CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: plasma accuracy

on 2004-12-18 09:12:58 UTC
Most of the cutting heads seem to be a body with the various
consumables screwed onto the end. The torches as a whole (with long
cables, hoses, switch etc) seem to quite expensive where as the
business end parts seem to be quite cheap.

If these parts were mounted in a homebrew head and low power
settings used on some power supply or other, could such a devive be
used for thin material. When I say shim it could well be thicker
than foil.

Is the cutting voltage of 70-100 actually due to the requiremet of a
decent working distance? Could a short working distance be used
with decreased voltage?

Graham



> The secret to plasma cutting (and I would like to see a standard
> machine that can hold .025 kerf width) is NOT the power supply.
It
> is just a rather crude constant current source that has a an open
arc
> voltage of around 200 Volts and cuts at about 70 to 100 VDC.
>
> The challenge is to first ionize and "ignite" the air to make the
> 30,000 deg plasma flame and then *control* it so it doesn't cook
all
> of the surrounding components. Most torchs have specially designed
> swirl chambers to spin the air as it exits the tip. The torch
handle
> and it's design are what largely controls the quality of the cut.
>
> Hypertherm makes a "Fine cut" series of consumables for some of
their
> torch models that will hold .025 under perfect conditions,
but .010
> is doubtful.
>
> Precision plasma (different technology and $$$$$) uses shielding
> gases other than shop air and uses oxygen (I think) for the plasma
> and will do some fine cutting.
>
> Using a standard plasma to cut foil is like driving a tack with a
> sledge hammer.
>
> I'm real happy when my torch holds a .062 kerf and depending on
the
> wear on the consumables it can climb to .080 or higher. Pierce
points
> can be double the cut kerf in diameter. I try to plan my cuts so
> things that need detail are cut first on a new set of consumables.

Discussion Thread

sargossa_99 2004-12-17 06:58:00 UTC plasma accuracy turbulatordude 2004-12-17 11:19:50 UTC Re: plasma accuracy Graham Stabler 2004-12-17 13:35:47 UTC Re: plasma accuracy V FONG 2004-12-17 14:33:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy turbulatordude 2004-12-17 15:22:18 UTC Re: plasma accuracy Graham Stabler 2004-12-17 15:50:52 UTC Re: plasma accuracy John Heritage 2004-12-18 07:30:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy Graham Stabler 2004-12-18 08:35:04 UTC Re: plasma accuracy caudlet 2004-12-18 08:35:55 UTC Re: plasma accuracy Graham Stabler 2004-12-18 09:12:58 UTC Re: plasma accuracy R Rogers 2004-12-18 09:38:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy turbulatordude 2004-12-18 10:46:15 UTC Re: plasma accuracy caudlet 2004-12-18 13:55:31 UTC Re: plasma accuracy metlmunchr 2004-12-18 15:14:59 UTC Re: plasma accuracy Hal Eckhart 2004-12-18 15:42:28 UTC gecko 201/210 opinions Raymond Heckert 2004-12-18 17:24:32 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] plasma accuracy Raymond Heckert 2004-12-18 17:24:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy caudlet 2004-12-18 17:39:34 UTC Re: gecko 201/210 opinions Hal Eckhart 2004-12-18 18:31:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: gecko 201/210 opinions Hal Eckhart 2004-12-18 18:53:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] plasma accuracy Jon Elson 2004-12-18 20:40:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] gecko 201/210 opinions turbulatordude 2004-12-18 21:40:12 UTC Re: plasma accuracy Randy Brown 2004-12-19 08:03:26 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy caudlet 2004-12-19 13:12:59 UTC Re: gecko 201/210 opinions m0nkey0ne 2004-12-20 16:22:25 UTC Re: plasma accuracy R Rogers 2004-12-20 17:40:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy turbulatordude 2004-12-20 23:26:48 UTC Re: plasma accuracy Randy Wilson 2004-12-21 05:42:05 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy Bruce Pigeon 2004-12-21 09:40:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy turbulatordude 2004-12-21 09:46:24 UTC Re: plasma accuracy