Re: EMC problem/question
Posted by
currinh@O...
on 2001-08-06 19:03:40 UTC
Jon:
I got a chance to try "freqmod" as you suggest. After some futzing I
was able to get good motion from both X & Y. The P parameter was the
original problem. I went down to 100 and then started back up getting
to around 500 with good motion. I did set a dwell of .0005" which
stopped the dithering. I think I'm getting faster motion from freqmod
than steppermod but as yet have no numbers. I didn't put the
opto-isolation back in to see if it works with freqmod though.
I need to find the time to optimize the setting and see which works
best. But great progress is being made here. Thank you for your help.
I got a chance to try "freqmod" as you suggest. After some futzing I
was able to get good motion from both X & Y. The P parameter was the
original problem. I went down to 100 and then started back up getting
to around 500 with good motion. I did set a dwell of .0005" which
stopped the dithering. I think I'm getting faster motion from freqmod
than steppermod but as yet have no numbers. I didn't put the
opto-isolation back in to see if it works with freqmod though.
I need to find the time to optimize the setting and see which works
best. But great progress is being made here. Thank you for your help.
On 6 Aug, Jon Elson wrote:
>>
>> I just tried this on a 450MHz PIII.
>
> Oh, of course! Freqmod.o simulates a servo, as I mentioned in a previous
> comment. Well, that means all the PID servo calculations are performed,
> and loop stability is an issue. If the P (proportional gain) is too high,
> unstable
> performance will be seen. that is what I think is happening there. Turn P
> down to around 100 and try some motion. If that works OK, turn it up
> in small increments (you'll get a bit snappier performance) until either
> the steppers lose steps or the motors start to sound rough, then go back
> down some safe interval. You may have to set a larger following error
> limit as lower P causes more lag.
--
Hugh Currin
Klamath Falls, OR
Discussion Thread
Randy Poon
2001-08-03 08:59:32 UTC
[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RTV Mold
Smoke
2001-08-03 09:44:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RTV Mold
Alan King
2001-08-03 09:48:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RTV Mold
info.host@b...
2001-08-03 10:11:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RTV Mold
Scott A. Stephens
2001-08-03 10:27:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RTV Mold
oliver_lang1@y...
2001-08-03 10:43:29 UTC
Re: RTV Mold
JanRwl@A...
2001-08-03 12:42:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RTV Mold
John and Cindy Carey
2001-08-03 15:42:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RTV Mold
Hugh & Denise Currin
2001-08-04 13:25:43 UTC
EMC problem/question
Tim Goldstein
2001-08-04 13:44:18 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC problem/question
Hugh & Denise Currin
2001-08-04 16:05:28 UTC
Re: EMC problem/question
Jon Elson
2001-08-04 20:57:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC problem/question
Ian Wright
2001-08-05 04:05:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC problem/question
currinh@O...
2001-08-05 12:42:27 UTC
Re: EMC problem/question
currinh@O...
2001-08-05 13:00:17 UTC
Re: EMC problem/question
Jon Elson
2001-08-05 15:19:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC problem/question
Paul
2001-08-05 16:49:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC problem/question
currinh@O...
2001-08-05 17:35:04 UTC
Re: EMC problem/question
Jon Elson
2001-08-05 20:59:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC problem/question
currinh@O...
2001-08-06 19:03:40 UTC
Re: EMC problem/question
Jon Elson
2001-08-06 20:52:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC problem/question