Re: plasma accuracy
Posted by
turbulatordude
on 2004-12-17 11:19:50 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "sargossa_99" <rmcbeath@i...>
wrote:
errors.
If your table is only good to 0.05 postion and your plasma is also
good to 0.05, then you can be as far as +0.1 one way, or -0.1 the
other, or +/- 0.2. that is nearly a quarter inch off.
There are what I call windows.
Getting a POC machine to hold 1/16 postitioning is easy with stone
knives and bear skin coats.
Getting 0.02 is easy with general home shop novice abilities.
Getting 0.005" is where the wall effect comes in. beyond that, the
costs start to rise geometrically.
The truth is that a steel plate, 1/2 thick will flex a couple thou
when putting things together.
And, there is a a not-often discussed phenonomen (sp?) your machine
may be within 0.00005 for short distances so a small part will mate
up with another small part. but over a foot the machine could be out
0.01" but... the parts still fit easily becasue both parts are out
that much. Not sure if it is a false sence of accomplishment or if
it is the nature of the beast.
A bicycle chain will cog to some degree, but for plasma, that is not
a horrible error.
Dave
wrote:
>itself
> I've been looking at some plasma machines, and some of the accuracy
> numbers they throw about seem ridiculous. I mean, the cutter
> isn't going to be too accurate, is it?rolled
>
> So, realistically, what sort of accuracy level would you want to
> build a table to? Do you need precision rails, or would cold
> with care do?thought
>
> Just seems to me to be a case of why build it more accurate than it
> can possibly cut anyway (therefore much more expensive), so I
> I would ask.total error is the square root of the sum of the square of all the
>
> Thanks
>
> Rod
errors.
If your table is only good to 0.05 postion and your plasma is also
good to 0.05, then you can be as far as +0.1 one way, or -0.1 the
other, or +/- 0.2. that is nearly a quarter inch off.
There are what I call windows.
Getting a POC machine to hold 1/16 postitioning is easy with stone
knives and bear skin coats.
Getting 0.02 is easy with general home shop novice abilities.
Getting 0.005" is where the wall effect comes in. beyond that, the
costs start to rise geometrically.
The truth is that a steel plate, 1/2 thick will flex a couple thou
when putting things together.
And, there is a a not-often discussed phenonomen (sp?) your machine
may be within 0.00005 for short distances so a small part will mate
up with another small part. but over a foot the machine could be out
0.01" but... the parts still fit easily becasue both parts are out
that much. Not sure if it is a false sence of accomplishment or if
it is the nature of the beast.
A bicycle chain will cog to some degree, but for plasma, that is not
a horrible error.
Dave
Discussion Thread
sargossa_99
2004-12-17 06:58:00 UTC
plasma accuracy
turbulatordude
2004-12-17 11:19:50 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
Graham Stabler
2004-12-17 13:35:47 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
V FONG
2004-12-17 14:33:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
turbulatordude
2004-12-17 15:22:18 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
Graham Stabler
2004-12-17 15:50:52 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
John Heritage
2004-12-18 07:30:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
Graham Stabler
2004-12-18 08:35:04 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
caudlet
2004-12-18 08:35:55 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
Graham Stabler
2004-12-18 09:12:58 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
R Rogers
2004-12-18 09:38:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
turbulatordude
2004-12-18 10:46:15 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
caudlet
2004-12-18 13:55:31 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
metlmunchr
2004-12-18 15:14:59 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
Hal Eckhart
2004-12-18 15:42:28 UTC
gecko 201/210 opinions
Raymond Heckert
2004-12-18 17:24:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] plasma accuracy
Raymond Heckert
2004-12-18 17:24:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
caudlet
2004-12-18 17:39:34 UTC
Re: gecko 201/210 opinions
Hal Eckhart
2004-12-18 18:31:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: gecko 201/210 opinions
Hal Eckhart
2004-12-18 18:53:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] plasma accuracy
Jon Elson
2004-12-18 20:40:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] gecko 201/210 opinions
turbulatordude
2004-12-18 21:40:12 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
Randy Brown
2004-12-19 08:03:26 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
caudlet
2004-12-19 13:12:59 UTC
Re: gecko 201/210 opinions
m0nkey0ne
2004-12-20 16:22:25 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
R Rogers
2004-12-20 17:40:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
turbulatordude
2004-12-20 23:26:48 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
Randy Wilson
2004-12-21 05:42:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
Bruce Pigeon
2004-12-21 09:40:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
turbulatordude
2004-12-21 09:46:24 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy