Re: Parallel Port Interface cards
Posted by
Chris Johnston
on 2007-01-11 07:40:43 UTC
There is a principle that people used to follow that signal cables
have male connectors and equipment has female connectors. That makes
all of your cables male to male. The theory behind that was that male
connectors are more susceptable to damage - you can knock them
together with something solid and the shell deforms or worse a bunch
of pins fold over. If that happens to a cable you just replace it but
if it happens to a male connector on a piece of equipment it is
usually more expensive to repair and has the potential to damage the
internal circuitry. Of course the IBM PC blew that up when they put
male connectors on the serial ports.
Things like parallel port dongles can't follow this convention, of
course, although I've seen them mounted inside the computer case with
the female connector in the place where the parallel port connector
usually is, but that was done for security.
Chris
have male connectors and equipment has female connectors. That makes
all of your cables male to male. The theory behind that was that male
connectors are more susceptable to damage - you can knock them
together with something solid and the shell deforms or worse a bunch
of pins fold over. If that happens to a cable you just replace it but
if it happens to a male connector on a piece of equipment it is
usually more expensive to repair and has the potential to damage the
internal circuitry. Of course the IBM PC blew that up when they put
male connectors on the serial ports.
Things like parallel port dongles can't follow this convention, of
course, although I've seen them mounted inside the computer case with
the female connector in the place where the parallel port connector
usually is, but that was done for security.
Chris
Discussion Thread
Johan Van Wyk
2007-01-04 06:13:14 UTC
Very Confused!! Need help.
Mike
2007-01-04 07:00:25 UTC
Re: Very Confused!! Need help.
Dale Beckel
2007-01-04 07:58:16 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Very Confused!! Need help.
lcdpublishing
2007-01-04 10:08:54 UTC
Re: Very Confused!! Need help.
Johan Van Wyk
2007-01-04 22:44:45 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Very Confused!! Need help.
Graham Stabler
2007-01-05 02:58:51 UTC
Re: Very Confused!! Need help.
Dale Beckel
2007-01-05 04:55:32 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Very Confused!! Need help.
Pete Brown (YahooGroups)
2007-01-05 05:45:41 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Very Confused!! Need help.
Mark Vaughan
2007-01-05 06:28:57 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Very Confused!! Need help.
Ron Ginger
2007-01-05 06:54:05 UTC
Re:Very Confused!! Need help.
Mike
2007-01-05 07:02:13 UTC
Re: Very Confused!! Need help.
lcdpublishing
2007-01-05 07:40:02 UTC
Re: Very Confused!! Need help.
gary
2007-01-05 08:21:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Very Confused!! Need help.
John Dammeyer
2007-01-05 09:43:04 UTC
CNC motors on a South Bend
Jon Elson
2007-01-05 10:25:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Very Confused!! Need help.
Jon Elson
2007-01-05 10:28:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNC motors on a South Bend
Vince Endter
2007-01-05 10:40:06 UTC
Re: CNC motors on a South Bend
Ken Campbell
2007-01-05 10:50:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Very Confused!! Need help.
Sebastien Bailard
2007-01-05 22:59:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Very Confused!! Need help.
Johan Van Wyk
2007-01-07 23:08:53 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Very Confused!! Need help.
Graham Stabler
2007-01-08 06:28:08 UTC
Re: Very Confused!! Need help.
John Dammeyer
2007-01-09 21:23:06 UTC
Parallel Port Interface cards
Phil Mattison
2007-01-10 08:15:22 UTC
Re: Parallel Port Interface cards
Jon Elson
2007-01-10 09:44:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Parallel Port Interface cards
John Dammeyer
2007-01-10 09:59:37 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Parallel Port Interface cards
Dan Mauch
2007-01-10 10:53:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Parallel Port Interface cards
Chris Johnston
2007-01-11 07:40:43 UTC
Re: Parallel Port Interface cards