CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LPT1

Posted by Jon Elson
on 2005-08-08 19:13:25 UTC
Mike Delany wrote:

>I have been looking into the same thing. It looks like doing anything CNC
>over USB is pretty iffy. USB uses a packet based transport mechanism that
>can interfere with signal timing. There are supposed to be some
>workarounds, but according to Greg Kroah-Hartman (the guy who wrote the
>linux usb patch), they are not real pretty or efficient. I have thought
>about a PCMCIA to serial or parallel adapter, but I have not looked into
>how timing works on it. I think that you might be better off using a PC
>with a true parallel or serial port.
>
>
PCMCIA (later renamed PC-Card) is basically just a CPU bus interface, so as
long as the register bit and address offset assignment is the same as a
standard
parallel port, and the program can accomodate parallel ports at arbitrary
addresses, it should work. (Note that some DOS and other old programs
may restrict the address to between 100 - 3FF, and the PC-Card parallel
adaptor will often use a much higer I/O address.) I have used a PC-Card
parallel adaptor with other DOS software that used no OS driver, and it
worked just fine, once you figured out the address the PC-Card was mapped
to.

Jon

Discussion Thread

stcnc2000 2005-08-07 11:30:01 UTC LPT1 Robert Campbell 2005-08-07 11:42:26 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] LPT1 stcnc2000 2005-08-07 12:05:53 UTC Re: LPT1 Steve Stallings 2005-08-07 12:38:04 UTC Re: LPT1 Robert Campbell 2005-08-07 12:50:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LPT1 thinkcnc@w... 2005-08-07 13:01:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LPT1 caudlet 2005-08-07 15:02:42 UTC Re: LPT1 thinkcnc@w... 2005-08-07 15:10:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LPT1 turbulatordude 2005-08-07 15:19:12 UTC Re: LPT1 thinkcnc@w... 2005-08-07 15:30:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LPT1 JanRwl@A... 2005-08-07 15:38:24 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] LPT1 turbulatordude 2005-08-07 17:30:46 UTC Re: LPT1 JanRwl@A... 2005-08-07 21:24:49 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LPT1 Keith Bucklitch 2005-08-08 14:01:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LPT1 c_holm10017 2005-08-08 14:11:59 UTC Re: LPT1 Andy Wander 2005-08-08 14:19:46 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LPT1 turbulatordude 2005-08-08 14:27:36 UTC Re: LPT1 JCullins 2005-08-08 14:45:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LPT1 Mike Delany 2005-08-08 15:09:04 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LPT1 JanRwl@A... 2005-08-08 17:47:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LPT1 Jon Elson 2005-08-08 19:13:25 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LPT1 Keith Bucklitch 2005-08-09 09:26:26 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LPT1 Keith Bucklitch 2005-08-09 09:26:26 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LPT1 Keith Bucklitch 2005-08-09 09:26:26 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LPT1 George Taylor, IV 2005-08-09 13:15:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LPT1 Keith Bucklitch 2005-08-09 14:41:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LPT1 Andy Wander 2005-08-09 18:09:48 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LPT1 Aahz. 2005-08-09 18:58:16 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LPT1 JanRwl@A... 2005-08-09 22:12:17 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LPT1 George Taylor, IV 2005-08-09 22:24:01 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LPT1 Keith Bucklitch 2005-08-10 01:40:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LPT1 Marv Frankel 2005-08-10 03:12:13 UTC Re: LPT1 Keith Bucklitch 2005-08-10 09:57:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LPT1