Re: Re: Motors
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 1999-07-28 13:35:08 UTC
Brian Fairey wrote:
motor. If it is a 'chopper' type drive, then the voltage could be as high as the driver
is designed for, the driver will control motor current to keep it at a safe level.
Higher voltage at the driver will allow somewhat higher motor speed, as the higher
voltage allows the inductance of the motor coils to change current direction faster.
A resistive driver can also benefit from higher voltage, but the resistors burn up a
lot of energy as heat.
Jon
> From: Brian Fairey <bfairey@...>You would normally have a higher voltage going into the driver than the rating on the
>
> I read somewhere that you can drive these motors at up to 10 times their rated voltage?
> Brian.
motor. If it is a 'chopper' type drive, then the voltage could be as high as the driver
is designed for, the driver will control motor current to keep it at a safe level.
Higher voltage at the driver will allow somewhat higher motor speed, as the higher
voltage allows the inductance of the motor coils to change current direction faster.
A resistive driver can also benefit from higher voltage, but the resistors burn up a
lot of energy as heat.
Jon
Discussion Thread
PTENGIN@x...
1999-07-28 11:07:25 UTC
Re: Re: Motors
Brian Fairey
1999-07-28 11:26:11 UTC
Re: Re: Motors
Jon Elson
1999-07-28 13:35:08 UTC
Re: Re: Motors
PTENGIN@x...
1999-07-28 15:34:17 UTC
Re: Re: Motors
Robert Campbell
1999-07-28 19:37:51 UTC
Re: Re: Motors
Woody
2001-04-05 16:29:01 UTC
Motors
mariss92705@y...
2001-04-05 16:52:24 UTC
Re: Motors
Woody
2001-04-05 16:59:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motors
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2001-04-05 17:27:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-04-05 17:29:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
Woody
2001-04-05 17:39:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
JanRwl@A...
2001-04-05 18:00:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
wanliker@a...
2001-04-05 20:41:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
mariss92705@y...
2001-04-05 21:05:55 UTC
Re: Motors
Jon Elson
2001-04-05 21:42:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
Tom Eldredge
2001-04-06 04:12:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
ballendo@y...
2001-04-06 04:58:49 UTC
Re: Motors
Woody
2001-04-06 06:53:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motors
Joe Vicars
2001-04-06 06:57:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motors
e.heritage@b...
2001-04-06 07:04:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motors
Gene
2002-07-11 23:49:09 UTC
Motors
the_dutros
2002-07-12 05:17:10 UTC
Re: Motors
Gene
2002-07-12 11:04:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motors
Tim Goldstein
2002-07-12 11:23:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]Motors
JanRwl@A...
2002-07-12 20:14:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motors
mayfieldtm
2002-07-12 23:05:35 UTC
Re: Motors
alex
2003-04-25 11:33:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2003-04-25 13:32:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
alex
2003-04-25 13:37:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
JanRwl@A...
2003-04-25 14:28:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
alex
2003-04-25 14:56:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
turbulatordude
2003-04-25 15:35:12 UTC
Re: Motors
alex
2003-04-25 15:53:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motors
alex
2003-04-25 16:00:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motors
JanRwl@A...
2003-04-25 16:34:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motors
km6vv
2003-04-26 10:32:59 UTC
Re: Motors
alex
2003-04-26 14:38:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
alex
2003-04-29 10:47:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motors
Chris
2003-04-29 18:20:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motors
Jon Elson
2003-04-29 22:38:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motors
mayfieldtm
2003-04-30 09:14:47 UTC
Re: Motors
Chris
2003-04-30 17:38:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Motors
onecooltoolfool
2003-05-04 18:36:39 UTC
Motors
JanRwl@A...
2003-05-04 19:36:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
Jon Elson
2003-05-04 22:52:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Motors
onecooltoolfool
2003-05-05 04:01:26 UTC
Re: Motors