CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop

Posted by Bill Vance
on 2004-03-09 16:59:07 UTC
Hi guys;

I'm not sure where to find them these days, but if you do this, I would recomend
you get or make the kind of handwheels where the handle that sticks out from the
wheel has a little leaf spring that holds it in place, so that when it isn't
needed, it can be folded down across the diameter of the wheel, held in place by
the same spring. A detent might work here, too.

Bill


On Tue Mar 9 11:14:03 2004 Kevin R. Walsh wrote:

>--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "ballendo" <ballendo@y...>
>wrote:
>> Kevin,
>>
>> You have CNC. Why on earth would you need handles?!?
>>
>> And just think, the Bridgeport engineers left them off of hundreds
>of
>> machines... (Were they dummies to do so?) Bacause they
>> certainly "could have" left them on if they thought there was a
>> reason... (It's not like they didn't have them "available" in the
>> Bridgeport factory!)
>>
>> I'll never understand this idea that handwheels are somehow a good
>> thing to have on a cnc machine. I've laid out the reasons I feel
>this
>> way many times before; so I won't repeat them here...
>>
>> Suffice to say that being able to move in any given increment, at a
>> speed faster than I can turn any handwheel, and stop on the EXACT
>> spot I desire repeatedly, for me at least renders handwheels
>> unnecessary... (and a safety hazard)
>>
>> Ballendo
>
>Let's just say that I've been turning the handles myself now for
>about 12 years, so I'd miss 'em if they were gone! All kidding
>aside, the flexiblity to be able to swtich from manual to CNC by
>simply pushing the enable/disable is too easy to pass up. On my BOSS
>machine the Y and Z are simple to put handles on by putting
>extensions on the motor shafts (the Z already has one, actually).
>The X is more difficult, as Jon mentioned, because the nut is
>buried. This can be accomplished with a double shafted motor, which
>is what I'll look into.
>
>Kevin


--
********************************************************************************
* *
RKBA! * Blessings on thee, oh Israel!!! * 4-19!
* *
********************************************************************************

An _EFFECTIVE_ | Insured by | All Matter is vibration. | Let he who hath no
weapon in every | by Colt; | --Max Planck | weapon, sell his
hand = Freedom | Dial | In the beginning was the | garment, and buy a
on every side!! | 1-1911-A1 | Word. --The Holy Bible | sword. --Jesus Christ

********************************************************************************

Constitutional Government is dead! LONG LIVE THE CONSTITUTION!!!!!!

********************************************************************************

Discussion Thread

snagglexr650 2004-03-08 03:59:50 UTC true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop Mariss Freimanis 2004-03-08 07:11:11 UTC Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop David A. Frantz 2004-03-08 07:43:07 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop ballendo 2004-03-08 08:01:47 UTC Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop Jon Elson 2004-03-08 10:22:05 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop Kevin R. Walsh 2004-03-08 14:55:45 UTC Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop Jon Elson 2004-03-08 20:05:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop ballendo 2004-03-09 08:21:51 UTC Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop Jon Elson 2004-03-09 09:42:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop Kevin R. Walsh 2004-03-09 11:14:07 UTC Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop Abby Katt 2004-03-09 13:58:42 UTC Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop Kim Lux 2004-03-09 15:44:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop Bill Vance 2004-03-09 16:59:07 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop Ron K 2004-03-09 17:43:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop Mariss Freimanis 2004-03-09 18:23:19 UTC Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop Marcus and Eva 2004-03-09 19:12:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop Raymond Heckert 2004-03-09 19:13:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop Marcus and Eva 2004-03-10 07:58:14 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop C.S. Mo 2004-03-10 08:12:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop industrialhobbies 2004-03-10 09:27:21 UTC Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop Raymond Heckert 2004-03-10 20:09:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop Raymond Heckert 2004-03-10 20:09:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop ballendo 2004-03-10 21:58:20 UTC Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop ballendo 2004-03-10 23:01:02 UTC Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop ballendo 2004-03-10 23:02:31 UTC Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop ballendo 2004-03-11 06:32:35 UTC real tests needed was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop ballendo 2004-03-11 06:33:13 UTC Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop ballendo 2004-03-11 09:09:46 UTC Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop ballendo 2004-03-11 09:13:42 UTC Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop ballendo 2004-03-11 09:13:43 UTC Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop ballendo 2004-03-11 09:14:09 UTC Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop Jon Elson 2004-03-11 09:19:46 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] real tests needed was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop Mariss Freimanis 2004-03-11 09:32:39 UTC real tests needed was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop Raymond Heckert 2004-03-11 20:30:40 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop Raymond Heckert 2004-03-11 20:30:49 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] real tests needed was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop turbulatordude 2004-03-12 06:02:34 UTC Photo's section ( was real tests needed was Re: true closed loop stevenson_engineers 2004-03-12 07:11:05 UTC real tests needed was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop