Mikkelsen <c.mikkelsen@.
..> wrote:
but without success.
Their documentation states "SPI communication is little known to
average PC users" and, I suspect that also applies to Rutex if they
are talking about SPI as originally standardised by Motorola. At the
very least, you could not hook up multiple drives to a micro with a
Motorola compatible SPI without additional interfacing as the drives
do not have a connection for acting as /SlaveSelect.
Bob
..> wrote:
>I've also been trying to get information about their "SPI" interface
> I would be careful with Rutex. Be certain that you have ALL
> specifications you need before you purchase.
>
> I bought seven of their DC-brush servo drives, and have not been
> able to implement an SPI connection. Several attempts to contact
> Rutex have been answered with assurances that I would get
> information, followed by delays and silence. At one point, they
> claimed to be too busy to send me the timing specification for their
> SPI implementation.
>
> I choose Rutex over Gecko because of the SPI interface. Knowing the
> lack of support or even documentation available, I would not buy
> Rutex again.
>
> Needless to say, I am not happy.
>
> -- Carl
>
but without success.
Their documentation states "SPI communication is little known to
average PC users" and, I suspect that also applies to Rutex if they
are talking about SPI as originally standardised by Motorola. At the
very least, you could not hook up multiple drives to a micro with a
Motorola compatible SPI without additional interfacing as the drives
do not have a connection for acting as /SlaveSelect.
Bob
Discussion Thread
Robert
2000-06-13 16:10:41 UTC
Encoder question
F. de Beer
2001-07-21 11:33:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoder question
Jon Elson
2001-07-21 15:47:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoder question
Scott M. Thomas
2001-07-23 09:56:48 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoder question
babinda01
2005-04-04 04:16:38 UTC
Encoder question
Jon Elson
2005-04-04 09:49:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoder question
Roy J. Tellason
2005-04-04 10:49:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoder question
Jon Elson
2005-04-04 22:47:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoder question
cnc002@a...
2005-04-05 07:39:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoder question
Mcginnis, Darrell S
2005-05-17 16:00:56 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoder question
BRIAN FOLEY
2006-03-08 14:40:37 UTC
Encoder question
Dan Mauch
2006-03-08 17:40:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoder question
BRIAN FOLEY
2006-03-08 22:00:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoder question
Peter Homann
2006-03-08 22:06:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoder question
BRIAN FOLEY
2006-03-08 23:42:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoder question
Carl Mikkelsen
2006-03-10 14:12:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoder question - Rutex concerns
Jon Elson
2006-03-10 18:21:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoder question - Rutex concerns
John Dammeyer
2006-03-10 19:40:43 UTC
MPG behaviour
craig strudwicke
2006-03-10 21:06:52 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] MPG behaviour
Steve Blackmore
2006-03-11 00:44:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] MPG behaviour
Andy Wander
2006-03-11 04:08:50 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] MPG behaviour
Alan Marconett
2006-03-11 09:06:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] MPG behaviour
bob_kellock
2006-03-11 09:47:45 UTC
Re: Encoder question - Rutex concerns
Peter Homann
2006-03-11 14:31:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] MPG behaviour
skykotech
2006-03-14 10:54:55 UTC
Re: Encoder question
BRIAN FOLEY
2006-03-14 13:45:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoder question
Les Newell
2006-03-14 14:05:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoder question
BRIAN FOLEY
2006-03-14 14:46:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoder question
skykotech
2006-03-14 16:09:20 UTC
Re: Encoder question
BRIAN FOLEY
2006-03-14 16:12:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoder question