Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Apologies
Posted by
info.host@b...
on 2001-08-06 21:56:19 UTC
I'd want to get some money out of them. For a start, the more you take from
them the more they realise why they shouldn't be letting their 12 year olds
run around outside at night. The parents will know precisely what the kids
are doing, or atleast have a damned good idea. When a 12 year old is out at
12am he's not going to be fixing up the motorway and cleaning up spilt
trash. I refuse to believe anyone short of being mentally inhibited, such as
ADHD suffers, can not be disciplined into doing what they're told. When
shouting doesn't work, hit them, there's nothing cruel about that I don't
think.
Reason number two. If the things in your shop were insured at their current
value you are most likely not going to get the money back they burnt. Suing
them is the only way to make up for that loss. There are numerous grounds
for suing, endangerment of your family, mental scaring (fear of not being
able to leave your kids at home) etc. Reason number three is easy, revenge.
I won't pretend I'm a good enough person not to think about revenge if
someone torches my house with my kids in it and then hospitalises them.
I still believe you can not place the entire blame on 12 year olds. 12 year
olds don't drink, vote, own guns, have sex, drive cars, watch adult films,
get married or even buy fireworks legally. That means the whole are not
ready to give 12 year olds that level of responsibility, why? Because people
that age do not ever think of what they're doing having a result. They knew
lighting a house would be bad, they didn't know it was something someone had
worked years for and was proud of. What interests me is that right now I
can't vote or get married without my parents permission, however, I can load
2000lb bombs onto planes, service artillery pieces and if need be, be killed
for my country in a war.
John
them the more they realise why they shouldn't be letting their 12 year olds
run around outside at night. The parents will know precisely what the kids
are doing, or atleast have a damned good idea. When a 12 year old is out at
12am he's not going to be fixing up the motorway and cleaning up spilt
trash. I refuse to believe anyone short of being mentally inhibited, such as
ADHD suffers, can not be disciplined into doing what they're told. When
shouting doesn't work, hit them, there's nothing cruel about that I don't
think.
Reason number two. If the things in your shop were insured at their current
value you are most likely not going to get the money back they burnt. Suing
them is the only way to make up for that loss. There are numerous grounds
for suing, endangerment of your family, mental scaring (fear of not being
able to leave your kids at home) etc. Reason number three is easy, revenge.
I won't pretend I'm a good enough person not to think about revenge if
someone torches my house with my kids in it and then hospitalises them.
I still believe you can not place the entire blame on 12 year olds. 12 year
olds don't drink, vote, own guns, have sex, drive cars, watch adult films,
get married or even buy fireworks legally. That means the whole are not
ready to give 12 year olds that level of responsibility, why? Because people
that age do not ever think of what they're doing having a result. They knew
lighting a house would be bad, they didn't know it was something someone had
worked years for and was proud of. What interests me is that right now I
can't vote or get married without my parents permission, however, I can load
2000lb bombs onto planes, service artillery pieces and if need be, be killed
for my country in a war.
John
> Absolutely NOT! I want to be clear that what I suggested, and others haveamends,
> also said, had NOTHING to do with "Getting some money" but it is the ONLY
> way a private individual can get any measure of retribution, making
> getting any hint of regret, etc. out of people who do things like this.It has
> already been pretty clear that the police, etc. don't want anything to dowith
> it. The only legal recourse we are left is suing people when they, ortheir
> kids, do something that leaves us damaged.
> Jon
Discussion Thread
hllrsr@c...
2001-08-04 21:09:40 UTC
Apologies
Scott A. Stephens
2001-08-05 01:55:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Apologies
John Guenther
2001-08-05 03:40:57 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Apologies
Matthew King
2001-08-05 07:43:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Apologies
Fitch R. Williams
2001-08-05 07:46:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Apologies
Hugh Prescott
2001-08-05 09:10:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Apologies
info.host@b...
2001-08-05 11:28:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Apologies
Fitch R. Williams
2001-08-05 14:24:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Apologies
Jon Elson
2001-08-05 14:54:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Apologies
Gail & Bryan Harries
2001-08-05 15:44:13 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Apologies
MARKEHLE
2001-08-05 15:51:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Apologies
JanRwl@A...
2001-08-05 15:56:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Apologies
Eric Keller
2001-08-06 05:40:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Apologies
Larry Edington
2001-08-06 09:56:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Apologies
Ian Wright
2001-08-06 16:27:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Apologies
Jon Elson
2001-08-06 20:40:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Apologies
info.host@b...
2001-08-06 21:56:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Apologies
Hugh Prescott
2001-08-07 11:31:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Apologies
Ian Wright
2001-08-07 14:33:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Apologies