Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Smart/Dumb box again...
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2001-02-27 12:06:54 UTC
Brian Walsh wrote:
programmed with logic I designed. It has an interface to accept IEEE-1284
parallel printer handshaking, and 2 axes of 24-bit counters that produce step
pulses with a granularity of 100 nS, which is more than almost anyone would need.
Only 2 axes of the rate generator circuit will fit in the XCS10 size chip, so I'm
rethinking whether to reduce the time resolution or go to a bigger chip, like the
XCS30 or thereabouts. This also needs a counter to keep track of position
either directly counting step pulses or by connecting an encoder to the stepper.
This is somewhat a conceptual thing right now, anyway. I intend to make something
available for this in a while. One option is to put the counter and the rate
generator plus some digital I/O logic all in one big FPGA chip, and put it
all on one big board. This would hopefully accomodate 4 axes of both the
rate generator and the counter. I'm hoping this could be made as a product
for somewhere in the neighborhood of $200, but it seems that once you get
into one of these things, the price always goes up. All those small components
just keep adding up!
Jon
> Do you have a spec of what the chip does and how to apply it? Is the itemIt is not a standard part just for this purpose. It is an FPGA (Xilinx XCS10 series)
> available to purchase?
programmed with logic I designed. It has an interface to accept IEEE-1284
parallel printer handshaking, and 2 axes of 24-bit counters that produce step
pulses with a granularity of 100 nS, which is more than almost anyone would need.
Only 2 axes of the rate generator circuit will fit in the XCS10 size chip, so I'm
rethinking whether to reduce the time resolution or go to a bigger chip, like the
XCS30 or thereabouts. This also needs a counter to keep track of position
either directly counting step pulses or by connecting an encoder to the stepper.
This is somewhat a conceptual thing right now, anyway. I intend to make something
available for this in a while. One option is to put the counter and the rate
generator plus some digital I/O logic all in one big FPGA chip, and put it
all on one big board. This would hopefully accomodate 4 axes of both the
rate generator and the counter. I'm hoping this could be made as a product
for somewhere in the neighborhood of $200, but it seems that once you get
into one of these things, the price always goes up. All those small components
just keep adding up!
Jon
Discussion Thread
dkowalcz@i...
2001-02-26 16:15:10 UTC
Smart/Dumb box again...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-26 17:07:50 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Carlos Guillermo
2001-02-26 17:52:42 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Smart/Dumb box again...
Doug Harrison
2001-02-26 17:56:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Smart/Dumb box again...
ballendo@y...
2001-02-26 18:11:06 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
ballendo@y...
2001-02-26 18:15:38 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
ballendo@y...
2001-02-26 18:22:16 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-26 18:51:30 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Jon Elson
2001-02-26 22:36:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Smart/Dumb box again...
Brian Walsh
2001-02-27 01:49:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Smart/Dumb box again...
Ray
2001-02-27 06:56:01 UTC
Re: Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Ray
2001-02-27 07:02:58 UTC
Re: Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Jon Elson
2001-02-27 12:06:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Smart/Dumb box again...
Paul
2001-02-27 12:48:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-27 14:56:27 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
wanliker@a...
2001-02-27 16:52:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Brian Pitt
2001-02-27 23:05:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Tony Jeffree
2001-02-27 23:34:32 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-28 00:01:08 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-28 00:03:11 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Brian Pitt
2001-02-28 01:31:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Ian Wright
2001-02-28 01:53:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Jon Elson
2001-02-28 11:30:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
dkowalcz@i...
2001-02-28 12:27:25 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again... (CPU timing)
Paul
2001-02-28 12:34:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-28 13:19:24 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-28 14:01:49 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-28 14:22:17 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again... (CPU timing)
Jon Elson
2001-02-28 16:09:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-28 17:01:00 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
wanliker@a...
2001-02-28 17:36:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Henry H. Armstrong
2001-02-28 19:16:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Jon Elson
2001-02-28 23:26:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Matt Shaver
2001-02-28 23:42:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Jon Elson
2001-03-01 12:11:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Smart/Dumb box again... (CPU timing)
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-03-01 12:16:26 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
beer@s...
2001-03-02 08:41:47 UTC
Re: Re: Smart/Dumb box again... (CPU timing)