Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motors
Posted by
JanRwl@A...
on 2003-04-25 16:34:19 UTC
In a message dated 4/25/2003 5:54:28 PM Central Standard Time,
telecomt@... writes:
label as they use on their "real" steppers.
For those who like arguments, the AC-synchronous motors ARE "steppers"---just
that they run off single-phase AC (partly-converted to quasi-three-phase by
the cap. and res.). They run at EXACTLY 72 RPM, at least as "exact" as the
60.000 Hz. line-freq., or 60 RPM on the 50 Hz. AC used in Europe.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
telecomt@... writes:
> Strange thing is that it says stepping motor on the label...Yes, those S.E. SloSyn AC-synchronous motors DO have the SAME round stick-on
>
label as they use on their "real" steppers.
For those who like arguments, the AC-synchronous motors ARE "steppers"---just
that they run off single-phase AC (partly-converted to quasi-three-phase by
the cap. and res.). They run at EXACTLY 72 RPM, at least as "exact" as the
60.000 Hz. line-freq., or 60 RPM on the 50 Hz. AC used in Europe.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
PTENGIN@x...
1999-07-28 11:07:25 UTC
Re: Re: Motors
Brian Fairey
1999-07-28 11:26:11 UTC
Re: Re: Motors
Jon Elson
1999-07-28 13:35:08 UTC
Re: Re: Motors
PTENGIN@x...
1999-07-28 15:34:17 UTC
Re: Re: Motors
Robert Campbell
1999-07-28 19:37:51 UTC
Re: Re: Motors
Woody
2001-04-05 16:29:01 UTC
Motors
mariss92705@y...
2001-04-05 16:52:24 UTC
Re: Motors
Woody
2001-04-05 16:59:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motors
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2001-04-05 17:27:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-04-05 17:29:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
Woody
2001-04-05 17:39:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
JanRwl@A...
2001-04-05 18:00:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
wanliker@a...
2001-04-05 20:41:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
mariss92705@y...
2001-04-05 21:05:55 UTC
Re: Motors
Jon Elson
2001-04-05 21:42:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
Tom Eldredge
2001-04-06 04:12:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
ballendo@y...
2001-04-06 04:58:49 UTC
Re: Motors
Woody
2001-04-06 06:53:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motors
Joe Vicars
2001-04-06 06:57:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motors
e.heritage@b...
2001-04-06 07:04:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motors
Gene
2002-07-11 23:49:09 UTC
Motors
the_dutros
2002-07-12 05:17:10 UTC
Re: Motors
Gene
2002-07-12 11:04:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motors
Tim Goldstein
2002-07-12 11:23:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]Motors
JanRwl@A...
2002-07-12 20:14:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motors
mayfieldtm
2002-07-12 23:05:35 UTC
Re: Motors
alex
2003-04-25 11:33:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2003-04-25 13:32:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
alex
2003-04-25 13:37:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
JanRwl@A...
2003-04-25 14:28:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
alex
2003-04-25 14:56:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
turbulatordude
2003-04-25 15:35:12 UTC
Re: Motors
alex
2003-04-25 15:53:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motors
alex
2003-04-25 16:00:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motors
JanRwl@A...
2003-04-25 16:34:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motors
km6vv
2003-04-26 10:32:59 UTC
Re: Motors
alex
2003-04-26 14:38:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
alex
2003-04-29 10:47:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motors
Chris
2003-04-29 18:20:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motors
Jon Elson
2003-04-29 22:38:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motors
mayfieldtm
2003-04-30 09:14:47 UTC
Re: Motors
Chris
2003-04-30 17:38:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motors
onecooltoolfool
2003-05-04 18:36:39 UTC
Motors
JanRwl@A...
2003-05-04 19:36:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
Jon Elson
2003-05-04 22:52:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
onecooltoolfool
2003-05-05 04:01:26 UTC
Re: Motors