Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Posted by
ballendo
on 2004-03-11 09:13:42 UTC
Ray,
I too have used CNC machines in the "real-world"...
Are you talking about an MPG? Or other electronic handwheel? Because
that's NOT what's being discussed here...
We're talking about why you need to manually turn a handwheel that
isn't tied to the control in any way...
I'd bet I can find an edge with my jog buttons faster and more
accurately than you can turn a mechanical handwheel to do the same
job. Especially the more accurately part. Because I can "click" off
the part feature .0001 (or whatever the machine resolution will
allow) at a time. reliably. repeatably. If I'm using an edge finder,
there's gonna be no mistake as to when it "kicks" or "lights"...
So if we're looking for the EXACT "edge" mine's gonna be better'n
yers...
If the feature is a hole, I'm gonna beat ya even more because I can
call a "hole center finding" macro or code with MDI. Meanwhile you'll
be turning those handwheels manually and touching off at least 4-6
times. So I'll again be faster, and again more accurate.
Ballendo
P.S. The thing I find really interesting about this whole issue is
that I've found that the use of jog and MDI makes the SIMPLEST things
faster and better. ONE hole. ONE cut. One setup.
It was one of the greatest discovery's for me with CNC; having been
using manual machines before. I can setup and cut these simple things
MUCH faster WITH cnc than before. All I had to do is think CNC
instead of "manual". Which is inhibited by having handwheels, because
we humans tend to go with the familiar over the unknown... Even when
we're dead wrong...
As the civil war general in the tent told his secretary, "Tell that
salesman to get out of here! We're trying to win a battle!"
Outside the tent stood the salesman. Next to his product. A gatling
gun.
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Raymond Heckert" <jnr@a...>
wrote:
I too have used CNC machines in the "real-world"...
Are you talking about an MPG? Or other electronic handwheel? Because
that's NOT what's being discussed here...
We're talking about why you need to manually turn a handwheel that
isn't tied to the control in any way...
I'd bet I can find an edge with my jog buttons faster and more
accurately than you can turn a mechanical handwheel to do the same
job. Especially the more accurately part. Because I can "click" off
the part feature .0001 (or whatever the machine resolution will
allow) at a time. reliably. repeatably. If I'm using an edge finder,
there's gonna be no mistake as to when it "kicks" or "lights"...
So if we're looking for the EXACT "edge" mine's gonna be better'n
yers...
If the feature is a hole, I'm gonna beat ya even more because I can
call a "hole center finding" macro or code with MDI. Meanwhile you'll
be turning those handwheels manually and touching off at least 4-6
times. So I'll again be faster, and again more accurate.
Ballendo
P.S. The thing I find really interesting about this whole issue is
that I've found that the use of jog and MDI makes the SIMPLEST things
faster and better. ONE hole. ONE cut. One setup.
It was one of the greatest discovery's for me with CNC; having been
using manual machines before. I can setup and cut these simple things
MUCH faster WITH cnc than before. All I had to do is think CNC
instead of "manual". Which is inhibited by having handwheels, because
we humans tend to go with the familiar over the unknown... Even when
we're dead wrong...
As the civil war general in the tent told his secretary, "Tell that
salesman to get out of here! We're trying to win a battle!"
Outside the tent stood the salesman. Next to his product. A gatling
gun.
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Raymond Heckert" <jnr@a...>
wrote:
> As one who has operated a CNC machine in the 'real world', I canattest to
> the need for handwheels. By far, the majority of jobs I've runrequire the
> G92-ing of the workpiece from some feature on the part. Also,reworking or
> re-installing the part for subsequent operations is also sometimesreference
> required. It's so handy to use the handwheel to get to that
> point.
>
> RayHex
>
> ----------
> > From: ballendo <ballendo@y...>
> >
> > Kevin,
> >
> > You have CNC. Why on earth would you need handles?!?
> >
> <snip>
Discussion Thread
snagglexr650
2004-03-08 03:59:50 UTC
true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Mariss Freimanis
2004-03-08 07:11:11 UTC
Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
David A. Frantz
2004-03-08 07:43:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
ballendo
2004-03-08 08:01:47 UTC
Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Jon Elson
2004-03-08 10:22:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Kevin R. Walsh
2004-03-08 14:55:45 UTC
Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Jon Elson
2004-03-08 20:05:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
ballendo
2004-03-09 08:21:51 UTC
Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Jon Elson
2004-03-09 09:42:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Kevin R. Walsh
2004-03-09 11:14:07 UTC
Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Abby Katt
2004-03-09 13:58:42 UTC
Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Kim Lux
2004-03-09 15:44:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Bill Vance
2004-03-09 16:59:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Ron K
2004-03-09 17:43:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Mariss Freimanis
2004-03-09 18:23:19 UTC
Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Marcus and Eva
2004-03-09 19:12:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Raymond Heckert
2004-03-09 19:13:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Marcus and Eva
2004-03-10 07:58:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
C.S. Mo
2004-03-10 08:12:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
industrialhobbies
2004-03-10 09:27:21 UTC
Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Raymond Heckert
2004-03-10 20:09:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Raymond Heckert
2004-03-10 20:09:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
ballendo
2004-03-10 21:58:20 UTC
Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
ballendo
2004-03-10 23:01:02 UTC
Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
ballendo
2004-03-10 23:02:31 UTC
Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
ballendo
2004-03-11 06:32:35 UTC
real tests needed was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
ballendo
2004-03-11 06:33:13 UTC
Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
ballendo
2004-03-11 09:09:46 UTC
Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
ballendo
2004-03-11 09:13:42 UTC
Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
ballendo
2004-03-11 09:13:43 UTC
Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
ballendo
2004-03-11 09:14:09 UTC
Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Jon Elson
2004-03-11 09:19:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] real tests needed was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Mariss Freimanis
2004-03-11 09:32:39 UTC
real tests needed was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Raymond Heckert
2004-03-11 20:30:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Handwheels again?!? was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
Raymond Heckert
2004-03-11 20:30:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] real tests needed was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop
turbulatordude
2004-03-12 06:02:34 UTC
Photo's section ( was real tests needed was Re: true closed loop
stevenson_engineers
2004-03-12 07:11:05 UTC
real tests needed was Re: true closed loop vs. hobby closed loop