Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] repeatable vs accurate switch
Posted by
Doug Fortune
on 2003-11-04 21:58:57 UTC
Don Rogers wrote:
better accuracy) combined with the index pulse on a rotary encoder.
Example: 200 CPR (cycles per revolution) quadrature rotary encoder with
index pulse, directly mounted on a 5 TPI (thread per inch) leadscrew
This means 200*4 = 800 pulse per revolution in quadrature, so
1 index pulse = 1/800th revolution resolution. Since a 5 TPI screw,
thats 1/(800*5) = 1/4000 = 0.000 250 inch resolution.
The machine goes until it hits the low resolution limit switch, then
it slows down and then <usually> continues in the same direction until
the index pulse is encountered. If the momentum carries it past the index
pulse, the motion is slowly reversed until the index pulse is hit once again.
Thus the condition of: limit switch ON AND index pulse HI
signals home (or zero).
Obviously there are 4 logical variations of this.
Doug Fortune
http://www.cncKITS.com
.
>Typically you'd use a limit switch (which might have a 1/100" inch or
> I am working on a machine design that needs a signal that is repeatable to
> a very tight tolerance. I don't care if it trips at 0.250" or at
> 0.000250", as long as it is the same each time. My thoughts now are
> focusing on optical sensors. First is just a plane flag through an optical
> coupler, and the second is a mechanical amplified version, IE a 10X gear
> driven optical aperture.
>
> Any pitfalls or ideas that come to mind??
better accuracy) combined with the index pulse on a rotary encoder.
Example: 200 CPR (cycles per revolution) quadrature rotary encoder with
index pulse, directly mounted on a 5 TPI (thread per inch) leadscrew
This means 200*4 = 800 pulse per revolution in quadrature, so
1 index pulse = 1/800th revolution resolution. Since a 5 TPI screw,
thats 1/(800*5) = 1/4000 = 0.000 250 inch resolution.
The machine goes until it hits the low resolution limit switch, then
it slows down and then <usually> continues in the same direction until
the index pulse is encountered. If the momentum carries it past the index
pulse, the motion is slowly reversed until the index pulse is hit once again.
Thus the condition of: limit switch ON AND index pulse HI
signals home (or zero).
Obviously there are 4 logical variations of this.
Doug Fortune
http://www.cncKITS.com
.
Discussion Thread
Don Rogers
2003-11-04 21:22:28 UTC
repeatable vs accurate switch
John Haddy
2003-11-04 21:27:56 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] repeatable vs accurate switch
Doug Fortune
2003-11-04 21:58:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] repeatable vs accurate switch
Mariss Freimanis
2003-11-04 22:11:41 UTC
Re: repeatable vs accurate switch
Marvin Frankel
2003-11-05 01:06:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] repeatable vs accurate switch
Torsten
2003-11-05 01:32:10 UTC
Re: repeatable vs accurate switch
Mark Thompson
2003-11-05 09:20:26 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: repeatable vs accurate switch
David A. Frantz
2003-11-05 19:31:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] repeatable vs accurate switch
JanRwl@A...
2003-11-05 19:48:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] repeatable vs accurate switch
Mariss Freimanis
2003-11-05 20:29:04 UTC
Re: repeatable vs accurate switch
George Richardson
2003-11-06 07:41:24 UTC
Re: repeatable vs accurate switch
Bob Simon
2003-11-06 07:53:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: repeatable vs accurate switch
Don Rogers
2003-11-06 08:38:38 UTC
Re: repeatable vs accurate switch
Don Rogers
2003-11-06 08:42:46 UTC
Re: repeatable vs accurate switch
Don Rogers
2003-11-06 09:25:59 UTC
Re: repeatable vs accurate switch
Kim Lux
2003-11-06 12:22:01 UTC
Automatic or easier tool changes for R8 mills ?
Mike Gann
2003-11-06 12:53:04 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Automatic or easier tool changes for R8 mills ?
Kim Lux
2003-11-06 13:10:51 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Automatic or easier tool changes for R8 mills ?
Mike Gann
2003-11-06 13:21:45 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Automatic or easier tool changes for R8mills ?
Mike Gann
2003-11-06 13:34:24 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Automatic or easier tool changes for R8mills ?
Carlos Guillermo
2003-11-06 13:45:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Automatic or easier tool changes for R8mills ?
Kim Lux
2003-11-06 15:15:41 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Automatic or easier tool changes for R8mills ?
Kim Lux
2003-11-06 15:18:23 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Automatic or easier tool changes for R8mills ?
tjstraz
2003-11-06 16:23:25 UTC
Re: Automatic or easier tool changes for R8 mills ?
David A. Frantz
2003-11-06 17:16:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: repeatable vs accurate switch
cncgrumpyguy
2003-11-06 18:53:07 UTC
Re: Automatic or easier tool changes for R8 mills ?
mmurray701
2003-11-06 19:34:53 UTC
Re: Automatic or easier tool changes for R8 mills ?
Carlos Guillermo
2003-11-06 20:48:09 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Automatic or easier tool changes for R8mills?
vavaroutsos
2003-11-06 23:12:19 UTC
Re: Automatic or easier tool changes for R8 mills ?
cncgrumpyguy
2003-11-07 10:33:10 UTC
Re: Automatic or easier tool changes for R8 mills ?
mmurray701
2003-11-07 20:56:18 UTC
Re: Automatic or easier tool changes for R8 mills ?