Re: repeatable vs accurate switch
Posted by
George Richardson
on 2003-11-06 07:41:24 UTC
I've been considering this myself, and have been thinking of dual
sensors on each axis, one on the table itself for coarse position,
and another on the back of the motor for fine position.
In a stepper driven environment, this should give repeatability
limited only by the backlash in the table.
In a servo driven setup, I think you'd need a full encoder.
it if you have trouble.
there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
sensors on each axis, one on the table itself for coarse position,
and another on the back of the motor for fine position.
In a stepper driven environment, this should give repeatability
limited only by the backlash in the table.
In a servo driven setup, I think you'd need a full encoder.
> -----Original Message-----an
> From: Torsten [mailto:torsten@g...]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 1:32 AM
> To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: repeatable vs accurate switch
>
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Don Rogers <Don@C...> wrote:
> > I am working on a machine design that needs a signal that is
> repeatable to
> > a very tight tolerance. I don't care if it trips at 0.250" or at
> > 0.000250", as long as it is the same each time. My thoughts now
> are
> > focusing on optical sensors. First is just a plane flag through
> optical10X
> > coupler, and the second is a mechanical amplified version, IE a
> geartimg@k...
> > driven optical aperture.
> >
> > Any pitfalls or ideas that come to mind??
> >
> > Thanks Don
>
> Every switch should be repeatable unless the switch is broke.
> Accurate is largely defined as very fast switching in motion
> control.
> A table moving at a fast velocity is recieving a move pulse
> in microsecond intervals. The switch will have to send the
> signal also at a very fast speed to let the controller know
> that it has triggered.
> Keep in mind that if the object of the switch is to stop motion
> that a mass moving can not be stopped instantly but has to allow
> for some distance to decelerate.
> Find a suitable switch with a fast responds time.
> Good Luck
>
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@a...,
> Moderator: pentam@c... indigo_red@q... [Moderators]aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
it if you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.htmlbe a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to
there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING
> billhttp://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
Discussion Thread
Don Rogers
2003-11-04 21:22:28 UTC
repeatable vs accurate switch
John Haddy
2003-11-04 21:27:56 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] repeatable vs accurate switch
Doug Fortune
2003-11-04 21:58:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] repeatable vs accurate switch
Mariss Freimanis
2003-11-04 22:11:41 UTC
Re: repeatable vs accurate switch
Marvin Frankel
2003-11-05 01:06:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] repeatable vs accurate switch
Torsten
2003-11-05 01:32:10 UTC
Re: repeatable vs accurate switch
Mark Thompson
2003-11-05 09:20:26 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: repeatable vs accurate switch
David A. Frantz
2003-11-05 19:31:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] repeatable vs accurate switch
JanRwl@A...
2003-11-05 19:48:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] repeatable vs accurate switch
Mariss Freimanis
2003-11-05 20:29:04 UTC
Re: repeatable vs accurate switch
George Richardson
2003-11-06 07:41:24 UTC
Re: repeatable vs accurate switch
Bob Simon
2003-11-06 07:53:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: repeatable vs accurate switch
Don Rogers
2003-11-06 08:38:38 UTC
Re: repeatable vs accurate switch
Don Rogers
2003-11-06 08:42:46 UTC
Re: repeatable vs accurate switch
Don Rogers
2003-11-06 09:25:59 UTC
Re: repeatable vs accurate switch
Kim Lux
2003-11-06 12:22:01 UTC
Automatic or easier tool changes for R8 mills ?
Mike Gann
2003-11-06 12:53:04 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Automatic or easier tool changes for R8 mills ?
Kim Lux
2003-11-06 13:10:51 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Automatic or easier tool changes for R8 mills ?
Mike Gann
2003-11-06 13:21:45 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Automatic or easier tool changes for R8mills ?
Mike Gann
2003-11-06 13:34:24 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Automatic or easier tool changes for R8mills ?
Carlos Guillermo
2003-11-06 13:45:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Automatic or easier tool changes for R8mills ?
Kim Lux
2003-11-06 15:15:41 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Automatic or easier tool changes for R8mills ?
Kim Lux
2003-11-06 15:18:23 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Automatic or easier tool changes for R8mills ?
tjstraz
2003-11-06 16:23:25 UTC
Re: Automatic or easier tool changes for R8 mills ?
David A. Frantz
2003-11-06 17:16:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: repeatable vs accurate switch
cncgrumpyguy
2003-11-06 18:53:07 UTC
Re: Automatic or easier tool changes for R8 mills ?
mmurray701
2003-11-06 19:34:53 UTC
Re: Automatic or easier tool changes for R8 mills ?
Carlos Guillermo
2003-11-06 20:48:09 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Automatic or easier tool changes for R8mills?
vavaroutsos
2003-11-06 23:12:19 UTC
Re: Automatic or easier tool changes for R8 mills ?
cncgrumpyguy
2003-11-07 10:33:10 UTC
Re: Automatic or easier tool changes for R8 mills ?
mmurray701
2003-11-07 20:56:18 UTC
Re: Automatic or easier tool changes for R8 mills ?