Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RF-45 Retrofit
Posted by
Mike Gann
on 2000-08-18 21:04:47 UTC
Thanks Peter. That is true. I guess it is just sticker shock.
I am new to machining, but have a good computer/electronic background.
This is a perfect match for me as hobbies go. I was just a little
shocked
as far as the Ballscrew prices go.
Thanks
Mike Gann
ptengin@... wrote:
I am new to machining, but have a good computer/electronic background.
This is a perfect match for me as hobbies go. I was just a little
shocked
as far as the Ballscrew prices go.
Thanks
Mike Gann
ptengin@... wrote:
>
> In a message dated 08/18/2000 5:46:48 PM Hawaiian Standard Time,
> mikegann@... writes:
>
> << It would cost almost as much for the Ball screws and nuts as I paid for
> the whole machine.
>
> Am I missing something? If this was a Bridgeport retrofit I might not
> hesitate as much. But this is a pretty old machine. I don't want to
> guess
> how old the base is. >>
>
> Mike,
>
> When you really think about it, the ballscrew is a cnc machine's heart in
> terms of accuracy or inaccuracy. Whether the iron is old or new, the required
> tolerances of the parts you want to produce will dictate dollars you spend on
> the screws. Old iron, unless seriously out of square and or the ways are
> shot, will make parts just as nice as newer iron as long as your CNC system
> is set up correctly.
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
>
> Addresses:
> Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@egroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@egroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://www.egroups.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> bill,
> List Manager
Discussion Thread
ptengin@a...
2000-08-18 19:06:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RF-45 Retrofit
Mike Gann
2000-08-18 20:42:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RF-45 Retrofit
ptengin@a...
2000-08-18 20:55:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RF-45 Retrofit
Mike Gann
2000-08-18 21:04:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RF-45 Retrofit
Ian Wright
2000-08-19 01:19:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RF-45 Retrofit
Terry May
2000-08-19 08:06:11 UTC
Re: RF-45 Retrofit
Terry May
2000-08-19 08:17:51 UTC
Re: RF-45 Retrofit
Tim Goldstein
2000-08-19 11:28:39 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RF-45 Retrofit
Terry May
2000-08-19 11:37:25 UTC
Re: RF-45 Retrofit
ptengin@a...
2000-08-19 15:56:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RF-45 Retrofit
ptengin@a...
2000-08-23 17:24:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RF-45 Retrofit
Terry May
2000-08-24 16:24:20 UTC
Re: RF-45 Retrofit
ptengin@a...
2000-08-25 03:07:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RF-45 Retrofit
ptengin@a...
2000-08-25 03:21:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RF-45 Retrofit
Area51tats@a...
2000-08-25 04:36:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RF-45 Retrofit
Terry May
2000-08-25 15:33:13 UTC
Re: RF-45 Retrofit
Carlos Guillermo
2000-08-25 18:13:13 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RF-45 Retrofit
ptengin@a...
2000-08-26 02:53:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RF-45 Retrofit
ptengin@a...
2000-08-26 03:31:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RF-45 Retrofit
Terry May
2000-08-26 15:18:22 UTC
Re: RF-45 Retrofit
dave engvall
2000-08-26 19:31:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RF-45 Retrofit
Tim Goldstein
2000-08-26 21:12:56 UTC
Treadmill motors and interference
Ejay Hire
2000-08-27 09:02:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RF-45 Retrofit