Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Posted by
Abby Katt
on 2004-03-09 13:58:42 UTC
I think despite the fact you could rig up some encoders to jog the
mill for you, there is something useful about the actual feedback you
get from manual milling. I started with CNC and never really got an
idea of how much force was needed to perform various cutting
operations. The first time I actually disconnected the motors from
the controller and hand-jogged the mill, I realized how powerful it
was. Sometimes when I'm cutting new materials (I was playing with a
Tungsten Carbide cutter and some Titanum the other day) it's really
nice to be able to get a "hands-on feel" for how the mill is cutting
the material without pinging an end-mill or stalling your drive. Most
hobby CNC really has no way of telling you how "hard" something is,
or how confident you should be when cutting U-deep at V-feed... but
you can find out in a few seconds by hand-cranking it.
And it stills seems miles faster to do it manually when I'm too lazy
to saw something and just cut it off with an end-mill. :)
My 2p (3.6c) :)
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "ballendo" <ballendo@y...>
wrote:
mill for you, there is something useful about the actual feedback you
get from manual milling. I started with CNC and never really got an
idea of how much force was needed to perform various cutting
operations. The first time I actually disconnected the motors from
the controller and hand-jogged the mill, I realized how powerful it
was. Sometimes when I'm cutting new materials (I was playing with a
Tungsten Carbide cutter and some Titanum the other day) it's really
nice to be able to get a "hands-on feel" for how the mill is cutting
the material without pinging an end-mill or stalling your drive. Most
hobby CNC really has no way of telling you how "hard" something is,
or how confident you should be when cutting U-deep at V-feed... but
you can find out in a few seconds by hand-cranking it.
And it stills seems miles faster to do it manually when I'm too lazy
to saw something and just cut it off with an end-mill. :)
My 2p (3.6c) :)
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "ballendo" <ballendo@y...>
wrote:
> Kevin,of
>
> You have CNC. Why on earth would you need handles?!?
>
> And just think, the Bridgeport engineers left them off of hundreds
> machines... (Were they dummies to do so?) Bacause theythis
> certainly "could have" left them on if they thought there was a
> reason... (It's not like they didn't have them "available" in the
> Bridgeport factory!)
>
> I'll never understand this idea that handwheels are somehow a good
> thing to have on a cnc machine. I've laid out the reasons I feel
> way many times before; so I won't repeat them here...could
>
> Suffice to say that being able to move in any given increment, at a
> speed faster than I can turn any handwheel, and stop on the EXACT
> spot I desire repeatedly, for me at least renders handwheels
> unnecessary... (and a safety hazard)
>
> Ballendo
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Kevin R. Walsh"
> <krwalsh@y...> wrote:
> >Anyone have any luck fitting handle to the old Bridgeport CNC
> machines? I can easily get one on the Z drive. The Y drive I
> maybe see how I can modify the belt cover and put a handle in.What
> about the X?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Kevin
Discussion Thread
snagglexr650
2004-03-08 03:59:50 UTC
true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Mariss Freimanis
2004-03-08 07:11:11 UTC
Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
David A. Frantz
2004-03-08 07:43:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
ballendo
2004-03-08 08:01:47 UTC
Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Jon Elson
2004-03-08 10:22:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Kevin R. Walsh
2004-03-08 14:55:45 UTC
Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Jon Elson
2004-03-08 20:05:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
ballendo
2004-03-09 08:21:51 UTC
Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Jon Elson
2004-03-09 09:42:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Kevin R. Walsh
2004-03-09 11:14:07 UTC
Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Abby Katt
2004-03-09 13:58:42 UTC
Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Kim Lux
2004-03-09 15:44:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Bill Vance
2004-03-09 16:59:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Ron K
2004-03-09 17:43:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Mariss Freimanis
2004-03-09 18:23:19 UTC
Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Marcus and Eva
2004-03-09 19:12:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Raymond Heckert
2004-03-09 19:13:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Marcus and Eva
2004-03-10 07:58:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
C.S. Mo
2004-03-10 08:12:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
industrialhobbies
2004-03-10 09:27:21 UTC
Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Raymond Heckert
2004-03-10 20:09:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Raymond Heckert
2004-03-10 20:09:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
ballendo
2004-03-10 21:58:20 UTC
Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
ballendo
2004-03-10 23:01:02 UTC
Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
ballendo
2004-03-10 23:02:31 UTC
Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
ballendo
2004-03-11 06:32:35 UTC
real tests needed was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
ballendo
2004-03-11 06:33:13 UTC
Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
ballendo
2004-03-11 09:09:46 UTC
Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
ballendo
2004-03-11 09:13:42 UTC
Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
ballendo
2004-03-11 09:13:43 UTC
Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
ballendo
2004-03-11 09:14:09 UTC
Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Jon Elson
2004-03-11 09:19:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] real tests needed was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Mariss Freimanis
2004-03-11 09:32:39 UTC
real tests needed was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Raymond Heckert
2004-03-11 20:30:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Raymond Heckert
2004-03-11 20:30:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] real tests needed was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
turbulatordude
2004-03-12 06:02:34 UTC
Photo's section ( was real tests needed was Re: true closed loop
stevenson_engineers
2004-03-12 07:11:05 UTC
real tests needed was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop