Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC problem/question
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2001-08-05 20:59:20 UTC
currinh@... wrote:
comment. Well, that means all the PID servo calculations are performed,
and loop stability is an issue. If the P (proportional gain) is too high,
unstable
performance will be seen. that is what I think is happening there. Turn P
down to around 100 and try some motion. If that works OK, turn it up
in small increments (you'll get a bit snappier performance) until either
the steppers lose steps or the motors start to sound rough, then go back
down some safe interval. You may have to set a larger following error
limit as lower P causes more lag.
Jon
>Oh, of course! Freqmod.o simulates a servo, as I mentioned in a previous
> I just tried this on a 450MHz PIII. At values of PERIOD between 16 and
> 40 us I could get motion but it didn't seem right. It wasn't as smooth
> as steppermod and would stop, buzz and lose steps at times. Some
> values of PERIOD seem better but I didn't get a feeling a value could be
> found to give "good" performance.
>
> I tried a value of 10 us which nearly locked the machine. Once the
> start-up hit "loading freqmod.o" it slowed to a snails pace. I closed
> that window but this didn't speed things up, it was like the real time
> process was still going. I was able to do a normal shutdown but even
> this was very slow, all the way to power down.
comment. Well, that means all the PID servo calculations are performed,
and loop stability is an issue. If the P (proportional gain) is too high,
unstable
performance will be seen. that is what I think is happening there. Turn P
down to around 100 and try some motion. If that works OK, turn it up
in small increments (you'll get a bit snappier performance) until either
the steppers lose steps or the motors start to sound rough, then go back
down some safe interval. You may have to set a larger following error
limit as lower P causes more lag.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Randy Poon
2001-08-03 08:59:32 UTC
[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RTV Mold
Smoke
2001-08-03 09:44:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RTV Mold
Alan King
2001-08-03 09:48:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RTV Mold
info.host@b...
2001-08-03 10:11:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RTV Mold
Scott A. Stephens
2001-08-03 10:27:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RTV Mold
oliver_lang1@y...
2001-08-03 10:43:29 UTC
Re: RTV Mold
JanRwl@A...
2001-08-03 12:42:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RTV Mold
John and Cindy Carey
2001-08-03 15:42:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RTV Mold
Hugh & Denise Currin
2001-08-04 13:25:43 UTC
EMC problem/question
Tim Goldstein
2001-08-04 13:44:18 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC problem/question
Hugh & Denise Currin
2001-08-04 16:05:28 UTC
Re: EMC problem/question
Jon Elson
2001-08-04 20:57:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC problem/question
Ian Wright
2001-08-05 04:05:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC problem/question
currinh@O...
2001-08-05 12:42:27 UTC
Re: EMC problem/question
currinh@O...
2001-08-05 13:00:17 UTC
Re: EMC problem/question
Jon Elson
2001-08-05 15:19:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC problem/question
Paul
2001-08-05 16:49:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC problem/question
currinh@O...
2001-08-05 17:35:04 UTC
Re: EMC problem/question
Jon Elson
2001-08-05 20:59:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC problem/question
currinh@O...
2001-08-06 19:03:40 UTC
Re: EMC problem/question
Jon Elson
2001-08-06 20:52:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC problem/question