Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Posted by
aspaguy
on 2002-01-14 20:22:17 UTC
If you look close, desknc appears to use the chip set from rutex. I
had figured this out before my original post and rutex didn't seem to
have the software to run it, but now I see a download I hadn't
noticed before. I am a newby, but I pay close attention and ask a lot
of questions.
Thanks
Dale
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Alan Marconett KM6VV <KM6VV@a...>
wrote:
had figured this out before my original post and rutex didn't seem to
have the software to run it, but now I see a download I hadn't
noticed before. I am a newby, but I pay close attention and ask a lot
of questions.
Thanks
Dale
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Alan Marconett KM6VV <KM6VV@a...>
wrote:
> Hi Ron,And
>
> I had looked at INDEXER.LPT, Yes, to much for the hobby market!
> I'd LOVE to get into a FlashCut type "black box" as well.an
>
> You might try the Rutex "black box":
>
> http://rutex.com/
>
> Look for "RT900 Motion control IC STEPEX" Which is available as
> IC, and somewhere on his site there is also a small PCB (900-000).I
> think it's mislabeled as:buy
>
> http://www.rutex.f2s.com/servo1.htm
>
> But it's a stepper, NOT a servo. About $76 USD.
>
>
> What about using something like DeskNC's new "black box"? We could
> them, and then ALL use them!struggled along
>
> Alan KM6VV
>
>
> ron ginger wrote:
> >
> > Chris L wrote ....
> >
> > > I would like
> > >to know why everyone has tried to do the "windows" thing and
> > >getting it right. It had been an open door for somone just tooverlay an
> > >interface to Indexer, windows OR Dos.Why no-one ever made acomplete g-code
> > >windows interface for Indexer before I'll NEVER understand. Thenagain
> > >nothing stops anyone now !sell a
> >
> > Real simple answer- Indexer.LPT is about $350. If you tried to
> > package on top if it you would be much to expensive for the hobby$200.
> > market. Look at all the low end packages- they are mostly under
> > And the latest version has a damn dongle with it. I would neverdeal
> > with one of those.would
> >
> > As I have written before, I like the signal box approach, BUT I
> > not buy one with a closed interface. If Flashcut would open theirspec
> > Id have converted my interactive system to it two years ago. Itried to
> > use the SimpleStep serial board but had to much troubleprogramming it
> > from Visual BAsic.time
> >
> > I am anxious to try the Master5 interface to VB, just havent had
> > yet.
> >
> > ron ginger
Discussion Thread
aspaguy
2002-01-10 20:30:06 UTC
Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
William Scalione
2002-01-11 06:56:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Dan Mauch
2002-01-11 07:16:12 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Chris L
2002-01-11 18:43:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
ballendo
2002-01-12 04:27:34 UTC
Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Chris L
2002-01-12 14:41:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
aspaguy
2002-01-13 15:38:19 UTC
Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Edwin S. Katz
2002-01-13 16:09:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-01-13 17:24:16 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Art Fenerty
2002-01-13 19:38:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
aspaguy
2002-01-13 19:58:04 UTC
Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Chris L
2002-01-13 20:21:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Tim Goldstein
2002-01-13 20:37:32 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Getting started, was:Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Chris L
2002-01-13 21:14:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Chris L
2002-01-13 21:19:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Getting started, was:Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
brianjbland
2002-01-14 07:33:24 UTC
Re: Getting started, was:Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
ron ginger
2002-01-14 16:37:44 UTC
Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Chris L
2002-01-14 16:44:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Getting started, was:Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Chris L
2002-01-14 17:38:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-01-14 17:49:29 UTC
Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
aspaguy
2002-01-14 19:28:36 UTC
Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Tim Goldstein
2002-01-14 20:13:18 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
aspaguy
2002-01-14 20:22:17 UTC
Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Chris L
2002-01-14 21:23:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Getting started, was:Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam