CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: plasma accuracy

on 2004-12-17 11:19:50 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "sargossa_99" <rmcbeath@i...>
wrote:
>
> I've been looking at some plasma machines, and some of the accuracy
> numbers they throw about seem ridiculous. I mean, the cutter
itself
> isn't going to be too accurate, is it?
>
> So, realistically, what sort of accuracy level would you want to
> build a table to? Do you need precision rails, or would cold
rolled
> with care do?
>
> Just seems to me to be a case of why build it more accurate than it
> can possibly cut anyway (therefore much more expensive), so I
thought
> I would ask.
>
> Thanks
>
> Rod


total error is the square root of the sum of the square of all the
errors.

If your table is only good to 0.05 postion and your plasma is also
good to 0.05, then you can be as far as +0.1 one way, or -0.1 the
other, or +/- 0.2. that is nearly a quarter inch off.

There are what I call windows.

Getting a POC machine to hold 1/16 postitioning is easy with stone
knives and bear skin coats.

Getting 0.02 is easy with general home shop novice abilities.

Getting 0.005" is where the wall effect comes in. beyond that, the
costs start to rise geometrically.

The truth is that a steel plate, 1/2 thick will flex a couple thou
when putting things together.

And, there is a a not-often discussed phenonomen (sp?) your machine
may be within 0.00005 for short distances so a small part will mate
up with another small part. but over a foot the machine could be out
0.01" but... the parts still fit easily becasue both parts are out
that much. Not sure if it is a false sence of accomplishment or if
it is the nature of the beast.

A bicycle chain will cog to some degree, but for plasma, that is not
a horrible error.

Dave

Discussion Thread

sargossa_99 2004-12-17 06:58:00 UTC plasma accuracy turbulatordude 2004-12-17 11:19:50 UTC Re: plasma accuracy Graham Stabler 2004-12-17 13:35:47 UTC Re: plasma accuracy V FONG 2004-12-17 14:33:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy turbulatordude 2004-12-17 15:22:18 UTC Re: plasma accuracy Graham Stabler 2004-12-17 15:50:52 UTC Re: plasma accuracy John Heritage 2004-12-18 07:30:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy Graham Stabler 2004-12-18 08:35:04 UTC Re: plasma accuracy caudlet 2004-12-18 08:35:55 UTC Re: plasma accuracy Graham Stabler 2004-12-18 09:12:58 UTC Re: plasma accuracy R Rogers 2004-12-18 09:38:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy turbulatordude 2004-12-18 10:46:15 UTC Re: plasma accuracy caudlet 2004-12-18 13:55:31 UTC Re: plasma accuracy metlmunchr 2004-12-18 15:14:59 UTC Re: plasma accuracy Hal Eckhart 2004-12-18 15:42:28 UTC gecko 201/210 opinions Raymond Heckert 2004-12-18 17:24:32 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] plasma accuracy Raymond Heckert 2004-12-18 17:24:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy caudlet 2004-12-18 17:39:34 UTC Re: gecko 201/210 opinions Hal Eckhart 2004-12-18 18:31:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: gecko 201/210 opinions Hal Eckhart 2004-12-18 18:53:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] plasma accuracy Jon Elson 2004-12-18 20:40:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] gecko 201/210 opinions turbulatordude 2004-12-18 21:40:12 UTC Re: plasma accuracy Randy Brown 2004-12-19 08:03:26 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy caudlet 2004-12-19 13:12:59 UTC Re: gecko 201/210 opinions m0nkey0ne 2004-12-20 16:22:25 UTC Re: plasma accuracy R Rogers 2004-12-20 17:40:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy turbulatordude 2004-12-20 23:26:48 UTC Re: plasma accuracy Randy Wilson 2004-12-21 05:42:05 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy Bruce Pigeon 2004-12-21 09:40:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy turbulatordude 2004-12-21 09:46:24 UTC Re: plasma accuracy