Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Posted by
ron ginger
on 2002-01-14 16:37:44 UTC
Chris L wrote ....
package on top if it you would be much to expensive for the hobby
market. Look at all the low end packages- they are mostly under $200.
And the latest version has a damn dongle with it. I would never deal
with one of those.
As I have written before, I like the signal box approach, BUT I would
not buy one with a closed interface. If Flashcut would open their spec
Id have converted my interactive system to it two years ago. I tried to
use the SimpleStep serial board but had to much trouble programming it
from Visual BAsic.
I am anxious to try the Master5 interface to VB, just havent had time
yet.
ron ginger
> I would likeReal simple answer- Indexer.LPT is about $350. If you tried to sell a
>to know why everyone has tried to do the "windows" thing and struggled along
>getting it right. It had been an open door for somone just to overlay an
>interface to Indexer, windows OR Dos.Why no-one ever made a complete g-code
>windows interface for Indexer before I'll NEVER understand. Then again
>nothing stops anyone now !
package on top if it you would be much to expensive for the hobby
market. Look at all the low end packages- they are mostly under $200.
And the latest version has a damn dongle with it. I would never deal
with one of those.
As I have written before, I like the signal box approach, BUT I would
not buy one with a closed interface. If Flashcut would open their spec
Id have converted my interactive system to it two years ago. I tried to
use the SimpleStep serial board but had to much trouble programming it
from Visual BAsic.
I am anxious to try the Master5 interface to VB, just havent had time
yet.
ron ginger
Discussion Thread
aspaguy
2002-01-10 20:30:06 UTC
Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
William Scalione
2002-01-11 06:56:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Dan Mauch
2002-01-11 07:16:12 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Chris L
2002-01-11 18:43:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
ballendo
2002-01-12 04:27:34 UTC
Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Chris L
2002-01-12 14:41:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
aspaguy
2002-01-13 15:38:19 UTC
Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Edwin S. Katz
2002-01-13 16:09:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-01-13 17:24:16 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Art Fenerty
2002-01-13 19:38:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
aspaguy
2002-01-13 19:58:04 UTC
Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Chris L
2002-01-13 20:21:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Tim Goldstein
2002-01-13 20:37:32 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Getting started, was:Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Chris L
2002-01-13 21:14:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Chris L
2002-01-13 21:19:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Getting started, was:Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
brianjbland
2002-01-14 07:33:24 UTC
Re: Getting started, was:Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
ron ginger
2002-01-14 16:37:44 UTC
Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Chris L
2002-01-14 16:44:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Getting started, was:Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Chris L
2002-01-14 17:38:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-01-14 17:49:29 UTC
Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
aspaguy
2002-01-14 19:28:36 UTC
Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Tim Goldstein
2002-01-14 20:13:18 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
aspaguy
2002-01-14 20:22:17 UTC
Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam
Chris L
2002-01-14 21:23:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Getting started, was:Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam