Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversion
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-06-21 10:11:51 UTC
James Owens wrote:
of a mm in inches. (Or, multiply by 1000 and you get the size of a meter,
which is 39.37.... inches.) Since this software was written by NIST, it is
essentially a "tracable standard", as they ought to be THE authority!
FORGET those miles, trying to convert inches to mm through miles is going
to get you in big trouble, I'm sure. Us common folk almost certainly have no
idea exactly how many inches or feet are in a statute mile. Land surveyors
probably are taught that in school, depending on how messy it really is, I
don;t know whether they remember it or not. (In practical terms, they can't
really use it, anyway, as everything is goofed up by the earth's curvature.)
Jon
> Hi,EMC uses the conversion factor 0.03937007874016, which is the dimension
>
> I'm working on a DRO and am having some confusion over the conversion of
> metric units to inches and back again. The device should be able to read
> glass scales down to 0.001mm or 1 micron so it is important to get this
> right.
>
> I have always used 1" = 25.4 mm but on trying to work it out with a little
> more accuracy I find that an English mile = 1.609 kilometres or 1" =
> 25.39457071 mm. but this figure changes depending on who it is coming from.
>
> Does the list have any opinions on this.
of a mm in inches. (Or, multiply by 1000 and you get the size of a meter,
which is 39.37.... inches.) Since this software was written by NIST, it is
essentially a "tracable standard", as they ought to be THE authority!
FORGET those miles, trying to convert inches to mm through miles is going
to get you in big trouble, I'm sure. Us common folk almost certainly have no
idea exactly how many inches or feet are in a statute mile. Land surveyors
probably are taught that in school, depending on how messy it really is, I
don;t know whether they remember it or not. (In practical terms, they can't
really use it, anyway, as everything is goofed up by the earth's curvature.)
Jon
Discussion Thread
James Owens
2002-06-21 03:49:05 UTC
Conversion
Dan Statman
2002-06-21 04:17:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversion
paul_alz
2002-06-21 08:28:58 UTC
Re: Conversion
afogassa
2002-06-21 08:29:33 UTC
Re: Conversion
Jon Elson
2002-06-21 10:11:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversion
mariss92705
2002-06-21 10:26:10 UTC
Re: Conversion
Dave Lantz
2002-06-21 10:28:50 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Conversion
mariss92705
2002-06-21 10:39:04 UTC
Re: Conversion
Dave Lantz
2002-06-21 10:43:12 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Conversion
Carlos Guillermo
2002-06-21 11:22:13 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Conversion
Bill Vance
2002-06-21 11:31:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversion
Dan Statman
2002-06-21 13:00:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Conversion
Doug Harrison
2002-06-21 15:27:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Conversion
Steve Blackmore
2002-06-21 16:03:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Conversion
JanRwl@A...
2002-06-21 16:40:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversion
JanRwl@A...
2002-06-21 16:50:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Conversion
mariss92705
2002-06-21 16:54:00 UTC
Re: Conversion
mariss92705
2002-06-21 16:57:51 UTC
Re: Conversion
paul_alz
2002-06-21 17:12:29 UTC
Re: Conversion
James Owens
2002-06-21 17:35:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversion
mayfieldtm
2002-06-21 19:19:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversion
vavaroutsos
2002-06-21 21:04:48 UTC
Re: Conversion
Brian Pitt
2002-06-21 22:46:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversion
bjammin@i...
2002-06-22 06:20:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Conversion
JanRwl@A...
2002-06-22 20:44:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversion
Steve Blackmore
2002-06-23 03:42:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Conversion