CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam

Posted by Edwin S. Katz
on 2002-01-13 16:09:54 UTC
Dale:

As a fellow newbie, I know what you are going through. There are a lot of us
out here going through the same information. Unfortunately, the information
doesn't always come in order and it gets confusing (at least for me) There
seems to be many CAD or CAD/CAM programs for sale ranging from a few hundred
dollars to over ten thousand dollars. Which ones are just adequate and
which ones are superlative, and at what price?
I am interested not only in software but in knowing about stepper motors,
drivers, and the hardware as well. If I asked all the questions that come to
mind they would probably kick my ass of the chat group.
You posed some good questions and don't give up. Thanks Ed Katz

----- Original Message -----
From: "aspaguy" <spaguy@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 5:38 PM
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam


> ---
> Group: Thanks for the insightfull replies to my post. paricularly
> Chris, Dan & Ballendo. Like so many things in life answers just
> create more questions.I did resend the e-mail to flashcut and got a
> quick response. unfortunately, as a newby the benefits they described
> were over my head and I'm not sure that weather deskwin nc has the
> same benefits or not. I will e-mail deskam and ask them about these.
> It seems that no one here on the group has dealt with both progams
> much, but fortunately Dan and Chris have each used 1 of the programs
> and found them favorable. this information also creates more
> questions, like what is Continuous contouring? it sounds like its
> important for my type of application.And what about tool radius
> compensation. I would assume this has to do with cutting a square
> hole with a round bit and getting corners that are radiused the same
> as the bit radius, but i don't see how software can fix that.
> As far as why Master 5 wasn't being considered, well that has more
> to do with how i got to this point than with good sense. To make a
> long story short, I was under the impression that using the windows
> clock to run the program created very undesireable problems. I would
> appreciate more feedback on this and if master 5 has really been
> able to adequately solve it without a signal generator. I previously
> had stumbled on to the master 5 sight, but dismissed it becaus of no
> signal gen. At Ballendo's suggestion I went to the data base to check
> out Master 5 and discovered It was authored by a guy named Art, the
> same Art who seemed Quite insightful in answering many of the
> questions I have seen on this group. This tells me that this is
> definitly worth looking at along with the other 2 Also, I have seen
> a few programs with nesting features for better materials usage, but
> most of them have been expensive. does anyone know if this is
> available in any of these low cost programs? Would this be considered
> a cad or a cam funtion? Speaking of cam, Chris, the funtion of
> Creating G code from Dxf is handled in Deskam, then Desknc uses the
> g to run the drivers.
> By the way, has anyone considered adding a cnc glossary to the
> database? A complete and growing glossary would save a lot of time
> for us newbies (there seems to be a lot of us) and keep you vetrans
> from answering the same questions over & over it should contain what
> seems obvious such as drivers, steppers, servos, as well as
> acronyms.... dxf, g, cad, cam, etc as well as deeper terms like
> continuos contouring and tool radius compensation. Shoot, if enough
> of these database features are added, perhaps instead of a book we
> can just rename the group " cnc for dummies" ( if that isn't to
> insulting for our exhalted vetrans. lol) I guess I'd better end this
> novel and give someone a chance to reply
> Thanks,
> Dale
>
> In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Chris L <datac@l...> wrote:
> > There would be an interesting thing to try to find out. Just who
> was doing
> > it. I really do not recall of any real PC styled windows G-Code
> control. I do
> > recall some motion control stuff and certainly data-acc stuff.
> >
> > It was all big money.. That I remember well !
> >
> > Chris L
> >
> > ballendo wrote:
> >
> > > Chris,
> > >
> > > Lotta good stuff in this post. I've snipped one small part tho'
> > >
> > > LOTS of people/companies were doing contouring in Windows before
> > > FLashcut! Those just weren't AIMED at the low cost user... or
> large
> > > markets.
> > >
> > > Sometimes there is a tendency to forget that a world often exists
> > > beyond our current boundaries... And might have existed for some
> time.
> > >
> > > Have to say that the rest of your post is pretty spot on, IMO.
> > >
> > > Hope this helps
> > >
> > > Ballendo
> > >
> > > P.S. Is there a reason Master5 isn't being considered in this
> group?
> > > EXCELLENT contouring, NO black box. Extensive(nist EMC) gcodes
> (and
> > > other import filetypes). LOW price. Down side? Currently slow
> pulse
> > > output, but soon to change with Master6 release.
> > >
> > > --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Chris L <datac@l...> wrote:
> > > <snip>
> > > > There is also some satisfaction in recognizing that this is the
> > > company who actually "DID" make a PC based Windows control With
> > > Continuous Contouring when all the Nay-sayers said "It can not be
> > > done" and that DOS was the ONLY way ! They obviously were a
> > > bit "advanced" back then. <snip>
> > >
> > > Addresses:
> > > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > > FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> > >
> > > Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y...
> > > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@y...
> > > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@y...
> > > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@y..., wanliker@a...
> > > Moderator: jmelson@a... timg@k... [Moderator]
> > > URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> > > bill,
> > > List Manager
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>
> Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> bill,
> List Manager
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.313 / Virus Database: 174 - Release Date: 1/2/02

Discussion Thread

aspaguy 2002-01-10 20:30:06 UTC Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam William Scalione 2002-01-11 06:56:22 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam Dan Mauch 2002-01-11 07:16:12 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam Chris L 2002-01-11 18:43:35 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam ballendo 2002-01-12 04:27:34 UTC Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam Chris L 2002-01-12 14:41:02 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam aspaguy 2002-01-13 15:38:19 UTC Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam Edwin S. Katz 2002-01-13 16:09:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam Carol & Jerry Jankura 2002-01-13 17:24:16 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam Art Fenerty 2002-01-13 19:38:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam aspaguy 2002-01-13 19:58:04 UTC Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam Chris L 2002-01-13 20:21:09 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam Tim Goldstein 2002-01-13 20:37:32 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Getting started, was:Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam Chris L 2002-01-13 21:14:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam Chris L 2002-01-13 21:19:19 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Getting started, was:Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam brianjbland 2002-01-14 07:33:24 UTC Re: Getting started, was:Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam ron ginger 2002-01-14 16:37:44 UTC Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam Chris L 2002-01-14 16:44:01 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Getting started, was:Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam Chris L 2002-01-14 17:38:11 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-01-14 17:49:29 UTC Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam aspaguy 2002-01-14 19:28:36 UTC Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam Tim Goldstein 2002-01-14 20:13:18 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam aspaguy 2002-01-14 20:22:17 UTC Re: Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam Chris L 2002-01-14 21:23:35 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Getting started, was:Flashcut vs desknc for windows & Deskam