Re: plasma accuracy
Posted by
turbulatordude
on 2004-12-20 23:26:48 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, R Rogers <rogersmach@y...>
wrote:
regarding tip failure? Argon would be better probably but much more
expensive.
moisture pretty easily. Albeit with some work.
A post compressor heat exchanger would help drop the compressed air
temperature somewhat.
A simple refrigerator with airline coiled inside would offer a
mechanical cooling of the air line.
The exit air of the refrigerator could then be used as the pre-
cooling side of the heat exchanger. Warming the air to the torch,
but using some of the colder refrigerated air to pre-cool the air
entering the refrigerator. This would reduce the load on the
refrigerator.
Putting a bucket of water in the frige and the coil in tht would add
a signifigant thermal mass also.
Just some ideas.
Dave
wrote:
> Oh ok, well that makes sense. moisture in the air being conductive.Could one use an inert gas such as Co2 with better results than air
regarding tip failure? Argon would be better probably but much more
expensive.
>I'm not sure of the air volume, but you can solve the compressed air
> Ron
moisture pretty easily. Albeit with some work.
A post compressor heat exchanger would help drop the compressed air
temperature somewhat.
A simple refrigerator with airline coiled inside would offer a
mechanical cooling of the air line.
The exit air of the refrigerator could then be used as the pre-
cooling side of the heat exchanger. Warming the air to the torch,
but using some of the colder refrigerated air to pre-cool the air
entering the refrigerator. This would reduce the load on the
refrigerator.
Putting a bucket of water in the frige and the coil in tht would add
a signifigant thermal mass also.
Just some ideas.
Dave
Discussion Thread
sargossa_99
2004-12-17 06:58:00 UTC
plasma accuracy
turbulatordude
2004-12-17 11:19:50 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
Graham Stabler
2004-12-17 13:35:47 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
V FONG
2004-12-17 14:33:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
turbulatordude
2004-12-17 15:22:18 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
Graham Stabler
2004-12-17 15:50:52 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
John Heritage
2004-12-18 07:30:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
Graham Stabler
2004-12-18 08:35:04 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
caudlet
2004-12-18 08:35:55 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
Graham Stabler
2004-12-18 09:12:58 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
R Rogers
2004-12-18 09:38:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
turbulatordude
2004-12-18 10:46:15 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
caudlet
2004-12-18 13:55:31 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
metlmunchr
2004-12-18 15:14:59 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
Hal Eckhart
2004-12-18 15:42:28 UTC
gecko 201/210 opinions
Raymond Heckert
2004-12-18 17:24:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] plasma accuracy
Raymond Heckert
2004-12-18 17:24:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
caudlet
2004-12-18 17:39:34 UTC
Re: gecko 201/210 opinions
Hal Eckhart
2004-12-18 18:31:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: gecko 201/210 opinions
Hal Eckhart
2004-12-18 18:53:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] plasma accuracy
Jon Elson
2004-12-18 20:40:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] gecko 201/210 opinions
turbulatordude
2004-12-18 21:40:12 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
Randy Brown
2004-12-19 08:03:26 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
caudlet
2004-12-19 13:12:59 UTC
Re: gecko 201/210 opinions
m0nkey0ne
2004-12-20 16:22:25 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
R Rogers
2004-12-20 17:40:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
turbulatordude
2004-12-20 23:26:48 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
Randy Wilson
2004-12-21 05:42:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
Bruce Pigeon
2004-12-21 09:40:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
turbulatordude
2004-12-21 09:46:24 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy