CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Conversion

Posted by mariss92705
on 2002-06-21 16:54:00 UTC
Hi,

I think the calculator in Windows "Programs / Accesories" must do the
math in software instead of using hardware. Fixed point decimal math
is carried out to 32 digit precision, hex math is fixed point, 64 bit
precision. Pi is correct to 32 decimal places as well. I have tested
a few transcendental functions for accuracy and it seems to be there
to 32 decimal places.

Besides Intel would never make a mistake like that; I am using the
very latest Pentium 3.999999999999965319 CPU.

Mariss

--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Steve Blackmore <steve@p...> wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 17:39:01 -0000, you wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >Loaded Google with "inch mm convert", looked thru the first dozen
or
> >so returns until I found
http://galaxies.com/Info/Math/Conversion.htm
> >
> >I got 39.3700787401575" per meter, took the 1/x of that using
Windows
> >calculator because of its nearly unlimited digit resolution.
>
> And it's inaccuracy <G>
>
> Quote
>
>
> Mike Carlton (Intel)
> USC Information Sciences Institute
>
> The Pentium (along with every other major microprocessor) uses the
> IEEE 754 standard to represent floating point numbers. A
floating-
> point number stores a real number as sign*1.XXX*2^YYY, i.e. one
> plus a fraction, raised to a power of two, along with the sign.
> The XXX part is the mantissa and the YYY part is the exponent.
>
> The IEEE standard defines a single-precision number to have a
> 23-bit mantissa. This provides 24-bit precision (counting the
> leading one) and is equal to approximately 7 decimal digits.
>
>
> Steve Blackmore
> --
> Pilot Consultancy Limited ***** Computer Consultants
> Telephone 01744 752256 Mobile 07831 768478
> Email: steve@p... WWW: http://www.pilotltd.net

Discussion Thread

James Owens 2002-06-21 03:49:05 UTC Conversion Dan Statman 2002-06-21 04:17:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversion paul_alz 2002-06-21 08:28:58 UTC Re: Conversion afogassa 2002-06-21 08:29:33 UTC Re: Conversion Jon Elson 2002-06-21 10:11:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversion mariss92705 2002-06-21 10:26:10 UTC Re: Conversion Dave Lantz 2002-06-21 10:28:50 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Conversion mariss92705 2002-06-21 10:39:04 UTC Re: Conversion Dave Lantz 2002-06-21 10:43:12 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Conversion Carlos Guillermo 2002-06-21 11:22:13 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Conversion Bill Vance 2002-06-21 11:31:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversion Dan Statman 2002-06-21 13:00:03 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Conversion Doug Harrison 2002-06-21 15:27:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Conversion Steve Blackmore 2002-06-21 16:03:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Conversion JanRwl@A... 2002-06-21 16:40:20 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversion JanRwl@A... 2002-06-21 16:50:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Conversion mariss92705 2002-06-21 16:54:00 UTC Re: Conversion mariss92705 2002-06-21 16:57:51 UTC Re: Conversion paul_alz 2002-06-21 17:12:29 UTC Re: Conversion James Owens 2002-06-21 17:35:35 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversion mayfieldtm 2002-06-21 19:19:57 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversion vavaroutsos 2002-06-21 21:04:48 UTC Re: Conversion Brian Pitt 2002-06-21 22:46:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversion bjammin@i... 2002-06-22 06:20:25 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Conversion JanRwl@A... 2002-06-22 20:44:58 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversion Steve Blackmore 2002-06-23 03:42:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Conversion