CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: new members here:) {long}

Posted by Ian Wright
on 2001-12-23 12:57:56 UTC
Ahh, I stand corrected. I just had it in the back of my mind that the rings
were not open but were fastened round in some way - I remember seeing the
technique demonstrated in the UK Royal Armouries workshops.

Ian
--
Ian W. Wright
Sheffield UK
www.iw63.freeserve.co.uk
----- Original Message -----
From: "turksfixit" <turksfixit@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: 23 December 2001 02:25
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: new members here:) {long}


> historical chainmail was cut with a chisle off of a mandrel. if the mailer
wanted mail that wouldn't come apart he would cut an overlap, and hammer the
ends of the rings til they were flat, and then rivit the ring.
>
> Cyril
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "Ian Wright" <Ian@i...> wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "ballendo" <ballendo@y...>
> >
> > P.S. Are you striving for historical accuracy? Have you looked to the
> > makers of the "chain-mail" type shark suits for divers?
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I suspect not as I'm fairly sure the originals had the ends of each ring
> > overlapped and forge welded together. This stopped the rings opening up
and
> > falling apart when they were poked with a sword point. The material was
also
> > somewhat smaller than 3/16" - 16 or 18 gauge wire. To get somewhere near
> > automating the manufacture I would be looking at making the rings one at
a
> > time - cut wire to length off a coil, wrap it round a mandrel and
resistance
> > weld the ends together. The cunning bit would be to make the second row
> > interlink with the first row and the third row interlink with the
previous
> > two before they are welded up. Then you are approaching real chainmail -
> > each link having 6 others passing through it - two to the top, two to
the
> > bottom, one to the left and one to the right - all welded up so they
won't
> > pull apart!
> >
> > Ian
> > --
> > Ian W. Wright
> > Sheffield UK
> > www.iw63.freeserve.co.uk
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>
> Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> bill,
> List Manager
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>

Discussion Thread

turksfixit 2001-12-21 02:00:50 UTC new members here:) {long} ballendo 2001-12-21 04:17:12 UTC Re: new members here:) {long} turksfixit 2001-12-21 06:15:26 UTC Re: new members here:) {long} Bill Vance 2001-12-21 07:04:46 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] new members here:) {long} Scott 2001-12-21 09:42:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: new members here:) {long} Smoke 2001-12-21 09:58:04 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: new members here:) {long} Smoke 2001-12-21 10:02:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] new members here:) {long} turksfixit 2001-12-21 12:28:59 UTC Re: new members here:) {long} turksfixit 2001-12-21 12:31:28 UTC Re: new members here:) {long} ballendo 2001-12-22 00:30:14 UTC wire edm Chain mail was Re: new members here:) {long} ballendo 2001-12-22 01:30:05 UTC Re: new members here:) {long} Sven Peter 2001-12-22 05:23:07 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] new members here:) {long} Sven Peter 2001-12-22 05:47:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: new members here:) {long} Ian Wright 2001-12-22 08:21:09 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: new members here:) {long} Ian Wright 2001-12-22 08:21:10 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] new members here:) {long} Marcus & Eva 2001-12-22 08:42:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] wire edm Chain mail was Re: new members here:) {long} turksfixit 2001-12-22 18:25:52 UTC Re: new members here:) {long} Ian Wright 2001-12-23 12:57:56 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: new members here:) {long} Scott 2001-12-27 06:41:46 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: new members here:) {long}