CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: plasma accuracy

Posted by caudlet
on 2004-12-18 08:35:55 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Graham Stabler" <eexgs@n...>
wrote:
>
> > There is a guy who made his own power supply for a a little over
> $100
> > bux.
> >
> > I hear that a standard machine can do 20 to 45 thou as a standard
> > kerf and the Hypertherm fine cut can do less than 10 thou.
> >
> > If one was to cut lots of shim, say for production, I would look
> > seriously at a low power laser.
> >
> > Dave
>
> I would be interested in hearing about that guy. I have a 50W C02
> laser but micro plasma seems a cool idea to me and very
homebrewable
> in comparison.

The secret to plasma cutting (and I would like to see a standard
machine that can hold .025 kerf width) is NOT the power supply. It
is just a rather crude constant current source that has a an open arc
voltage of around 200 Volts and cuts at about 70 to 100 VDC.

The challenge is to first ionize and "ignite" the air to make the
30,000 deg plasma flame and then *control* it so it doesn't cook all
of the surrounding components. Most torchs have specially designed
swirl chambers to spin the air as it exits the tip. The torch handle
and it's design are what largely controls the quality of the cut.

Hypertherm makes a "Fine cut" series of consumables for some of their
torch models that will hold .025 under perfect conditions, but .010
is doubtful.

Precision plasma (different technology and $$$$$) uses shielding
gases other than shop air and uses oxygen (I think) for the plasma
and will do some fine cutting.

Using a standard plasma to cut foil is like driving a tack with a
sledge hammer.

I'm real happy when my torch holds a .062 kerf and depending on the
wear on the consumables it can climb to .080 or higher. Pierce points
can be double the cut kerf in diameter. I try to plan my cuts so
things that need detail are cut first on a new set of consumables.

Discussion Thread

sargossa_99 2004-12-17 06:58:00 UTC plasma accuracy turbulatordude 2004-12-17 11:19:50 UTC Re: plasma accuracy Graham Stabler 2004-12-17 13:35:47 UTC Re: plasma accuracy V FONG 2004-12-17 14:33:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy turbulatordude 2004-12-17 15:22:18 UTC Re: plasma accuracy Graham Stabler 2004-12-17 15:50:52 UTC Re: plasma accuracy John Heritage 2004-12-18 07:30:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy Graham Stabler 2004-12-18 08:35:04 UTC Re: plasma accuracy caudlet 2004-12-18 08:35:55 UTC Re: plasma accuracy Graham Stabler 2004-12-18 09:12:58 UTC Re: plasma accuracy R Rogers 2004-12-18 09:38:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy turbulatordude 2004-12-18 10:46:15 UTC Re: plasma accuracy caudlet 2004-12-18 13:55:31 UTC Re: plasma accuracy metlmunchr 2004-12-18 15:14:59 UTC Re: plasma accuracy Hal Eckhart 2004-12-18 15:42:28 UTC gecko 201/210 opinions Raymond Heckert 2004-12-18 17:24:32 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] plasma accuracy Raymond Heckert 2004-12-18 17:24:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy caudlet 2004-12-18 17:39:34 UTC Re: gecko 201/210 opinions Hal Eckhart 2004-12-18 18:31:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: gecko 201/210 opinions Hal Eckhart 2004-12-18 18:53:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] plasma accuracy Jon Elson 2004-12-18 20:40:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] gecko 201/210 opinions turbulatordude 2004-12-18 21:40:12 UTC Re: plasma accuracy Randy Brown 2004-12-19 08:03:26 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy caudlet 2004-12-19 13:12:59 UTC Re: gecko 201/210 opinions m0nkey0ne 2004-12-20 16:22:25 UTC Re: plasma accuracy R Rogers 2004-12-20 17:40:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy turbulatordude 2004-12-20 23:26:48 UTC Re: plasma accuracy Randy Wilson 2004-12-21 05:42:05 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy Bruce Pigeon 2004-12-21 09:40:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy turbulatordude 2004-12-21 09:46:24 UTC Re: plasma accuracy