Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam

Chris,

Lotta good stuff in this post. I've snipped one small part tho'

LOTS of people/companies were doing contouring in Windows before
FLashcut! Those just weren't AIMED at the low cost user... or large
markets.

Sometimes there is a tendency to forget that a world often exists
beyond our current boundaries... And might have existed for some time.

Have to say that the rest of your post is pretty spot on, IMO.

Hope this helps

Ballendo

P.S. Is there a reason Master5 isn't being considered in this group?
EXCELLENT contouring, NO black box. Extensive(nist EMC) gcodes (and
other import filetypes). LOW price. Down side? Currently slow pulse
output, but soon to change with Master6 release.

--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Chris L <datac@l...> wrote:
<snip>
> There is also some satisfaction in recognizing that this is the
company who actually "DID" make a PC based Windows control With
Continuous Contouring when all the Nay-sayers said "It can not be
done" and that DOS was the ONLY way ! They obviously were a
bit "advanced" back then. <snip>