Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Minimum reasonable computer speed?
Posted by
JanRwl@A...
on 2005-01-27 23:01:36 UTC
In a message dated 1/27/2005 5:28:52 P.M. Central Standard Time,
codesuidae@... writes:
I've got an old 486 (about 33mhz), which I think should be sufficent, but I
just want to double check.<<
My first home-brew CNC stuff ran off a '286 PC with only 7 mHz. clock. I
use a nice old '386 in my lab, and it's clock is around 20 mHz. The 33 mHz
'486 is MORE than sufficient! You only have to change the "delay loop numbers"
in your software to maintain the desired OUTPUT-rate.
I now have a Pentium3 Compaq which came with Win.95 running my home-brew
lathe, but that '95 got corrupted, and updating to '98 would have cost as much
as a new computer, so I just FORMATTED it and loaded ONLY MSDOS and GWBASIC,
and it works fine, so long as I put in HUGE delay-loop constants in the
step-subroutines.
I can see NO reason to have speed faster than a couple megahurts clock for
CNC purposes, so long as you know how to jiggle the output-rate by changing
constants in your op.sys.
Jan Rowland
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
codesuidae@... writes:
I've got an old 486 (about 33mhz), which I think should be sufficent, but I
just want to double check.<<
My first home-brew CNC stuff ran off a '286 PC with only 7 mHz. clock. I
use a nice old '386 in my lab, and it's clock is around 20 mHz. The 33 mHz
'486 is MORE than sufficient! You only have to change the "delay loop numbers"
in your software to maintain the desired OUTPUT-rate.
I now have a Pentium3 Compaq which came with Win.95 running my home-brew
lathe, but that '95 got corrupted, and updating to '98 would have cost as much
as a new computer, so I just FORMATTED it and loaded ONLY MSDOS and GWBASIC,
and it works fine, so long as I put in HUGE delay-loop constants in the
step-subroutines.
I can see NO reason to have speed faster than a couple megahurts clock for
CNC purposes, so long as you know how to jiggle the output-rate by changing
constants in your op.sys.
Jan Rowland
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
Codesuidae
2005-01-27 15:25:12 UTC
Minimum reasonable computer speed?
Robert Campbell
2005-01-27 15:48:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Minimum reasonable computer speed?
R Rogers
2005-01-27 15:53:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Minimum reasonable computer speed?
Roy J. Tellason
2005-01-27 16:47:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Minimum reasonable computer speed?
Stephen Wille Padnos
2005-01-27 16:51:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Minimum reasonable computer speed?
R Rogers
2005-01-27 17:46:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Minimum reasonable computer speed?
Robert Campbell
2005-01-27 18:14:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Minimum reasonable computer speed?
Scott L Golden
2005-01-27 18:37:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Minimum reasonable computer speed?
turbulatordude
2005-01-27 18:40:23 UTC
Re: Minimum reasonable computer speed?
codeSuidae
2005-01-27 21:52:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Minimum reasonable computer speed?
JanRwl@A...
2005-01-27 23:01:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Minimum reasonable computer speed?
Torsten
2005-01-27 23:50:22 UTC
Re: Minimum reasonable computer speed?
Ron Ginger
2005-01-28 06:20:17 UTC
Re: Minimum reasonable computer speed?
Richard Garnish
2005-01-28 06:30:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Minimum reasonable computer speed?
cnc_4_me
2005-01-28 06:59:15 UTC
Re: Minimum reasonable computer speed?
R Rogers
2005-01-28 07:11:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Minimum reasonable computer speed?
turbulatordude
2005-01-28 07:24:04 UTC
Re: Minimum reasonable computer speed?
Fred Smith
2005-01-28 10:13:37 UTC
Re: Minimum reasonable computer speed?
Alan Marconett
2005-01-28 11:00:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Minimum reasonable computer speed?
JanRwl@A...
2005-01-28 22:25:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Minimum reasonable computer speed?
David A. Frantz
2005-01-29 08:18:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Minimum reasonable computer speed?