RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Smart/Dumb box again...
Posted by
Carlos Guillermo
on 2001-02-26 17:52:42 UTC
Dave -
Having the "box" be an old PC doesn't matter much to me, except for the
SIZE. It will be enough to have the primary PC and it's monitor next to the
machine, as well as the machine's electrical enclosure. Now add a monstrous
386/486 tower or equiv, plus any peripherals you would need to support it,
and I'll have to expand my shop.
Carlos Guillermo
VERVE Engineering & Design
-----Original Message-----
From: dkowalcz@... [mailto:dkowalcz@...]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 7:15 PM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Smart/Dumb box again...
To all,
Had a thought today (dangerous, I know..!) Back to that black box
we were discussing a month or two ago...
Instead of using special hardware - how about, say, running a tight
assembler program on an old 386 or 486 PC to do two things:
- Read tokenized commands from the COM port
- Control steppers, limit switches on the parallel port
This way, whatever's running the interpreter can just send very
general commands to the "workhorse" computer that takes care of the
rest and handshakes when it's done.
Some back of the envelope figuring tells me that smooth pulses up
to about 500kHz should be pretty easy to achieve, hooking interrupts
and such of course. I was surprised this week to find that my old
VIC-20 driven servo controller ran in about 200 bytes of assembly
language.
Seemed like more at the time, you know? :) Anyway, that set me to
thinking about what could be realizable with the more modern junk and
some sharp programming. Any thoughts?
Dave Kowalczyk
Ames IA
Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the
discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
Addresses:
Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
bill,
List Manager
FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Having the "box" be an old PC doesn't matter much to me, except for the
SIZE. It will be enough to have the primary PC and it's monitor next to the
machine, as well as the machine's electrical enclosure. Now add a monstrous
386/486 tower or equiv, plus any peripherals you would need to support it,
and I'll have to expand my shop.
Carlos Guillermo
VERVE Engineering & Design
-----Original Message-----
From: dkowalcz@... [mailto:dkowalcz@...]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 7:15 PM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Smart/Dumb box again...
To all,
Had a thought today (dangerous, I know..!) Back to that black box
we were discussing a month or two ago...
Instead of using special hardware - how about, say, running a tight
assembler program on an old 386 or 486 PC to do two things:
- Read tokenized commands from the COM port
- Control steppers, limit switches on the parallel port
This way, whatever's running the interpreter can just send very
general commands to the "workhorse" computer that takes care of the
rest and handshakes when it's done.
Some back of the envelope figuring tells me that smooth pulses up
to about 500kHz should be pretty easy to achieve, hooking interrupts
and such of course. I was surprised this week to find that my old
VIC-20 driven servo controller ran in about 200 bytes of assembly
language.
Seemed like more at the time, you know? :) Anyway, that set me to
thinking about what could be realizable with the more modern junk and
some sharp programming. Any thoughts?
Dave Kowalczyk
Ames IA
Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the
discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
Addresses:
Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
bill,
List Manager
FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Discussion Thread
dkowalcz@i...
2001-02-26 16:15:10 UTC
Smart/Dumb box again...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-26 17:07:50 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Carlos Guillermo
2001-02-26 17:52:42 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Smart/Dumb box again...
Doug Harrison
2001-02-26 17:56:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Smart/Dumb box again...
ballendo@y...
2001-02-26 18:11:06 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
ballendo@y...
2001-02-26 18:15:38 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
ballendo@y...
2001-02-26 18:22:16 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-26 18:51:30 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Jon Elson
2001-02-26 22:36:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Smart/Dumb box again...
Brian Walsh
2001-02-27 01:49:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Smart/Dumb box again...
Ray
2001-02-27 06:56:01 UTC
Re: Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Ray
2001-02-27 07:02:58 UTC
Re: Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Jon Elson
2001-02-27 12:06:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Smart/Dumb box again...
Paul
2001-02-27 12:48:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-27 14:56:27 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
wanliker@a...
2001-02-27 16:52:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Brian Pitt
2001-02-27 23:05:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Tony Jeffree
2001-02-27 23:34:32 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-28 00:01:08 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-28 00:03:11 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Brian Pitt
2001-02-28 01:31:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Ian Wright
2001-02-28 01:53:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Jon Elson
2001-02-28 11:30:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
dkowalcz@i...
2001-02-28 12:27:25 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again... (CPU timing)
Paul
2001-02-28 12:34:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-28 13:19:24 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-28 14:01:49 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-28 14:22:17 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again... (CPU timing)
Jon Elson
2001-02-28 16:09:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-02-28 17:01:00 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
wanliker@a...
2001-02-28 17:36:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Henry H. Armstrong
2001-02-28 19:16:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Jon Elson
2001-02-28 23:26:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Matt Shaver
2001-02-28 23:42:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
Jon Elson
2001-03-01 12:11:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Smart/Dumb box again... (CPU timing)
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-03-01 12:16:26 UTC
Re: Smart/Dumb box again...
beer@s...
2001-03-02 08:41:47 UTC
Re: Re: Smart/Dumb box again... (CPU timing)