Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] plasma accuracy
Posted by
Hal Eckhart
on 2004-12-18 18:53:42 UTC
On 12/17/04 8:51 PM, Raymond Heckert wrote:
Funny you should mention the 875. That's what I've been using for about 5 years
with my mostly homebrew setup.
Yes, a CNC solution will give you a lot better edge than handheld. But it's not
going to be anywhere near as accurate as you suggest. I typically cut a kerf
around .060" with an .030" nozzle. And even more for anything over about 11
gauge. The kerf is always conical; bigger at the top than the bottom. And if the
nozzle gets dirty or the torch gets bumped, it's not uncommon to see an edge
that's angled at maybe 20 degrees. One little bit of blowback can change the
direction of the arc, which will throw everything out of whack.
It's certainly plently good enough for my uses, but you might be disappointed if
you plan on machine shop accuracy.
Hal Eckhart - Casa Forge - Minneapolis MN - <http://www.casaforge.com>
>I have an ESAB PCM-875 hand-held that's accurate to aboutHi Raymond,
>..005. (I can pull it against a straightedge, and the only
>irregulaarities I can see is where my hand faltered).
Funny you should mention the 875. That's what I've been using for about 5 years
with my mostly homebrew setup.
Yes, a CNC solution will give you a lot better edge than handheld. But it's not
going to be anywhere near as accurate as you suggest. I typically cut a kerf
around .060" with an .030" nozzle. And even more for anything over about 11
gauge. The kerf is always conical; bigger at the top than the bottom. And if the
nozzle gets dirty or the torch gets bumped, it's not uncommon to see an edge
that's angled at maybe 20 degrees. One little bit of blowback can change the
direction of the arc, which will throw everything out of whack.
It's certainly plently good enough for my uses, but you might be disappointed if
you plan on machine shop accuracy.
Hal Eckhart - Casa Forge - Minneapolis MN - <http://www.casaforge.com>
Discussion Thread
sargossa_99
2004-12-17 06:58:00 UTC
plasma accuracy
turbulatordude
2004-12-17 11:19:50 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
Graham Stabler
2004-12-17 13:35:47 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
V FONG
2004-12-17 14:33:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
turbulatordude
2004-12-17 15:22:18 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
Graham Stabler
2004-12-17 15:50:52 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
John Heritage
2004-12-18 07:30:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
Graham Stabler
2004-12-18 08:35:04 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
caudlet
2004-12-18 08:35:55 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
Graham Stabler
2004-12-18 09:12:58 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
R Rogers
2004-12-18 09:38:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
turbulatordude
2004-12-18 10:46:15 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
caudlet
2004-12-18 13:55:31 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
metlmunchr
2004-12-18 15:14:59 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
Hal Eckhart
2004-12-18 15:42:28 UTC
gecko 201/210 opinions
Raymond Heckert
2004-12-18 17:24:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] plasma accuracy
Raymond Heckert
2004-12-18 17:24:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
caudlet
2004-12-18 17:39:34 UTC
Re: gecko 201/210 opinions
Hal Eckhart
2004-12-18 18:31:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: gecko 201/210 opinions
Hal Eckhart
2004-12-18 18:53:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] plasma accuracy
Jon Elson
2004-12-18 20:40:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] gecko 201/210 opinions
turbulatordude
2004-12-18 21:40:12 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
Randy Brown
2004-12-19 08:03:26 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
caudlet
2004-12-19 13:12:59 UTC
Re: gecko 201/210 opinions
m0nkey0ne
2004-12-20 16:22:25 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
R Rogers
2004-12-20 17:40:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
turbulatordude
2004-12-20 23:26:48 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy
Randy Wilson
2004-12-21 05:42:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
Bruce Pigeon
2004-12-21 09:40:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: plasma accuracy
turbulatordude
2004-12-21 09:46:24 UTC
Re: plasma accuracy