Re: plasma accuracy
Posted by
Graham Stabler
on 2004-12-18 09:12:58 UTC
Most of the cutting heads seem to be a body with the various
consumables screwed onto the end. The torches as a whole (with long
cables, hoses, switch etc) seem to quite expensive where as the
business end parts seem to be quite cheap.
If these parts were mounted in a homebrew head and low power
settings used on some power supply or other, could such a devive be
used for thin material. When I say shim it could well be thicker
than foil.
Is the cutting voltage of 70-100 actually due to the requiremet of a
decent working distance? Could a short working distance be used
with decreased voltage?
Graham
consumables screwed onto the end. The torches as a whole (with long
cables, hoses, switch etc) seem to quite expensive where as the
business end parts seem to be quite cheap.
If these parts were mounted in a homebrew head and low power
settings used on some power supply or other, could such a devive be
used for thin material. When I say shim it could well be thicker
than foil.
Is the cutting voltage of 70-100 actually due to the requiremet of a
decent working distance? Could a short working distance be used
with decreased voltage?
Graham
> The secret to plasma cutting (and I would like to see a standardIt
> machine that can hold .025 kerf width) is NOT the power supply.
> is just a rather crude constant current source that has a an openarc
> voltage of around 200 Volts and cuts at about 70 to 100 VDC.all
>
> The challenge is to first ionize and "ignite" the air to make the
> 30,000 deg plasma flame and then *control* it so it doesn't cook
> of the surrounding components. Most torchs have specially designedhandle
> swirl chambers to spin the air as it exits the tip. The torch
> and it's design are what largely controls the quality of the cut.their
>
> Hypertherm makes a "Fine cut" series of consumables for some of
> torch models that will hold .025 under perfect conditions,but .010
> is doubtful.the
>
> Precision plasma (different technology and $$$$$) uses shielding
> gases other than shop air and uses oxygen (I think) for the plasma
> and will do some fine cutting.
>
> Using a standard plasma to cut foil is like driving a tack with a
> sledge hammer.
>
> I'm real happy when my torch holds a .062 kerf and depending on
> wear on the consumables it can climb to .080 or higher. Piercepoints
> can be double the cut kerf in diameter. I try to plan my cuts so
> things that need detail are cut first on a new set of consumables.
Discussion Thread
sargossa_99
2004-12-17 06:58:00 UTC
plasma accuracy
turbulatordude
2004-12-17 11:19:50 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
Graham Stabler
2004-12-17 13:35:47 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
V FONG
2004-12-17 14:33:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
turbulatordude
2004-12-17 15:22:18 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
Graham Stabler
2004-12-17 15:50:52 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
John Heritage
2004-12-18 07:30:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
Graham Stabler
2004-12-18 08:35:04 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
caudlet
2004-12-18 08:35:55 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
Graham Stabler
2004-12-18 09:12:58 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
R Rogers
2004-12-18 09:38:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
turbulatordude
2004-12-18 10:46:15 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
caudlet
2004-12-18 13:55:31 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
metlmunchr
2004-12-18 15:14:59 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
Hal Eckhart
2004-12-18 15:42:28 UTC
gecko 201/210 opinions
Raymond Heckert
2004-12-18 17:24:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] plasma accuracy
Raymond Heckert
2004-12-18 17:24:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
caudlet
2004-12-18 17:39:34 UTC
Re: gecko 201/210 opinions
Hal Eckhart
2004-12-18 18:31:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: gecko 201/210 opinions
Hal Eckhart
2004-12-18 18:53:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] plasma accuracy
Jon Elson
2004-12-18 20:40:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] gecko 201/210 opinions
turbulatordude
2004-12-18 21:40:12 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
Randy Brown
2004-12-19 08:03:26 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
caudlet
2004-12-19 13:12:59 UTC
Re: gecko 201/210 opinions
m0nkey0ne
2004-12-20 16:22:25 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
R Rogers
2004-12-20 17:40:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
turbulatordude
2004-12-20 23:26:48 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
Randy Wilson
2004-12-21 05:42:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
Bruce Pigeon
2004-12-21 09:40:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
turbulatordude
2004-12-21 09:46:24 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy