Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2001-02-28 23:26:29 UTC
Alan Marconett KM6VV wrote:
moments, it really has no idea exactly when the step pulses are actually
coming out. So, the only way to know how many steps have really been
issued is to count them. The step rate generator creates both step and
direction signals, as well as quadrature phase signals. these can be counted
by an encoder counter, as well as used to drive phase-input stepper drivers,
like on BOSS Brodgeport machines. I hope to work on this some more,
and see if I can get more channels into a chip by reducing timing resolution
a bit. (100 nS is probably way more than you need, anyway.)
will drastically lower the cost. He, he, then it will have a 160-pin PLCC!
is more expensive than the chip! (I'm hoping the price on these has come
down since I bought them a couple years ago.)
Jon
> Hi Jon,Yes. The computer sets the step rate with precision, but after a few
>
> thanks for the additional info on your boards.
>
> So it will cost about $700 to get 3 or 4 axis support? I like the ECP
> (IEEE-1284) interface! Sounds like great resolution, although if one
> just wants to run "open loop", then is the encoder board still
> necessary?
moments, it really has no idea exactly when the step pulses are actually
coming out. So, the only way to know how many steps have really been
issued is to count them. The step rate generator creates both step and
direction signals, as well as quadrature phase signals. these can be counted
by an encoder counter, as well as used to drive phase-input stepper drivers,
like on BOSS Brodgeport machines. I hope to work on this some more,
and see if I can get more channels into a chip by reducing timing resolution
a bit. (100 nS is probably way more than you need, anyway.)
> Looks more like you're targeting commercial systems, I wasAs I said, I also hope to redo this as a complete package on one board, which
> hoping to get in under $200 ($100?) for a 3 or 4 axis rate generator.
will drastically lower the cost. He, he, then it will have a 160-pin PLCC!
> 84-lead PLCC's are not something I want to solder in, either!Yeah, that's why I'm using the socket! Unfortunately, the 160-pin socket
is more expensive than the chip! (I'm hoping the price on these has come
down since I bought them a couple years ago.)
Jon
Discussion Thread
dkowalcz@i...
2001-02-26 16:15:10 UTC
Smart/Dumb box again...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-26 17:07:50 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Carlos Guillermo
2001-02-26 17:52:42 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Smart/Dumb box again...
Doug Harrison
2001-02-26 17:56:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Smart/Dumb box again...
ballendo@y...
2001-02-26 18:11:06 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
ballendo@y...
2001-02-26 18:15:38 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
ballendo@y...
2001-02-26 18:22:16 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-26 18:51:30 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Jon Elson
2001-02-26 22:36:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Smart/Dumb box again...
Brian Walsh
2001-02-27 01:49:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Smart/Dumb box again...
Ray
2001-02-27 06:56:01 UTC
Re: Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Ray
2001-02-27 07:02:58 UTC
Re: Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Jon Elson
2001-02-27 12:06:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Smart/Dumb box again...
Paul
2001-02-27 12:48:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-27 14:56:27 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
wanliker@a...
2001-02-27 16:52:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Brian Pitt
2001-02-27 23:05:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Tony Jeffree
2001-02-27 23:34:32 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-28 00:01:08 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-28 00:03:11 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Brian Pitt
2001-02-28 01:31:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Ian Wright
2001-02-28 01:53:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Jon Elson
2001-02-28 11:30:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
dkowalcz@i...
2001-02-28 12:27:25 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again... (CPU timing)
Paul
2001-02-28 12:34:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-28 13:19:24 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-28 14:01:49 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-28 14:22:17 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again... (CPU timing)
Jon Elson
2001-02-28 16:09:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-28 17:01:00 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
wanliker@a...
2001-02-28 17:36:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Henry H. Armstrong
2001-02-28 19:16:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Jon Elson
2001-02-28 23:26:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Matt Shaver
2001-02-28 23:42:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Jon Elson
2001-03-01 12:11:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Smart/Dumb box again... (CPU timing)
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-03-01 12:16:26 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
beer@s...
2001-03-02 08:41:47 UTC
Re: Re: Smart/Dumb box again... (CPU timing)