Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Posted by
Ian W. Wright
on 1999-08-04 14:02:15 UTC
Thanks Pete,
As mine is such a small machine, I was considering a simpler method of
backlash adjustment. The feedscrews are only basically normal threads
(not ballscrews) and are 1mm pitch. The nuts are made of bronze and are
cut across for 3/4 their width part way down the thread and a screw is
installed to nip the two parts together - the same effect as having two
nuts sprung apart on the thread. This way I can have a relatively long
nut to equalise any minor irregularities in the screw pitch whilst
keeping the main part of the nut always pressed up against one side of
the thread by just the right amount. This is a more effective method
than having two half nuts clasped around a thread.
Regarding the Tensator spring thing, I'm not sure it is the same
Tensator I know. The one I know from clocks - and which I thought was
the only one, needs two cylinders to wrap around. It is made in the same
fashion as a pocket tape measure spring, dished along its length and has
a natural tendency to straighten itself out. In clocks, it is this
force, rather than the more normal tensioning of a spiral spring which
is used to provide the drive. The spring you seem to describe is more
like a normal coiled spring and would follow Hookes Law 'Ut tensio, sic
vis' giving a non-linear force.
Ian
Pete Jarman wrote:
Ian
--
Ian W. Wright LBHI
Sheffield Branch Chairman of the British Horological Institute.
Bandmaster and Euphonium player of the Hathersage Brass Band. UK.
See our homepage at:- http://www.iw63.freeserve.co.uk or
http://www.iw63.demon.co.uk/ or
http://www.GeoCities.com/Hollywood/6067/index.html
'Music is the filling of regular time intervals with harmonious
oscillations.'
As mine is such a small machine, I was considering a simpler method of
backlash adjustment. The feedscrews are only basically normal threads
(not ballscrews) and are 1mm pitch. The nuts are made of bronze and are
cut across for 3/4 their width part way down the thread and a screw is
installed to nip the two parts together - the same effect as having two
nuts sprung apart on the thread. This way I can have a relatively long
nut to equalise any minor irregularities in the screw pitch whilst
keeping the main part of the nut always pressed up against one side of
the thread by just the right amount. This is a more effective method
than having two half nuts clasped around a thread.
Regarding the Tensator spring thing, I'm not sure it is the same
Tensator I know. The one I know from clocks - and which I thought was
the only one, needs two cylinders to wrap around. It is made in the same
fashion as a pocket tape measure spring, dished along its length and has
a natural tendency to straighten itself out. In clocks, it is this
force, rather than the more normal tensioning of a spiral spring which
is used to provide the drive. The spring you seem to describe is more
like a normal coiled spring and would follow Hookes Law 'Ut tensio, sic
vis' giving a non-linear force.
Ian
Pete Jarman wrote:
> The way Turner used a "Tensator" spring was to fix the outer end of theBest wishes
> spring to the quill and the spindle fixed to the centre of the coil to the
> underside of the quill housing with a suitable bracket which allowed the
> spindle to be rotated and locked to set the preload. As the quill is lowered
> the spring is wound up. If you used this with a feedscrew it would give you
> the necessary preload of the nut against the thread to eliminate the
> backlash. I'm considering using this idea to eliminate the backlash in a
> Stent cutter grinder I'm finishing off at the moment.
Ian
--
Ian W. Wright LBHI
Sheffield Branch Chairman of the British Horological Institute.
Bandmaster and Euphonium player of the Hathersage Brass Band. UK.
See our homepage at:- http://www.iw63.freeserve.co.uk or
http://www.iw63.demon.co.uk/ or
http://www.GeoCities.com/Hollywood/6067/index.html
'Music is the filling of regular time intervals with harmonious
oscillations.'
Discussion Thread
David M. Munro
1999-07-26 20:36:04 UTC
Engraving and engine turning
Dan Falck
1999-07-26 20:39:21 UTC
Re: Engraving and engine turning
David M. Munro
1999-07-27 05:29:00 UTC
Re: Engraving and engine turning
Ron Ginger
1999-07-27 14:09:32 UTC
Re: Engraving and engine turning
TADGUNINC@a...
1999-07-27 16:29:15 UTC
Re: Engraving and engine turning
David M. Munro
1999-07-27 17:11:14 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
David M. Munro
1999-07-27 20:24:50 UTC
Re: Engraving and engine turning
Bertho Boman
1999-07-28 03:42:21 UTC
Re: Engraving and engine turning
psp@x...
1999-07-28 04:50:53 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Tim Goldstein
1999-07-28 15:17:03 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Dan Mauch
1999-07-28 20:21:45 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
David M. Munro
1999-07-29 05:52:00 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Dan Mauch
1999-07-29 06:54:29 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
David M. Munro
1999-07-29 20:23:14 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Tim Goldstein
1999-07-29 20:47:33 UTC
RE: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Jeff Demand
1999-07-29 21:02:04 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Dan Mauch
1999-07-30 06:57:43 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Larry Van Duyn
1999-07-30 07:50:59 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
David M. Munro
1999-07-30 12:37:09 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Jon Elson
1999-07-30 22:29:41 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Ian W. Wright
1999-07-30 13:19:26 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
PTENGIN@x...
1999-07-31 02:53:40 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Peter Smith
1999-07-31 06:09:12 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Larry Van Duyn
1999-07-31 07:26:43 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
WBHINKLE@x...
1999-07-31 07:25:46 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Bertho Boman
1999-07-31 11:14:07 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Peter Smith
1999-07-31 12:24:19 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
PTENGIN@x...
1999-07-31 12:44:09 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Bertho Boman
1999-07-31 12:40:41 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Brian Fairey
1999-07-31 15:33:41 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Peter Smith
1999-08-01 11:12:09 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Pete Jarman
1999-08-03 03:00:48 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Ian W. Wright
1999-08-03 12:05:32 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Pete Jarman
1999-08-03 14:21:36 UTC
RE: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Bertho Boman
1999-08-03 15:38:48 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Bertho Boman
1999-08-03 15:56:54 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
David M. Munro
1999-08-03 17:39:13 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Ian W. Wright
1999-08-04 14:02:15 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Ian W. Wright
1999-08-04 13:43:09 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Ian W. Wright
1999-08-04 14:06:32 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Bertho Boman
1999-08-04 15:24:06 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Bertho Boman
1999-08-04 15:40:39 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
David M. Munro
1999-08-05 06:18:43 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
PTENGIN@x...
1999-08-05 10:45:05 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Steve Carlisle
1999-08-05 16:35:03 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Dan Mauch
1999-08-06 06:46:24 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning
Pete Jarman
1999-08-02 08:20:20 UTC
Re: Re: Engraving and engine turning